Skip to content

Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation and Rectoanal Repair Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy

Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation and Rectoanal Repair Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01647763
Enrollment
84
Registered
2012-07-24
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2023-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemorrhoids

Keywords

Hemorrhoids

Brief summary

Background: Hemorrhoids of grade 3 and 4 can be treated either by conventional, rather invasive procedures, like Milligan-Morgan or Ferguson or by modern, less invasive procedures with less postoperative pain. Doppler guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation and stapled hemorrhoidopexy are examples for such modern procedures. Hemorrhoidal artery ligation causes less post operative pain than stapled hemorrhoidopexy, however the former has a higher recurrence rate. Combining hemorrhoidal artery ligation with rectoanal repair should reduce the recurrence rate without increasing the post operative pain. Hypothesis and aim: The study tries to prove the assumption that combined hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair cause less pain and have less post operative complications than stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHemorrhoidal artery ligation with rectoanal repair

Hemorrhoidal arteries will be detected using an ultrasound Doppler probe. The arteries will be sutured with at least 4 Z-sutures. In the area with the 3 largest knots a purse string suture will be placed.

A purse string suture will be placed just below the hemorrhoidal cushion. Fixing the suture around the shaft of a circular PPH 03 stapler (Ethicon Endo-Surgery). Hemorrhoids will be removed by firing the stapler. Sufficiency of the stapler line will be examined through a proctoscope. Eventual sources of bleeding will be sutured.

Sponsors

Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* hemorrhoids grade 3 * no active anti-coagulation treatment * no hemorrhoidal recurrence * no previous surgery on rectum or anus * no previous local radiotherapy * no mental incapacities, good study compliance can be expected * no severe incontinence (Wexner score \> 12) * no severe comorbidities * no inflammatory anal diseases (abscesses, fistulas) * informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* patient wish * inoperability with the assigned intervention, switching to other treatment method

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain POD1between 6:00 am and 8:00 am the day after surgeryVisual analogue scale (VAS). Additionally recording of the pain medication used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain 30d30 days after surgeryvisual analogue scale
Pain 1y1 year after surgeryvisual analogue scale
Pain 2y2 years after surgeryvisual analogue scale
post operative surgical complicationswithin 30 post operative daysNumber and severity according to the Dindo classification (Ann Surg 240:205)
Pain after 8h8 hours after surgeryMeasuring post operative pain using the visual analogue scale (0 - 10). Additionally recording of the pain medication used.
Continence 30d30 days after surgeryPhysician obtains data to calculate the Wexner Score (Dis Colon Rectum 36:77). Score will be compared with pre-operative score.
Continence 1y1 year after surgeryWexner score
Continence 2y2 years after surgeryWexner score Additionally anorectal manometry (results will be compared with pre-operative data).
duration of medical leaveup to 3 months after surgerydata will be obtained from primary care physician

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026