Skip to content

Ultrasound Evaluation of Endotracheal Tube Depth

Ultrasound Evaluation of Endotracheal Tube Depth for Proper Tube Placement in Different Patient Groups

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01649882
Enrollment
100
Registered
2012-07-25
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2015-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation, Intratracheal

Keywords

endotracheal tube position, intubation

Brief summary

Correct positioning of the endotracheal tube (ETT) is crucial to ensure safe ventilation. To date, no test that can verify this right after intubation at the bedside exists. Indirect tests have false negative and positive results leading to complications or at least difficulties in performing effective ventilation of patients. Bedside ultrasound could fill this need. Although bedside ultrasound may not be possible or useful in routine intubations, it may prove useful in difficult or questionable cases, where current clinical exams/techniques may not offer a reliable indication of endotracheal tube depth.

Detailed description

Ultrasound is able to visualize some parts of the trachea and the ETT therein and although the actual structures of interest (ETT tip and carina) are difficult or impossible to visualize reliably (due to their air contents reflecting ultrasound beams) one can use surrogates: The cuff of the ETT can be visualized as it is in- or deflated or it can be filled with an air-fluid(saline) mixture to delineate it inside the trachea. For the same reason (air reflecting ultrasound beams) the carina is difficult to visualize and one can use the aortic arch which is positioned just anterior to it instead. This study apart from determining feasibility of the method may produce enough data from ultrasound exams to develop/derive a more pre-cise algorithm than available today aiding in positioning the endotracheal tube in regards to anatomic-al landmarks (teeth, gums, lips) even without the use of ultrasound.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUS ETT (ultrasound endotracheal tube)

Subjects will have a brief (\< 15 minutes) ultrasound exam of the neck after intubation. The cuff of the endotracheal tube as well as the aortic arch will be identified. The distance between the two structures will be measured and recorded.

Sponsors

Kai Schoenhage
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* requiring anesthesia with an endotracheal tube placed for surgical or procedural purposes * elective or stable and awake for urgent or emergent surgeries

Exclusion criteria

* known tracheal deformities * thoracic aortic aneurysm * neck/chest tissue thickness making U/S scanning difficult * severe trauma, head injuries or any procedures that require immediate surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
concomitant visualization of endotracheal tube cuff and aortic arch by ultrasound in situ15 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
distance between endotracheal tube cuff and aortic arch by ultrasound in situ15 minutes

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactKai Schoenhage, MD
kschoenhage@anesth.arizona.edu(520) 626-7221

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026