Skip to content

Laser Ablation After Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Laser Ablation After Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01651078
Acronym
LAASR
Enrollment
44
Registered
2012-07-26
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Brain Tumors, Progression, Quality of Life, Radiation Necrosis

Keywords

Metastatic Brain Tumors, Progression, Radiation Necrosis, Quality of Life

Brief summary

The need for new technologies and devices in the field of neurosurgery is well established. In April 2013, FDA cleared NeuroBlate™ System, minimally invasive robotic laser thermotherapy tool. It employs a pulsed surgical laser to deliver targeted energy to abnormal brain tissue caused by tumors and lesions. This post-marketing, multi-center study will include patients with metastatic tumors who failed stereotactic radiosurgery and are already scheduled for NeuroBlate procedure. The study will collect clinical outcome, Quality of Life (QoL) and, where feasible, healthcare utilization data for publication.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Monteris Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient has signed and received a copy of the Informed Consent Form 2. Patient may have up to 3 target supratentorial metastatic lesions previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, with radiological evidence of progression, pseudoprogression or radionecrosis. Subject may have additional non target lesions present as long as they are not expected (in Investigator's judgment) to contribute to symptomatology during the course of the study or confound interpretation of radiological and clinical measures. 3. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 60. Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Females who are pregnant, breast feeding, or plan to become pregnant in the 6 months following index procedure. 2. Leptomeningeal metastases. 3. Uncontrolled infectious process. 4. Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic \>180 mm Hg), angina pectoris, or cardiac dysrhythmia, or recent (within 6 weeks) history of intracranial hemorrhage. 5. Serious infection, immunosuppression or concurrent medical condition (chronic or acute in nature) that may prevent safe participation or ability to meet follow-up requirements. 6. Abnormal absolute neutrophil count (ANC\<1000/mm), platelets (\<100,000/mm) or the administration of antiplatelet agents (aspirin, plavix etc) or anticoagulation within 7 days prior to treatment. 7. Inadequate bone marrow, liver and renal function (e.g., total bilirubin \> 1.5 x ULN; AST, ALT \> 2.5 x ULN; alkaline phosphatase \> 2.5 x ULN; serum creatinine \> 1.5 x ULN).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Images were collected at 12 and 26 weeks post index procedure.To describe local (CNS) progression-free survival rate in patients with failed radiosurgery for brain metastases treated with the NeuroBlate System. Sites were requested to submit imaging to a centralized core laboratory for analysis. A total of 27 patients had images submitted--27/42 (64%) of patients submitted follow-up images at 12-weeks and 16/42 (38%) patients submitted follow-up imaging at 26 weeks. Due to the low submission of follow-up images at 26-weeks, 12-weeks and last follow-up are reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life (Change in The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) Score.baseline, 12 and 26 weeks post index procedureFACT-Br questionnaire sub-scores (Physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, brain cancer subscale) are summed together, leading to a FACT-Br total score on a scale from 0-200; larger scores indicate better overall quality of life. This outcome measured the FACT-Br score change from Baseline at both 12 and 26 weeks post NeuroBlate procedure (values at 12 and 26 weeks, respectively, minus value at baseline). Version 4 of the Fact-BR scoring guidelines were used.
Overall Survival12 and 26 weeks post index procedureTo describe/estimate the overall survival after the NeuroBlate Procedure.
Percentage of Patients With Laser Ablation Related Adverse EventsAll adverse events reported through 26 weeks post index procedureTo continue to monitor factors impacting the safe and efficacious use of NeuroBlate

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Forty-four (44) patients were enrolled between October 2012 and December 2015 across six centers in the United States (per the protocol, LAASR enrolled all patients who were scheduled to undergo a NeuroBlate procedure). Forty-two (42) patients underwent the procedure and were followed under the protocol as the NeuroBlate Procedure treatment arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Main Cohort
Patients with radiographic evidence of lesion regrowth following prior treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (regardless of the process being suspected recurrent or progressive brain metastasis versus radiation necrosis) and who already scheduled for NeuroBlate procedure.
42
Total42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMain Cohort
Age, Continuous60 years
Biopsy-confirmed radiation necrosis or metastatic brain tumor39 patients
Region of Enrollment
United States
42 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
8 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

To describe local (CNS) progression-free survival rate in patients with failed radiosurgery for brain metastases treated with the NeuroBlate System. Sites were requested to submit imaging to a centralized core laboratory for analysis. A total of 27 patients had images submitted--27/42 (64%) of patients submitted follow-up images at 12-weeks and 16/42 (38%) patients submitted follow-up imaging at 26 weeks. Due to the low submission of follow-up images at 26-weeks, 12-weeks and last follow-up are reported.

Time frame: Images were collected at 12 and 26 weeks post index procedure.

Population: Sites were requested to submit imaging to a centralized core laboratory for analysis. A total of 27 patients had images submitted--27/42 (64%) of patients submitted follow-up images at 12-weeks and 16/42 (38%) patients submitted follow-up imaging at 26 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NeuroBlate ProcedurePercentage of Patients With Progression-Free Survival (PFS)12-weeks74 percentage of patients
NeuroBlate ProcedurePercentage of Patients With Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Last Follow-up74 percentage of patients
Secondary

Overall Survival

To describe/estimate the overall survival after the NeuroBlate Procedure.

Time frame: 12 and 26 weeks post index procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NeuroBlate ProcedureOverall Survival12-week Kaplan-Meier survival86.5 percentage of patients
NeuroBlate ProcedureOverall Survival26-week Kaplan-Meier survival72.2 percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Laser Ablation Related Adverse Events

To continue to monitor factors impacting the safe and efficacious use of NeuroBlate

Time frame: All adverse events reported through 26 weeks post index procedure

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NeuroBlate ProcedurePercentage of Patients With Laser Ablation Related Adverse EventsSerious events associated with NeuroBlate0 Participants
NeuroBlate ProcedurePercentage of Patients With Laser Ablation Related Adverse EventsNon-serious events associated with NeuroBlate5 Participants
NeuroBlate ProcedurePercentage of Patients With Laser Ablation Related Adverse EventsNo NeuroBlate-related adverse event37 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Life (Change in The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) Score.

FACT-Br questionnaire sub-scores (Physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, brain cancer subscale) are summed together, leading to a FACT-Br total score on a scale from 0-200; larger scores indicate better overall quality of life. This outcome measured the FACT-Br score change from Baseline at both 12 and 26 weeks post NeuroBlate procedure (values at 12 and 26 weeks, respectively, minus value at baseline). Version 4 of the Fact-BR scoring guidelines were used.

Time frame: baseline, 12 and 26 weeks post index procedure

Population: Due to study attrition, the full cohort was unavailable for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NeuroBlate ProcedureQuality of Life (Change in The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) Score.Change in 12-week FACT-Br from Baseline3.8 change in FACT-Br score
NeuroBlate ProcedureQuality of Life (Change in The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) Score.Change in 26-week FACT-Br from Baseline7.0 change in FACT-Br score

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026