Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of Ozanimod in Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapy With RPC1063 in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01647516
Acronym
Touchstone
Enrollment
199
Registered
2012-07-23
Start date
2012-12-26
Completion date
2019-08-30
Last updated
2021-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether RPC1063 is effective in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC).

Interventions

DRUGOzanimod

Ozanimod capsules by mouth daily.

DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Celgene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 73 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ulcerative colitis (UC) confirmed on endoscopy * Moderately to severely active UC (Mayo score 6-12)

Exclusion criteria

* Current use of anti-TNF agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission Based on the Central Read of the Mayo Score (MS), at Week 8Week 8Clinical Remission was defined as: Mayo score of \<2 points and with no individual subscore of \> 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Clinical Remission was based on the 4-component Mayo definition.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8Baseline to Week 8The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8Week 8Mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy subscore ≤ 1 point. Endoscopy subscores were calculated based on central endoscopy reading. The endoscopy scale: 0 = Normal or inactive disease 1. = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability) 2. = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions) 3. = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission in the Mayo Score at Week 32Week 32Clinical Remission was defined as: Mayo score of \<2 points and with no individual subscore of \> 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a score of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 32Week 32Clinical response was defined as a reduction from baseline in Mayo score ≥3 points and ≥30%, and a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Mayo Score (MS) at Week 8Week 8Clinical response was defined as a reduction from baseline in Mayo score ≥3 points and ≥30%, and a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. Clinical Respone was based on the 4-component Mayo definition.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction PeriodFrom the first dose of investigational product (IP) up to 90 days after the last dose of IP or at follow-up visit; the mean total duration of IP exposure was 52.8 days, 56.1 days and 50.8 days respectively for 0.5 mg, 1 mg ozanimod and placeboA TEAE was defined as any event with an onset date on or after first dose date or any ongoing event on the first dose date that worsens in severity after first dose date and until 90 days following the last dose of treatment with the study drug. earlier. A serious AE = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator and based on the following scale: Mild = an AE usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate = an AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe = an AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance PeriodFrom the first dose of IP up to 90 days after the last dose of IP or at follow-up visit; the mean total duration of IP exposure was 156.3 days, 171.1 days and 154.5 days respectively for 0.5 mg, 1 mg ozanimod and placebo.A TEAE was defined as any event with an onset date on or after first dose date or any ongoing event on the first dose date that worsens in severity after first dose date and until 90 days following the last dose of treatment with the study drug. earlier. A serious AE = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator and based on the following scale: Mild = an AE usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate = an AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe = an AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities.
Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)From the first dose of IP until 90 days after the last dose of IP or at follow-up visit; the mean total duration of study drug exposure in the OLP was 2.42 yearsA TEAE was defined as any event with an onset date on or after first dose date or any ongoing event on the first dose date that worsens in severity after first dose date and until 90 days following the last dose of treatment with the study drug. earlier. A serious AE = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator and based on the following scale: Mild = an AE usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate = an AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe = an AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities.
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 32Week 32Mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy subscore ≤ 1 point. Endoscopy subscores were calculated based on central endoscopy reading. The endoscopy scale: 0 = Normal or inactive disease 1. = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability) 2. = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions) 3. = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration)

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, South Korea, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at 57 sites from 13 countries located in Europe, North America, and the Asia-Pacific region.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio on Day 1 to placebo, ozanimod 0.5 mg, or ozanimod 1 mg capsules and were stratified by whether they had received anti-tumor necrosis factor class of therapy (yes vs no).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received identically matching placebo capsules daily for 9 weeks during the induction period (weeks 0 to 9). Participants who completed the induction period and were responders, continued to receive identically matching placebo tablets during the maintenance period (weeks 9-32).
65
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of ozanimod hydrochloride daily during the induction period weeks 0-9 (an initial 8-day dose escalation regimen in the induction period that consisted of 4 days of ozanimod HCl 0.25 mg (equivalent to ozanimod 0.23 mg), followed by 3 days of ozanimod HCl 0.5 mg, (equivalent to ozanimod 0.46 mg) followed by the assigned treatment level for at least 8 weeks. Participants who completed the induction period and were responders at week 8, continued to receive the same dose of ozanimod during the maintenance period up to week 32.
65
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg
Participants received 1 mg capsules of ozanimod hydrochloride daily during the induction period weeks 0-9 (an initial 8-day dose escalation regimen in the induction period that consisted of 4 days of ozanimod HCl 0.25 mg (equivalent to ozanimod 0.23 mg), followed by 3 days of ozanimod HCl 0.5 mg, (equivalent to ozanimod 0.46 mg) followed by the assigned treatment level for at least 8 weeks. Participants who completed the induction period and were responders at week 8, continued to receive the same dose of ozanimod during the maintenance period up to week 32.
67
Total197

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Induction Period (IP)Adverse Event120000
Induction Period (IP)Lack of Efficacy100000
Induction Period (IP)No study drug received110000
Induction Period (IP)Participant Choice001000
Induction Period (IP)Physician Decision200000
Induction Period (IP)Withdrawal by Subject103000
Maintenance Period (MP)Adverse Event210000
Maintenance Period (MP)Lack of Efficacy141000
Maintenance Period (MP)Non-compliance100000
Maintenance Period (MP)Withdrawal by Subject011000
Open-Label PeriodAdverse Event000563
Open-Label PeriodLack of Efficacy0007910
Open-Label PeriodLost to Follow-up000101
Open-Label PeriodNo completion / discontinuation visit000021
Open-Label PeriodNon-compliance000101
Open-Label PeriodParticipant Choice to Stop Study Drug0007910
Open-Label PeriodPhysician Decision000110
Open-Label PeriodPregnancy000001
Open-Label PeriodSponsor Termination; moved to 3102 study000181323
Open-Label PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0009116

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboOzanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgOzanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgTotal
Age, Continuous41.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
38.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.06
41.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.01
40.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.82
Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use
6-Mercaptopurine
2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use
Aminosalycylates
63 Participants63 Participants67 Participants193 Participants
Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use
Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors (Anti-TNF)
10 Participants12 Participants15 Participants37 Participants
Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use
Azathioprine
17 Participants23 Participants19 Participants59 Participants
Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use
Methotrexate
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use
Other Immunomodulators
6 Participants5 Participants3 Participants14 Participants
Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use
Systemic Corticosteroids
52 Participants49 Participants52 Participants153 Participants
Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use
Topical Medication
3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
63 Participants64 Participants67 Participants194 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Mayo Score8.6 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.51
8.3 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.45
8.5 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.61
8.5 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.52
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
61 Participants59 Participants62 Participants182 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants33 Participants19 Participants82 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants32 Participants48 Participants115 Participants
Years Since Ulcerative Colitis Diagnosis6.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.46
5.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.44
6.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.76
6.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.91

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 650 / 650 / 670 / 250 / 360 / 420 / 551 / 560 / 59
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 658 / 658 / 673 / 252 / 362 / 4219 / 5517 / 5622 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 651 / 652 / 672 / 250 / 361 / 425 / 5514 / 5611 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission Based on the Central Read of the Mayo Score (MS), at Week 8

Clinical Remission was defined as: Mayo score of \<2 points and with no individual subscore of \> 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Clinical Remission was based on the 4-component Mayo definition.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: The intent to treat ( ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment. Participants with missing Mayo scores were classified as non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission Based on the Central Read of the Mayo Score (MS), at Week 86.2 Percentage of Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission Based on the Central Read of the Mayo Score (MS), at Week 813.8 Percentage of Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission Based on the Central Read of the Mayo Score (MS), at Week 816.4 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.048295% CI: [0.969, 10.984]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.142295% CI: [0.722, 8.661]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8

The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment assignment designated according to randomized treatment. Includes participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8-2.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgChange From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8-2.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgChange From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8-3.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.79
p-value: 0.0042ANCOVA
p-value: 0.1415ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)

A TEAE was defined as any event with an onset date on or after first dose date or any ongoing event on the first dose date that worsens in severity after first dose date and until 90 days following the last dose of treatment with the study drug. earlier. A serious AE = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator and based on the following scale: Mild = an AE usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate = an AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe = an AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities.

Time frame: From the first dose of IP until 90 days after the last dose of IP or at follow-up visit; the mean total duration of study drug exposure in the OLP was 2.42 years

Population: Safety population included all participants who were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of investigational product (IP). All participants in the OLE safety population received 1 mg capsules ozanimod as noted in the description.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)≥ 1 TEAE101 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE63 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)≥ 1 Severe TEAE17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)≥ 1 Possible, Probable or Related TEAE27 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)≥ 1 Related TEAE2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)≥ 1 Serious TEAE27 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)≥ 1 Related Serious TEAE0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)≥ 1 Possible, Probable or Related Serious TEAE4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of IP14 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study13 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)Death1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)1 Death Possible, Probable or Related to IP1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period

A TEAE was defined as any event with an onset date on or after first dose date or any ongoing event on the first dose date that worsens in severity after first dose date and until 90 days following the last dose of treatment with the study drug. earlier. A serious AE = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator and based on the following scale: Mild = an AE usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate = an AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe = an AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities.

