Skip to content

Comparative Study of 3 Portable Oxygen Concentrators During a 6-minute Walk Test in Patients With Chronic Lung Disease

A Comparative Pilot Study of the Efficacy of Three Portable Oxygen Concentrators During a 6-Minute Walk Test in Patients With Chronic Lung Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01653730
Enrollment
24
Registered
2012-07-31
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2012-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, Pulmonary Fibrosis

Keywords

portable oxygen concentrator, 6-minute walk test, chronic obstructive lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis, long term oxygen therapy

Brief summary

Background: Portable oxygen concentrators (POCs) featuring the latest integrated oxygen conserving devices (OCDs) provide greater patient accessibility and mobility during ambulation and travel. Recent POCs are compact, lightweight, battery-operated, and require no refill-time, thus meeting patients' clinical and lifestyle needs. There is, however, a lack of research on the clinical performance of the latest POCs that could help to determine their ability to maintain patients' oxygen saturations ≥ 90 % during exercise. Aim: The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of three POCs, with maximum oxygen production capabilities of 950 to 3000 ml per minute, to maintain oxygen saturations ≥ 90 % in patients with chronic lung disease during exercise. Method: Six minute walk tests (6-MWTs) will be administered in order to measure oxygen saturations by pulse oximetry (SpO2) in up to 20 patients with a diagnosis of either Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), or Pulmonary Fibrosis (PF) with documented exertional oxygen desaturations of ≤ 85% on room air. All participants will participate in 4 different 6-minute walk tests: the first will be a control walk performed with the participants' current oxygen system set at their prescribed exertional flow rate. Then, the participants will perform a walk test with each of the three POCs set at the units' maximum pulse dose setting. The order in which the participants use the POCs will be randomly assigned using a sequence generator. Hypothesis: It is hypothesized that all three POCs will provide oxygen saturations ≥ 90 % during exercise in patients with chronic lung disease with moderate to severe exertional oxygen desaturation.

Detailed description

Participants will attend two study sessions. During the session 1 participants will perform a 6-minute walk test on room air oxygen to assess their suitability for the study. Only those participants with documented exertional oxygen desaturations of ≤ 85% as measured by pulse oximetry during this walk will be asked to return for the second session. During session 2 participants will perform a further four 6-minute walk tests spread over a morning and afternoon testing session. All all data for primary and secondary outcomes will be measured at session 2.

Interventions

DEVICEEclipse 3 portable oxygen concentrator
DEVICEEverGo portable oxygen concentrator
DEVICEiGo portable oxygen concentrator

Sponsors

Institute for Rehabilitation Research and Development, The Ottawa Hospital Rehabilitation Centre
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Existing diagnosis of chronic obstructive lung disease or pulmonary fibrosis * completed the pulmonary rehabilitation program at The Ottawa Hospital Rehabilitation Centre between January 30th 2008 and March 31st 2011 * medically stable * medical prescription for long term oxygen therapy * 18 years or older

Exclusion criteria

* non-ambulatory * not independent for activities of daily living * not active in the community * show limited improvement with any level of continuous oxygen flow rate * require more than 6 litres per minute of oxygen on continuous flow during exertion * experienced an exacerbation of their respiratory medical condition over the last 6 weeks, or have not fully recovered from a recent exacerbation * have moderate to severe orthopaedic or neurological conditions limiting their ability to walk * have any other impairments that could affect the consistency of the 6-minute walk test * have severe co-morbid conditions * are limited by their cardiac condition or have been diagnosed with a cardiac condition since completion of their pulmonary rehabilitation * severe cognitive or memory deficit * speak neither French nor English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in saturation of oxygen in the blood after a 6-minute walk testDuring study session 2: immediately before beginning (pre-) and immediately after finishing (post-) each of four 6-minute walk testsFor patient safety oxygen saturation was monitored throughout each 6-minute walk test using pulse oximetry. Pre- and post-walk values were captured as the primary outcome measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total distance walkedDuring study session 2: immediately after finishing (post-) each of four 6-minute walk tests
Change in Dyspnea ratings after a 6-minute walk testDuring study session 2: immediately before beginning (pre-) and immediately after finishing (post-) each of four 6-minute walk testsMeasured with the modified 10-point Borg scale
Patient preference ratingsDuring study session 2: immediately after finishing (post-) each of four 6-minute walk testsMeasured using a self-report questionnaire where patients were asked to indicate how much they agreed with statements about the device they had just used.
Walk time spent with oxygen saturation greater than or equal to 90%During study session 2: immediately after finishing (post-) each of four 6-minute walk tests

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026