Skip to content

Phase II Study of 5-FU, Oxaliplatin Plus Dasatinib in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Phase II Study of 5-Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin Plus Dasatinib (FOLFOX-D) in First-line Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01652976
Acronym
FOLFOX-D
Enrollment
44
Registered
2012-07-30
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2020-07-31
Last updated
2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic

Keywords

Metastatic, Pancreatic Cancer, Adenocarcinoma

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to determine if the study drug, dasatinib, given in combination with 5-Fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) will work against metastatic pancreatic cancer. Dasatinib is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug for treating chronic myelogenous leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia, however it is not currently approved for use in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Detailed description

Systemic control of pancreatic cancer remains a clinical unmet need. The recent superiority of 5-FU based combination therapies over the historical standard gemcitabine represents an opportunity to develop novel combinations of synergistic and effective cytotoxic and biologic targeted therapies. Src excess activity has been demonstrated in pancreatic cancer and is implicated in the invasive and metastatic phenotype clearly represented by this disease. Inhibition of Src activity is associated with numerous biologic modifications capable of positively modifying this phenotype and appears to have synergy with restoring inherent chemosensitivity. The addition of dasatinib to FOLFOX (FOLFOX-D) represents a novel therapeutic regimen in pancreatic cancer with safety and pharmacokinetic data already having been established in colorectal cancer. This protocol will test the safety and activity of this combination in pancreatic cancer where current clinical outcomes remain far from optimal.

Interventions

DRUGDasatinib

Dasatinib 150mg PO daily on days 1-14 of each 14 day cycle

DRUGmFOLFOX6

mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 IV, leucovorin 400mg/m2 IV, 5-Fluorouracil bolus 400mg/m2 IV, and 5-Fluorouracil 2400mg/m2 IV) on day 1 of each 14 day cycle

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pancreatic adenocarcinoma with evidence of metastatic disease on imaging * Measurable disease (per RECIST 1.1) * ECOG Performance Status 0-2 * No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients may have received prior treatment for non-metastatic disease; however the diagnosis of metastatic disease must have been made more than 6 months after completion of treatment. * Patients may have a history of other malignancies if there is no current evidence of persistent or recurrent disease and they are not undergoing any active therapy (including hormonal) * Patent biliary system * Patients receiving anti-coagulation treatment with an agent such as Coumadin or heparin may be allowed to participate, provided they are on stable anti-coagulation therapy with no active bleeding and have no condition that carries a high risk of bleeding * Adequate organ and marrow function * Ability to take oral medication (dasatinib must be swallowed whole) * Patient agrees to discontinue prohibited concomitant medications * Age \> 18 years * Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be using an adequate method of contraception throughout the study and for at least 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug. * A male subject of fathering potential must use an adequate method of contraception throughout the study and for at least 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug.

Exclusion criteria

* WOCBP who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy for the entire study period and for at least 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding and sexually active fertile men not using effective birth control if their partners are WOCBP are also excluded. * History of known brain metastases or carcinomatous meningitis * Recent major surgery (within 4 weeks) or minor surgery (within 2 weeks), excluding placement of a vascular access device or biliary stent * Uncontrolled diabetes * Any sensory neuropathy \> grade 1 at baseline * Serious active or uncontrolled infection * Concurrent medical condition which may increase the risk of toxicity including clinically significant pleural or pericardial effusion, patients with known DPD deficiency or patients with a history of allergic reactions attributed to oxaliplatin, 5-FU or leucovorin. * Cardiac Symptoms including unstable angina or stable angina markedly limiting ordinary physical activity, NYHA class III or IV congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction or stroke within 6 months of study enrollment, diagnosed congenital long QT syndrome, any history of clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias, prolonged QTc interval on pre-entry ECG or clinically significant peripheral vascular disease. * Subjects with hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia if it cannot be corrected prior to dasatinib administration * History of significant bleeding disorder unrelated to cancer, including diagnosed congenital bleeding disorders, diagnosed acquired bleeding disorder within one year or ongoing or recent (≤ 3 months) significant gastrointestinal bleeding. * History of any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of protocol therapy, might affect the interpretation of the results of the study, or that puts the subject at high risk for treatment complications. * Use of category I drugs that are generally accepted to have a risk of causing Torsades de Pointes * Use of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors that significantly increase dasatinib exposure * Prisoners or subjects who are involuntarily incarcerated * Subjects who are compulsorily detained for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical (eg, infectious disease) illness * Inability to comply with study and/or follow-up procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS)3 yearsDetermine activity of 5-Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) plus dasatinib on progression free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Freedom From Metastasis3 yearsTo determine the rate of freedom from metastasis (FFM), which is defined as the percentage of subjects with documented progressive disease (by RECIST 1.1 criteria) who had no new lesions. RECIST 1.1 criteria defines progressive disease as the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the increase of the sum of the largest diameter of the target lesions by at least 20% from the smallest sum collected (the sum must also have increased by at least 5 mm).
Median Time To Progression3 yearsTo determine the median time to progression (TTP). TTP is defined as the time (in months) from when a subject achieves either a complete or partial response by RECIST 1.1 criteria until progressive disease (by RECIST 1.1 criteria) or death occurs.
Median Overall Survival4 yearsTo determine median overall survival (OS) in months
Clinical Benefit Rate3 yearsTo determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR). The CBR is defined as the percentage of subjects who achieved either a complete or partial response or stable disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria. RECIST 1.1 criteria defines a partial response as a decrease of the sum of the largest diameter each target lesion by at least 30%. A complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (except lymph nodes, whose short axis must measure 10 mm or less). By RECIST 1.1 criteria, a subject is considered to have stable disease when the sum of the largest diameter of the target lesions has neither decreased enough to qualify as a partial response not increased enough to qualify as progressive disease.
Response Rate3 yearsTo determine the response rate (RR) by RECIST 1.1 criteria. The response rate is the number of subjects who had either a complete or partial response by RECIST 1.1 criteria. RECIST 1.1 criteria defines a partial response as a decrease of the sum of the largest diameter each target lesion by at least 30%. A complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (except lymph nodes, whose short axis must measure 10 mm or less). The imaging modality used for all RECIST assessments in this study was CT.
Safety and Tolerability3 yearsTo determine the safety profile and tolerability of this regimen in this population by evaluating acute treatment related toxicities using CTCAE v4.0 criteria. Using the CTCAE v4.0, the severity of each adverse event reported was graded on a scale of 1 (mild severity) to 5 (fatal). For this outcome measure the percentage of subjects experiencing any adverse event of each CTCAE grade was tabulated.
Drug Compliance3 yearsTo determine patient compliance with oral therapy. For this outcome measure, compliance with oral therapy is defined as the percentage of subjects that took dasatinib for at least one cycle. Compliance with oral therapy was documented with a medication diary that subjects were asked to complete to document whether each dose of dasatinib was taken.
Quality of Life, as Measured by the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), 20073 yearsTo determine the quality of life (QOL) of patients receiving this therapy using the CTSQ questionnaire. The CTSQ consists of 16 questions where subjects respond with a score on a scale of 0 (worst)-4 (best). The responses to the questions are used to calculate 3 subscores: Expectations of Therapy (ET), Feelings about Side Effects (FSE), and Satisfaction with Therapy (SWT). Each subscore is calculated by multiplying the mean response value for the questions used to calculate that subscore by 25. The maximum value is 100 and the minimum value is 0 for all 3 subscores. A higher subscore indicates better QOL in that area. The mean difference in each of the 3 subscores from baseline and 95% confidence interval for the entire study population is reported here. A negative mean difference indicates a decrease from baseline in QOL for that area.
Quality of Life, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; Hepatobiliary Cancer (FACT-Hep) Questionnaire (Version 4.0)3 yearsThe FACT-Hep consists of 45 questions where subjects respond with a score on a scale of 0 (worst)-4 (best). The responses to the questions are summed to calculate 5 subscores: Physical Well-Being (PWB), Social Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB), Functional Well-Being (FWB), and Hepatobiliary Cancer Subscale (HCS). The mean difference in each of the 5 subscores from baseline, as well as the total score of the 5 subscores (the FACT-Hep Total Score) for the entire study population is reported here. The mean difference in the FACT-G Total Score (calculated by summing the PWB, SWB, EWB, and FWB subscores) is also reported here. A negative mean difference indicates a decrease from baseline in QOL. Score ranges- PWB subscore: 0-28, SWB subscore: 0-28, EWB subscore: 0-24, FWB subscore: 0-28, HCS subscore: 0-72, FACT-G Total Score: 0-108, and FACT-Hep Total Score: 0-180. A higher value for each subscore or total score indicates better QOL.
Site of Failure3 yearsTo determine the site of failure of this regimen in this population. The site of failure is the anatomical site(s) where disease progression by RECIST 1.1 criteria was noted on imaging.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment Arm
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6 Dasatinib: Dasatinib 150mg PO daily on days 1-14 of each 14 day cycle mFOLFOX6: mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 IV, leucovorin 400mg/m2 IV, 5-Fluorouracil bolus 400mg/m2 IV, and 5-Fluorouracil 2400mg/m2 IV) on day 1 of each 14 day cycle
44
Total44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment Arm
Age, Continuous65 years
ECOG Performance status
Performance Status Unknown
1 Participants
ECOG Performance status
Status = 0
22 Participants
ECOG Performance status
Status = 1
19 Participants
ECOG Performance status
Status = 2
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
38 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
42 / 44
other
Total, other adverse events
44 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
24 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Determine activity of 5-Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) plus dasatinib on progression free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Progression Free Survival (PFS)4 months
Secondary

