Skip to content

A 16 Weeks Study on Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Empagliflozin (BI 10773) (Once Daily Versus Twice Daily) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Preexisting Metformin Therapy

A Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study of Oral Administration of Empagliflozin Twice Daily Versus Once Daily in Two Different Daily Doses Over 16 Weeks as add-on Therapy to a Twice Daily Dosing Regimen of Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Insufficient Glycaemic Control

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01649297
Enrollment
983
Registered
2012-07-25
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2015-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of two doses (high and low) of empagliflozin as add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and insufficient glycaemic control. Both doses may be given once daily or split to a twice daily dosage. This results in 4 different dosage regimens of empagliflozin (high dose once daily or split vs. low dose once daily or split). This is done to evaluate whether a twice daily dose regimen of empagliflozin results in a loss of efficacy relative to once daily dosing when given on top of metformin background therapy.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Patients receive placebo matching empagliflozin (low dose qd)

DRUGempagliflozin (low dose qd)

Patients receive Empagliflozin low dose once daily

DRUGEmpagliflozin (high dose qd)

Patients receive Empagliflozin high dose once daily

DRUGempagliflozin (high dose bid)

Patients receive Empagliflozin high dose split twice daily

DRUGempagliflozin (low dose bid)

Patients receive Empagliflozin low dose split twice daily

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. confirmed diagnosis of T2DM 2. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) \>=7.0 and \<=10/0% at Visit 1 3. Metformin therapy (at least 1500 mg/day, BID) 4. age\>=18 at Visit 1 5. body mass index \<=45 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

1. estimated creatinine clearance rate (eCCr) \<60 ml/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula) screening and/or run-in 2. a confirmed glucose level \>240 mg/dl (\>13.3 mmol/L) after an overnight fast during placebo run-in

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Change From Baseline at Week 16Baseline and 16 weeksChange from baseline in HbA1c (%) after 16 weeks of treatment. The term 'baseline' refers to the last observation prior to the first intake of any randomised study medication. Means provided are the adjusted means.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline at Week 16Baseline and 16 weeksChange from baseline in FPG (mg/dL) after 16 weeks of treatment. The term 'baseline' refers to the last observation prior to the first intake of any randomised study medication. Means provided are the adjusted means.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Estonia, France, Georgia, Germany, Guatemala, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Empa 12.5mg BID
Oral administration of Empagliflozin (Empa) 12.5 mg twice daily (BID)
215
Empa 25mg QD
Oral administration of Empagliflozin (Empa) 25 mg once daily (QD)
214
Empa 5mg BID
Oral administration of Empagliflozin (Empa) 5 mg twice daily (BID)
215
Empa 10mg QD
Oral administration of Empagliflozin (Empa) 10 mg once daily (QD)
214
Placebo
Oral administration of Placebo tablets matching empagliflozin 25 mg, 10 mg, 5 mg, and 2.5 mg
107
Total965

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event554131
Overall StudyFor other reason41200
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy00001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11430
Overall StudyNon compliant with Protocol10321
Overall StudyPatient withdrawal (not due to AE)36411

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEmpa 12.5mg BIDEmpa 25mg QDEmpa 5mg BIDEmpa 10mg QDPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
58.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
92 Participants100 Participants95 Participants106 Participants52 Participants445 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
123 Participants114 Participants120 Participants108 Participants55 Participants520 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 21910 / 2188 / 21915 / 2204 / 107
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 2192 / 2187 / 2195 / 2201 / 107

Outcome results

Primary

HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Change From Baseline at Week 16

Change from baseline in HbA1c (%) after 16 weeks of treatment. The term 'baseline' refers to the last observation prior to the first intake of any randomised study medication. Means provided are the adjusted means.

Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) is the basis for the intention-to-treat analysis. FAS with last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation is used as the primary method of accounting for missing data.~Values after the patient started rescue medication were excluded from analysis (and imputed with an LOCF procedure).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Empa 12.5mg BIDHbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.83 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.05
Empa 25mg QDHbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.72 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.05
Empa 5mg BIDHbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.66 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.05
Empa 10mg QDHbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.64 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboHbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.22 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.07
Comparison: The primary objective was to test the non-inferiority of empagliflozin 5 mg BID versus empagliflozin 10 mg QD, and non-inferiority of empagliflozin 12.5 mg BID versus empagliflozin 25 mg QD, assuming a non-inferiority margin of 0.35%p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.16, 0.13]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary objective was to test the non-inferiority of empagliflozin 5 mg BID versus empagliflozin 10 mg QD, and non-inferiority of empagliflozin 12.5 mg BID versus empagliflozin 25 mg QD, assuming a non-inferiority margin of 0.35%p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.26, 0.03]ANCOVA
Comparison: Superiority of once daily dose of empagliflozin (10 mg and 25 mg) versus placebo and superiority of twice daily dose of empagliflozin (5 mg and 12.5 mg) versus placebo in reducing HbA1c after 16 weeks of treatment was tested in an exploratory manner, to demonstrate assay sensitivity against placebo at 0.05 level (two-sided).p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.79, -0.44]ANCOVA
Comparison: Superiority of once daily dose of empagliflozin (10 mg and 25 mg) versus placebo and superiority of twice daily dose of empagliflozin (5 mg and 12.5 mg) versus placebo in reducing HbA1c after 16 weeks of treatment was tested in an exploratory manner, to demonstrate assay sensitivity against placebo at 0.05 level (two-sided).p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.68, -0.32]ANCOVA
Comparison: Superiority of once daily dose of empagliflozin (10 mg and 25 mg) versus placebo and superiority of twice daily dose of empagliflozin (5 mg and 12.5 mg) versus placebo in reducing HbA1c after 16 weeks of treatment was tested in an exploratory manner, to demonstrate assay sensitivity against placebo at 0.05 level (two-sided).p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.62, -0.27]ANCOVA
Comparison: Superiority of once daily dose of empagliflozin (10 mg and 25 mg) versus placebo and superiority of twice daily dose of empagliflozin (5 mg and 12.5 mg) versus placebo in reducing HbA1c after 16 weeks of treatment was tested in an exploratory manner, to demonstrate assay sensitivity against placebo at 0.05 level (two-sided).p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.6, -0.25]ANCOVA
Secondary

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline at Week 16

Change from baseline in FPG (mg/dL) after 16 weeks of treatment. The term 'baseline' refers to the last observation prior to the first intake of any randomised study medication. Means provided are the adjusted means.

Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks

Population: FAS with LOCF has been used for FPG analyses

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Empa 12.5mg BIDFasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline at Week 16-27.7 mg/dLStandard Error 2
Empa 25mg QDFasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline at Week 16-22.7 mg/dLStandard Error 2
Empa 5mg BIDFasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline at Week 16-21.2 mg/dLStandard Error 2
Empa 10mg QDFasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline at Week 16-17.6 mg/dLStandard Error 2
PlaceboFasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.2 mg/dLStandard Error 2.8
95% CI: [-9, 1.8]ANCOVA
95% CI: [-10.4, 0.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Superiority of once daily dose of empagliflozin (10 mg and 25 mg) versus placebo and superiority of twice daily dose of empagliflozin (5 mg and 12.5 mg) versus placebo in reducing FPG after 16 weeks of treatment was tested in an exploratory manner, to demonstrate assay sensitivity against placebo at 0.05 level (two-sided)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-34.2, -20.9]ANCOVA
Comparison: Superiority of once daily dose of empagliflozin (10 mg and 25 mg) versus placebo and superiority of twice daily dose of empagliflozin (5 mg and 12.5 mg) versus placebo in reducing FPG after 16 weeks of treatment was tested in an exploratory manner, to demonstrate assay sensitivity against placebo at 0.05 level (two-sided)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-29.2, -15.9]ANCOVA
Comparison: Superiority of once daily dose of empagliflozin (10 mg and 25 mg) versus placebo and superiority of twice daily dose of empagliflozin (5 mg and 12.5 mg) versus placebo in reducing FPG after 16 weeks of treatment was tested in an exploratory manner, to demonstrate assay sensitivity against placebo at 0.05 level (two-sided)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-27.7, -14.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Superiority of once daily dose of empagliflozin (10 mg and 25 mg) versus placebo and superiority of twice daily dose of empagliflozin (5 mg and 12.5 mg) versus placebo in reducing FPG after 16 weeks of treatment was tested in an exploratory manner, to demonstrate assay sensitivity against placebo at 0.05 level (two-sided)p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-24.1, -10.8]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026