Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of MK-8457 + Methotrexate (MTX) in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response or intolerance to anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF-α) therapy. The primary hypothesis of this study is that among participants with active RA, MK-8457 100 mg twice daily (BID) + MTX will be superior to placebo + MTX as measured by the change in Disease Activity Score 28 C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) after 12 weeks of treatment.
Detailed description
In the Base Study, participants were to receive blinded MK-8457 100 mg + MTX or matched placebo + MTX for up to 24 weeks. At Week 12 and 18, efficacy evaluation was conducted to assess eligibility for early escape, defined as \<20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts. Participants who completed the Base Study and those eligible for early escape could enroll in the 76-week Safety Extension in which participants were to receive open-label MK-8457 100 mg BID + MTX. All participants must have been treated with MTX for at least 3 months prior to Screening and have been receiving a stable dose of MTX for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening. In addition, each participant must have either failed treatment with 1 or 2 anti-TNF-α therapies or was intolerant to anti-TNF-α therapy prior to Screening. For participants who failed therapy, the treatment with anti-TNF-α therapies must have been for at least 3 months.
Interventions
DRUGMK-8457 100 mg
MK-8457 100 mg dosed orally BID
DRUGMethotrexate
MTX dosed at the stable dose received upon study entry
DRUGDose-match placebo
Dose-matched placebo dosed orally BID
Sponsors
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis for at least 6 months prior to screening * Active rheumatoid arthritis as defined by the presence of \>= 6 swollen joints (of 66 count) and \>= 6 tender joints (of 68 joint count) * C-reactive protein blood level \>0.9 mg/dL or an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) \>28 mm/hr and evidence of synovitis on imaging * American College of Rheumatology Functional Class I, II, or III * Received methotrexate for a minimum of 3 months prior to screening with a regionally appropriate stable weekly dose for at least 4 weeks prior to screening. The dose of methotrexate must remain stable through Week 24 of the study. * Failed treatment with 1 or 2 anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) therapies or was intolerant to anti-TNF-α therapy prior to screening * If using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or other analgesics, participant must be on a stable dose * No history of either untreated latent or active tuberculosis (TB) prior to baseline * Participants of reproductive potential must agree to remain abstinent or use 2 acceptable methods of birth control
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis, including but not limited to psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease * Hospitalization due to an acute cardiovascular event, cardiovascular illness, or cardiovascular surgery within 6 months of screening * Participant has a transplanted organ, excluding corneal transplant, performed \> 3 months prior to the first dose of trial medication * History of, or current ongoing ,chronic or recurrent infectious disease * Positive hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C test result * Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive * User of recreational or illicit drugs or has had a history (within the previous 2 years) of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence * Prior exposure to fostamatinib or other spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors * Prior exposure to 3 or more anti-TNF therapeutic agents * Has been treated for RA with a marketed biologic agent (other than anti-TNF therapeutic agents) and failed the agent due to lack of efficacy * Currently participating in another interventional clinical trial or has participated in an interventional clinical trial within 4 weeks prior to screening * Severe opportunistic infection within the 6 months prior to screening
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) as Measured by C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | The DAS28-CRP is a continuous parameter based upon a statistically-derived index combining tender joints (28 joints; 0=absent, 1=present; TEN28), swollen joints (28 joints; 0=absent, 1=present; SW28), CRP (an inflammatory marker, decrease indicates improvement), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0=doing very well to 100=doing very poor; GH). It is defined as follows: DAS28-CRP = 0.56 × SQRT(TEN28) + 0.28 × SQRT(SW28) + 0.36 × ln (CRP+1) + 0.014 × GH + 0.96. The DAS28-CRP is a scale ranging from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater RA disease activity. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR20 Response at Week 24 | Week 24 | ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response at Week 12 | Week 12 | ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only. |
| Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 24 | Baseline and Week 24 | The DAS28-CRP is a continuous parameter based upon a statistically-derived index combining tender joints (28 joints; 0=absent, 1=present; TEN28), swollen joints (28 joints; 0=absent, 1=present; SW28), CRP (decrease indicates improvement), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0=doing very well to 100=doing very poor; GH, ). It is defined as follows: DAS28-CRP = 0.56 × SQRT(TEN28) + 0.28 × SQRT(SW28) + 0.36 × ln (CRP+1) + 0.014 × GH + 0.96. The DAS28-CRP is a scale ranging from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater RA disease activity. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 12 | Week 12 | ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response at Week 24 | Week 24 | ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0=Absent; 1=Present) and 2) ≥50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, 0=no pain to 100=extreme pain); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (0=doing very well to 100=doing very poor); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (0=doing very well to 100=doing very poor; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from 0=no difficulty to 24=inability to perform tasks; and e) CRP (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only. |
| Change From Baseline in the HAQ Disability Index at Week 24 | Baseline and Week 24 | The functional status of the participant was assessed using the Disability Index of the HAQ on a Likert scale. This 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. The overall score for the Disability Index is the mean of the 8 functional area scores and also ranges from 0 to 3, with a lower score indicating less disability. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only. |
| Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability (HAQ Disability Index) at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | The functional status of the participant was assessed using the Disability Index of the HAQ on a Likert scale. This 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. The overall score for the Disability Index is the mean of the 8 functional area scores and also ranges from 0 to 3, with a lower score indicating less disability. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only. |
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This trial was conducted at 53 clinical centers in the United States, Australia, Columbia, Denmark, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, South Africa, Spain, and in the United Kingdom. A total of 120 participants were screened and 56 were enrolled.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Base Study: MK-8457 MK-8457 100 mg BID + MTX for up to 24 weeks in the Base Study | 30 |