Clinical Benefit Rate

To determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR). The CBR is defined as the percentage of subjects who achieved either a complete or partial response or stable disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria. RECIST 1.1 criteria defines a partial response as a decrease of the sum of the largest diameter each target lesion by at least 30%. A complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (except lymph nodes, whose short axis must measure 10 mm or less). By RECIST 1.1 criteria, a subject is considered to have stable disease when the sum of the largest diameter of the target lesions has neither decreased enough to qualify as a partial response not increased enough to qualify as progressive disease.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Clinical Benefit Rate56.82 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Drug Compliance

To determine patient compliance with oral therapy. For this outcome measure, compliance with oral therapy is defined as the percentage of subjects that took dasatinib for at least one cycle. Compliance with oral therapy was documented with a medication diary that subjects were asked to complete to document whether each dose of dasatinib was taken.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Drug Compliance93.2 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Freedom From Metastasis

To determine the rate of freedom from metastasis (FFM), which is defined as the percentage of subjects with documented progressive disease (by RECIST 1.1 criteria) who had no new lesions. RECIST 1.1 criteria defines progressive disease as the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or the increase of the sum of the largest diameter of the target lesions by at least 20% from the smallest sum collected (the sum must also have increased by at least 5 mm).

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure only includes the 29 participants who had documented disease progression (by RECIST 1.1 criteria) during study participation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Freedom From Metastasis65.5 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Median Overall Survival

To determine median overall survival (OS) in months

Time frame: 4 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Median Overall Survival10.6 months
Secondary

Median Time To Progression

To determine the median time to progression (TTP). TTP is defined as the time (in months) from when a subject achieves either a complete or partial response by RECIST 1.1 criteria until progressive disease (by RECIST 1.1 criteria) or death occurs.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure includes only the 11 participants who achieved either a complete or partial response by RECIST 1.1 criteria during study participation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Median Time To Progression9.8 months
Secondary

Quality of Life, as Measured by the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), 2007

To determine the quality of life (QOL) of patients receiving this therapy using the CTSQ questionnaire. The CTSQ consists of 16 questions where subjects respond with a score on a scale of 0 (worst)-4 (best). The responses to the questions are used to calculate 3 subscores: Expectations of Therapy (ET), Feelings about Side Effects (FSE), and Satisfaction with Therapy (SWT). Each subscore is calculated by multiplying the mean response value for the questions used to calculate that subscore by 25. The maximum value is 100 and the minimum value is 0 for all 3 subscores. A higher subscore indicates better QOL in that area. The mean difference in each of the 3 subscores from baseline and 95% confidence interval for the entire study population is reported here. A negative mean difference indicates a decrease from baseline in QOL for that area.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Quality of Life, as Measured by the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), 2007Subscore difference for ET-8.4 score on a scale
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Quality of Life, as Measured by the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), 2007Subscore difference for FSE2.1 score on a scale
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Quality of Life, as Measured by the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), 2007Subscore difference for SWT-0.5 score on a scale
Secondary