Time frame: From the first dose of investigational product (IP) up to 90 days after the last dose of IP or at follow-up visit; the mean total duration of IP exposure was 52.8 days, 56.1 days and 50.8 days respectively for 0.5 mg, 1 mg ozanimod and placebo

Population: Safety population included all participants who were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of investigational product (IP).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 TEAE21 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Severe TEAE2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related TEAE2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Serious SAE4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Related Serious TEAE0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal From Study1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction PeriodDeath0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Severe TEAE1 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal From Study2 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related TEAE5 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Serious SAE1 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Related Serious TEAE0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 TEAE24 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE12 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction PeriodDeath0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Severe TEAE1 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE6 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 TEAE17 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related TEAE5 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal From Study1 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Related Serious TEAE0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period≥ 1 Serious SAE2 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction PeriodDeath0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period

A TEAE was defined as any event with an onset date on or after first dose date or any ongoing event on the first dose date that worsens in severity after first dose date and until 90 days following the last dose of treatment with the study drug. earlier. A serious AE = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator and based on the following scale: Mild = an AE usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate = an AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe = an AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities.

Time frame: From the first dose of IP up to 90 days after the last dose of IP or at follow-up visit; the mean total duration of IP exposure was 156.3 days, 171.1 days and 154.5 days respectively for 0.5 mg, 1 mg ozanimod and placebo.

Population: Safety population included all participants who were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of investigational product (IP) and who entered the maintenance period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance PeriodDeath0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Serious TEAE2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related TEAE0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Severe TEAE1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal From Study3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Related Serious TEAE0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 TEAE8 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Severe TEAE0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Related Serious TEAE0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal From Study0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance PeriodDeath0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Serious TEAE0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related TEAE0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 TEAE4 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE1 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal From Study0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related TEAE2 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 TEAE11 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Related Serious TEAE0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Serious TEAE1 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Severe TEAE1 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance PeriodDeath0 Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE5 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Mayo Score (MS) at Week 8

Clinical response was defined as a reduction from baseline in Mayo score ≥3 points and ≥30%, and a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. Clinical Respone was based on the 4-component Mayo definition.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment assignment designated according to randomized treatment. Participants with missing Mayo score were considered non-responders. Non responder imputation (NRI).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Mayo Score (MS) at Week 836.9 Percentage of Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Mayo Score (MS) at Week 853.8 Percentage of Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Mayo Score (MS) at Week 856.7 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.020795% CI: [1.093, 4.263]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.064895% CI: [0.961, 3.946]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission in the Mayo Score at Week 32

Clinical Remission was defined as: Mayo score of \<2 points and with no individual subscore of \> 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a score of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)

Time frame: Week 32

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment assignment designated according to randomized treatment. Participants with missing Mayo score were considered non-responders. Non responder imputation (NRI).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission in the Mayo Score at Week 326.2 Percentage of Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission in the Mayo Score at Week 3226.2 Percentage of Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission in the Mayo Score at Week 3220.9 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.010895% CI: [1.323, 14.186]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.002195% CI: [1.706, 17.365]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 32

Clinical response was defined as a reduction from baseline in Mayo score ≥3 points and ≥30%, and a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)

Time frame: Week 32

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment assignment designated according to randomized treatment. Participants with missing Mayo score were considered non-responders. Non responder imputation (NRI).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 3220.0 Percentage of Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 3235.4 Percentage of Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 3250.7 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.000295% CI: [1.871, 8.678]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.057195% CI: [0.974, 4.763]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 32

Mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy subscore ≤ 1 point. Endoscopy subscores were calculated based on central endoscopy reading. The endoscopy scale: 0 = Normal or inactive disease 1. = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability) 2. = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions) 3. = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration)

Time frame: Week 32

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment assignment designated according to randomized treatment. Non-responder imputation (NRI).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 3212.3 Percentage of Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 3232.3 Percentage of Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgPercentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 3232.8 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.004695% CI: [1.444, 8.762]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.006495% CI: [1.384, 8.494]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8

Mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy subscore ≤ 1 point. Endoscopy subscores were calculated based on central endoscopy reading. The endoscopy scale: 0 = Normal or inactive disease 1. = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability) 2. = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions) 3. = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration)

Time frame: Week 8

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment assignment designated according to randomized treatment. Non-responder imputation (NRI).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 812.3 Percentage of Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 827.7 Percentage of Participants
Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mgPercentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 834.3 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.002395% CI: [1.572, 9.484]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.034895% CI: [1.058, 6.621]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026