Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Comparing 5% Monoxidil Milky Lotion Versus 5% Minoxidil Solution in Androgenetic Alopecia

An Efficacy and Safety Pilot Study Comparing 5% Monoxidil Milky Lotion Versus 5% Minoxidil Solution in Treatment of AGA

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01650272
Enrollment
20
Registered
2012-07-26
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2013-04-30
Last updated
2012-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adverse Effects, Objective (Goal), Self-Assessment

Brief summary

5% Minoxidil lotion was approved for using to stimulate hair growth in male androgenetic alopecia by US FDA science 1988. The mechanism of action still unclear. In general the 5% Minoxidil in solution is the first choice preparation for treatment, therefore allergic contact dermatitis to solution was report up to 5.7% (Ebner H. et al,1995). Propylene glycol which is the main solvent of these solution, was the main responsible to allergic contact dermatitis with positive patch test up to 81.8% (Friedman ES. et al. 2002) One of the alternative solution using butylene glycol as the solvent was invented to solve the problem. In Siriraj hospital the investigators using this new solvent and made our in house product called 5% Minoxidil milky lotion. However the efficacy and safety of the new solution have not been investigated. This study is conducted to evaluated efficacy and safety of 5% Minoxidil milky lotion compare with the classic solution in male androgenetic alopecia.

Detailed description

The 5% Minoxidil in solution is the first choice preparation for treatment for Androgenetic Alopecia (AGA), 5% Minoxidil milky lotion is the alternative solution using butylene glycol as the solvent to solve allergic contact dermatitis problem. In Siriraj hospital the investigators using this new solvent and made our in house product called he efficacy and safety of the new solution have not been investigated. This study is conducted to evaluated efficacy and safety of 5% Minoxidil milky lotion compare with the classic solution in male androgenetic alopecia.

Interventions

DRUG5% MInoxidil milky lotion

Patient receive 5% MInoxidil milky lotion (Butylene glycol solvent)

DRUG5% Minoxidil solution

Patient receive 5% Minoxidil solution (Propylene glycol solvent )

Sponsors

Siriraj Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* New case male AGA * Classification Norwood III vertex or IV

Exclusion criteria

* Have previous AGA treatment in 6 month prior * Complicated case with other disease condition effect hair such as Anemia, DM, Chronic alcoholism, Autoimmune disease, Thyroid disease, previous GI surgery etc. * Other scalp lesion such as Psoriasis, Tinea capsitis * Psychological disorder including trichotillomania

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of 5%Minoxidil milky lotion compare to 5%Minoxidil solution6 month1. Target area hair evaluation * Hair density (Digital image, DinoLite pro) * Hair diameter (Electronic outside micrometer) * Hair count vellus/ non-vellus ratio 2. Global photographic review (by 2 Experienced Dermatologist) 3. Patient self evaluation ( 7point scale )

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Side effect of topical minoxidil6 monthRecord side effect such as Erythema, Dryness, Pruritus, Scaling, etc.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Weight of topical minoxidil milky lotion / minoxidil lotion6 monthMeasure weight of topical minoxidil milky lotion / minoxidil lotion to confirm using of patient

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Primary ContactRattapon Thuangtong, MD
rattaponthuangtong@yahoo.com+662 4194333
Backup ContactKanchalit Thanomkitti, MD, PhD
kanchalitt@hotmail.com+668 95290298

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026