Quality of Life, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; Hepatobiliary Cancer (FACT-Hep) Questionnaire (Version 4.0)

The FACT-Hep consists of 45 questions where subjects respond with a score on a scale of 0 (worst)-4 (best). The responses to the questions are summed to calculate 5 subscores: Physical Well-Being (PWB), Social Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB), Functional Well-Being (FWB), and Hepatobiliary Cancer Subscale (HCS). The mean difference in each of the 5 subscores from baseline, as well as the total score of the 5 subscores (the FACT-Hep Total Score) for the entire study population is reported here. The mean difference in the FACT-G Total Score (calculated by summing the PWB, SWB, EWB, and FWB subscores) is also reported here. A negative mean difference indicates a decrease from baseline in QOL. Score ranges- PWB subscore: 0-28, SWB subscore: 0-28, EWB subscore: 0-24, FWB subscore: 0-28, HCS subscore: 0-72, FACT-G Total Score: 0-108, and FACT-Hep Total Score: 0-180. A higher value for each subscore or total score indicates better QOL.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Quality of Life, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; Hepatobiliary Cancer (FACT-Hep) Questionnaire (Version 4.0)Subscore difference for PWB-4.4 score on a scale
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Quality of Life, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; Hepatobiliary Cancer (FACT-Hep) Questionnaire (Version 4.0)Subscore difference for SWB-0.9 score on a scale
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Quality of Life, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; Hepatobiliary Cancer (FACT-Hep) Questionnaire (Version 4.0)Subscore difference for EWB0.6 score on a scale
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Quality of Life, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; Hepatobiliary Cancer (FACT-Hep) Questionnaire (Version 4.0)Subscore difference for FWB-2.8 score on a scale
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Quality of Life, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; Hepatobiliary Cancer (FACT-Hep) Questionnaire (Version 4.0)Subscore difference for HCS-6.3 score on a scale
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Quality of Life, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; Hepatobiliary Cancer (FACT-Hep) Questionnaire (Version 4.0)Difference in FACT-G Total Score-7.4 score on a scale
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Quality of Life, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; Hepatobiliary Cancer (FACT-Hep) Questionnaire (Version 4.0)Difference in FACT-Hep Total Score-13.7 score on a scale
Secondary

Response Rate

To determine the response rate (RR) by RECIST 1.1 criteria. The response rate is the number of subjects who had either a complete or partial response by RECIST 1.1 criteria. RECIST 1.1 criteria defines a partial response as a decrease of the sum of the largest diameter each target lesion by at least 30%. A complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (except lymph nodes, whose short axis must measure 10 mm or less). The imaging modality used for all RECIST assessments in this study was CT.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Response Rate25 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Safety and Tolerability

To determine the safety profile and tolerability of this regimen in this population by evaluating acute treatment related toxicities using CTCAE v4.0 criteria. Using the CTCAE v4.0, the severity of each adverse event reported was graded on a scale of 1 (mild severity) to 5 (fatal). For this outcome measure the percentage of subjects experiencing any adverse event of each CTCAE grade was tabulated.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Safety and TolerabilityPercent of subjects experiencing a Grade 4 event22.7 percentage of subjects
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Safety and TolerabilityPercent of subjects experiencing a grade 5 event9.1 percentage of subjects
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Safety and TolerabilityPercent of subjects experiencing a Grade 1 event88.6 percentage of subjects
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Safety and TolerabilityPercent of subjects experiencing a grade 2 event90.9 percentage of subjects
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Safety and TolerabilityPercent of subjects experiencing a Grade 3 event86.4 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Site of Failure

To determine the site of failure of this regimen in this population. The site of failure is the anatomical site(s) where disease progression by RECIST 1.1 criteria was noted on imaging.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Site of FailureLeft pleural effusion1 Participants
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Site of FailureLiver12 Participants
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Site of FailureLungs3 Participants
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Site of FailurePancreas/liver4 Participants
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Site of FailurePeritoneal carcinomatosis1 Participants
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Site of Failureperitoneal carcinomatosis/liver1 Participants
Dasatinib and mFOLFOX6Site of FailureSpleen/liver1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026