| Base Study: Placebo Placebo BID + MTX for up to 24 weeks in the Base Study | 26 |
| Total | 56 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base Study | Adverse Event | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Base Study | Early Escape | 2 | 8 | 0 |
| Base Study | Study terminated by sponsor | 21 | 16 | 0 |
| Base Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Extension Study | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Extension Study | Study terminated by sponsor | 0 | 0 | 13 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Base Study: MK-8457 | Base Study: Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 57.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 | 59.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 | 58.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 |
| Age, Customized <65 years | 21 Participants | 20 Participants | 41 Participants |
| Age, Customized ≥65 years | 9 Participants | 6 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 22 Participants | 21 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants | 5 Participants | 13 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 10 / 30 | 2 / 26 | 6 / 14 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 30 | 0 / 26 | 2 / 14 |
Outcome results
Primary
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) as Measured by C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12
The DAS28-CRP is a continuous parameter based upon a statistically-derived index combining tender joints (28 joints; 0=absent, 1=present; TEN28), swollen joints (28 joints; 0=absent, 1=present; SW28), CRP (an inflammatory marker, decrease indicates improvement), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0=doing very well to 100=doing very poor; GH). It is defined as follows: DAS28-CRP = 0.56 × SQRT(TEN28) + 0.28 × SQRT(SW28) + 0.36 × ln (CRP+1) + 0.014 × GH + 0.96. The DAS28-CRP is a scale ranging from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater RA disease activity. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Randomized participants in the Base Study who received at least one dose of study drug and had both Baseline and Week 12 DAS28-CRP measurements
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Base Study: MK-8457 | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) as Measured by C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 | -1.83 Units on a scale |
| Base Study: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) as Measured by C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 | -1.31 Units on a scale |
p-value: 0.30895% CI: [-1.54, 0.5]Constrained Longitudinal Data Analysis
Secondary
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 24
The DAS28-CRP is a continuous parameter based upon a statistically-derived index combining tender joints (28 joints; 0=absent, 1=present; TEN28), swollen joints (28 joints; 0=absent, 1=present; SW28), CRP (decrease indicates improvement), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0=doing very well to 100=doing very poor; GH, ). It is defined as follows: DAS28-CRP = 0.56 × SQRT(TEN28) + 0.28 × SQRT(SW28) + 0.36 × ln (CRP+1) + 0.014 × GH + 0.96. The DAS28-CRP is a scale ranging from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater RA disease activity. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Population: Due to the early termination of the study, analysis for this outcome measure was not performed according to the protocol because complete data were not available.
Secondary
Change From Baseline in the HAQ Disability Index at Week 24
The functional status of the participant was assessed using the Disability Index of the HAQ on a Likert scale. This 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. The overall score for the Disability Index is the mean of the 8 functional area scores and also ranges from 0 to 3, with a lower score indicating less disability. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Population: Due to the early termination of the study, analysis for this outcome measure was not performed according to the protocol because complete data were not available.
Secondary
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability (HAQ Disability Index) at Week 12
The functional status of the participant was assessed using the Disability Index of the HAQ on a Likert scale. This 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. The overall score for the Disability Index is the mean of the 8 functional area scores and also ranges from 0 to 3, with a lower score indicating less disability. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Randomized participants in the Base Study who received at least one dose of study drug and had both Baseline and Week 12 HAQ Disability Index measurement
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Base Study: MK-8457 | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability (HAQ Disability Index) at Week 12 | -0.67 Units on a scale |
| Base Study: Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability (HAQ Disability Index) at Week 12 | -0.26 Units on a scale |
p-value: 0.03895% CI: [-0.79, -0.02]Constrained Longitudinal Data Analysis
Secondary
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR20 Response at Week 24
ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: Due to the early termination of the study, analysis for this outcome measure was not performed according to the protocol because complete data were not available.
Secondary
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response at Week 12
ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Randomized participants in the Base Study who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline ACR50 measurement (last observation carried forward)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Base Study: MK-8457 | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response at Week 12 | 20.00 Percentage of participants |
| Base Study: Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response at Week 12 | 11.54 Percentage of participants |
p-value: 0.46895% CI: [-10.4, 27.32]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response at Week 24
ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0=Absent; 1=Present) and 2) ≥50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, 0=no pain to 100=extreme pain); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (0=doing very well to 100=doing very poor); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (0=doing very well to 100=doing very poor; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from 0=no difficulty to 24=inability to perform tasks; and e) CRP (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: Due to the early termination of the study, analysis for this outcome measure was not performed according to the protocol because complete data were not available.
Secondary
Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 12
ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Randomized participants in the Base Study who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline ACR20 measurement (last observation carried forward)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Base Study: MK-8457 | Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 12 | 26.67 Percentage of participants |
| Base Study: Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 12 | 26.92 Percentage of participants |
p-value: 0.9195% CI: [-23.52, 23.01]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel