Ulcerative Colitis
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether RPC1063 is effective in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC).
Interventions
Ozanimod capsules by mouth daily.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Ulcerative colitis (UC) confirmed on endoscopy * Moderately to severely active UC (Mayo score 6-12)
Exclusion criteria
* Current use of anti-TNF agents
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission Based on the Central Read of the Mayo Score (MS), at Week 8 | Week 8 | Clinical Remission was defined as: Mayo score of \<2 points and with no individual subscore of \> 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Clinical Remission was based on the 4-component Mayo definition. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8 | Baseline to Week 8 | The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) |
| Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8 | Week 8 | Mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy subscore ≤ 1 point. Endoscopy subscores were calculated based on central endoscopy reading. The endoscopy scale: 0 = Normal or inactive disease 1. = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability) 2. = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions) 3. = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration) |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission in the Mayo Score at Week 32 | Week 32 | Clinical Remission was defined as: Mayo score of \<2 points and with no individual subscore of \> 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a score of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 32 | Week 32 | Clinical response was defined as a reduction from baseline in Mayo score ≥3 points and ≥30%, and a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Mayo Score (MS) at Week 8 | Week 8 | Clinical response was defined as a reduction from baseline in Mayo score ≥3 points and ≥30%, and a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. Clinical Respone was based on the 4-component Mayo definition. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | From the first dose of investigational product (IP) up to 90 days after the last dose of IP or at follow-up visit; the mean total duration of IP exposure was 52.8 days, 56.1 days and 50.8 days respectively for 0.5 mg, 1 mg ozanimod and placebo | A TEAE was defined as any event with an onset date on or after first dose date or any ongoing event on the first dose date that worsens in severity after first dose date and until 90 days following the last dose of treatment with the study drug. earlier. A serious AE = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator and based on the following scale: Mild = an AE usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate = an AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe = an AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | From the first dose of IP up to 90 days after the last dose of IP or at follow-up visit; the mean total duration of IP exposure was 156.3 days, 171.1 days and 154.5 days respectively for 0.5 mg, 1 mg ozanimod and placebo. | A TEAE was defined as any event with an onset date on or after first dose date or any ongoing event on the first dose date that worsens in severity after first dose date and until 90 days following the last dose of treatment with the study drug. earlier. A serious AE = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator and based on the following scale: Mild = an AE usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate = an AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe = an AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities. |
| Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | From the first dose of IP until 90 days after the last dose of IP or at follow-up visit; the mean total duration of study drug exposure in the OLP was 2.42 years | A TEAE was defined as any event with an onset date on or after first dose date or any ongoing event on the first dose date that worsens in severity after first dose date and until 90 days following the last dose of treatment with the study drug. earlier. A serious AE = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator and based on the following scale: Mild = an AE usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate = an AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe = an AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities. |
| Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 32 | Week 32 | Mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy subscore ≤ 1 point. Endoscopy subscores were calculated based on central endoscopy reading. The endoscopy scale: 0 = Normal or inactive disease 1. = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability) 2. = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions) 3. = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration) |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, South Korea, Ukraine, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were enrolled at 57 sites from 13 countries located in Europe, North America, and the Asia-Pacific region.
Pre-assignment details
Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio on Day 1 to placebo, ozanimod 0.5 mg, or ozanimod 1 mg capsules and were stratified by whether they had received anti-tumor necrosis factor class of therapy (yes vs no).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants received identically matching placebo capsules daily for 9 weeks during the induction period (weeks 0 to 9). Participants who completed the induction period and were responders, continued to receive identically matching placebo tablets during the maintenance period (weeks 9-32). | 65 |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of ozanimod hydrochloride daily during the induction period weeks 0-9 (an initial 8-day dose escalation regimen in the induction period that consisted of 4 days of ozanimod HCl 0.25 mg (equivalent to ozanimod 0.23 mg), followed by 3 days of ozanimod HCl 0.5 mg, (equivalent to ozanimod 0.46 mg) followed by the assigned treatment level for at least 8 weeks. Participants who completed the induction period and were responders at week 8, continued to receive the same dose of ozanimod during the maintenance period up to week 32. | 65 |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg Participants received 1 mg capsules of ozanimod hydrochloride daily during the induction period weeks 0-9 (an initial 8-day dose escalation regimen in the induction period that consisted of 4 days of ozanimod HCl 0.25 mg (equivalent to ozanimod 0.23 mg), followed by 3 days of ozanimod HCl 0.5 mg, (equivalent to ozanimod 0.46 mg) followed by the assigned treatment level for at least 8 weeks. Participants who completed the induction period and were responders at week 8, continued to receive the same dose of ozanimod during the maintenance period up to week 32. | 67 |
| Total | 197 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction Period (IP) | Adverse Event | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Induction Period (IP) | Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Induction Period (IP) | No study drug received | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Induction Period (IP) | Participant Choice | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Induction Period (IP) | Physician Decision | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Induction Period (IP) | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maintenance Period (MP) | Adverse Event | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maintenance Period (MP) | Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maintenance Period (MP) | Non-compliance | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maintenance Period (MP) | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Open-Label Period | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Open-Label Period | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 10 |
| Open-Label Period | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Open-Label Period | No completion / discontinuation visit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Open-Label Period | Non-compliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Open-Label Period | Participant Choice to Stop Study Drug | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 10 |
| Open-Label Period | Physician Decision | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Open-Label Period | Pregnancy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Open-Label Period | Sponsor Termination; moved to 3102 study | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 13 | 23 |
| Open-Label Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 6 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 41.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 | 38.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.06 | 41.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.01 | 40.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.82 |
| Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use 6-Mercaptopurine | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 5 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use Aminosalycylates | 63 Participants | 63 Participants | 67 Participants | 193 Participants |
| Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors (Anti-TNF) | 10 Participants | 12 Participants | 15 Participants | 37 Participants |
| Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use Azathioprine | 17 Participants | 23 Participants | 19 Participants | 59 Participants |
| Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use Methotrexate | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use Other Immunomodulators | 6 Participants | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use Systemic Corticosteroids | 52 Participants | 49 Participants | 52 Participants | 153 Participants |
| Any Prior Ulcerative Colitis Medication Use Topical Medication | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 63 Participants | 64 Participants | 67 Participants | 194 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Mayo Score | 8.6 Units on a Scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.51 | 8.3 Units on a Scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.45 | 8.5 Units on a Scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.61 | 8.5 Units on a Scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.52 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Missing | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 61 Participants | 59 Participants | 62 Participants | 182 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 30 Participants | 33 Participants | 19 Participants | 82 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 35 Participants | 32 Participants | 48 Participants | 115 Participants |
| Years Since Ulcerative Colitis Diagnosis | 6.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.46 | 5.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.44 | 6.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.76 | 6.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.91 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 65 | 0 / 65 | 0 / 67 | 0 / 25 | 0 / 36 | 0 / 42 | 0 / 55 | 1 / 56 | 0 / 59 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 9 / 65 | 8 / 65 | 8 / 67 | 3 / 25 | 2 / 36 | 2 / 42 | 19 / 55 | 17 / 56 | 22 / 59 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 4 / 65 | 1 / 65 | 2 / 67 | 2 / 25 | 0 / 36 | 1 / 42 | 5 / 55 | 14 / 56 | 11 / 59 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission Based on the Central Read of the Mayo Score (MS), at Week 8
Clinical Remission was defined as: Mayo score of \<2 points and with no individual subscore of \> 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Clinical Remission was based on the 4-component Mayo definition.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: The intent to treat ( ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment. Participants with missing Mayo scores were classified as non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission Based on the Central Read of the Mayo Score (MS), at Week 8 | 6.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission Based on the Central Read of the Mayo Score (MS), at Week 8 | 13.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission Based on the Central Read of the Mayo Score (MS), at Week 8 | 16.4 Percentage of Participants |
Change From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8
The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment assignment designated according to randomized treatment. Includes participants with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8 | -2.0 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.52 |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Change From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8 | -2.6 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.92 |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Change From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8 | -3.4 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP)
A TEAE was defined as any event with an onset date on or after first dose date or any ongoing event on the first dose date that worsens in severity after first dose date and until 90 days following the last dose of treatment with the study drug. earlier. A serious AE = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator and based on the following scale: Mild = an AE usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate = an AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe = an AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities.
Time frame: From the first dose of IP until 90 days after the last dose of IP or at follow-up visit; the mean total duration of study drug exposure in the OLP was 2.42 years
Population: Safety population included all participants who were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of investigational product (IP). All participants in the OLE safety population received 1 mg capsules ozanimod as noted in the description.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | ≥ 1 TEAE | 101 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | ≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE | 63 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | ≥ 1 Severe TEAE | 17 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | ≥ 1 Possible, Probable or Related TEAE | 27 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | ≥ 1 Related TEAE | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | ≥ 1 Serious TEAE | 27 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | ≥ 1 Related Serious TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | ≥ 1 Possible, Probable or Related Serious TEAE | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | ≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of IP | 14 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | ≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study | 13 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | Death | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With TEAE During the Open-Label Treatment Period (OLP) | 1 Death Possible, Probable or Related to IP | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period
A TEAE was defined as any event with an onset date on or after first dose date or any ongoing event on the first dose date that worsens in severity after first dose date and until 90 days following the last dose of treatment with the study drug. earlier. A serious AE = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator and based on the following scale: Mild = an AE usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate = an AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe = an AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities.
Time frame: From the first dose of investigational product (IP) up to 90 days after the last dose of IP or at follow-up visit; the mean total duration of IP exposure was 52.8 days, 56.1 days and 50.8 days respectively for 0.5 mg, 1 mg ozanimod and placebo
Population: Safety population included all participants who were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of investigational product (IP).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 TEAE | 21 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE | 7 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Severe TEAE | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related TEAE | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Serious SAE | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Related Serious TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal From Study | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | Death | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Severe TEAE | 1 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal From Study | 2 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related TEAE | 5 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Serious SAE | 1 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Related Serious TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 TEAE | 24 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE | 12 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | Death | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Severe TEAE | 1 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE | 6 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 TEAE | 17 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related TEAE | 5 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal From Study | 1 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Related Serious TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | ≥ 1 Serious SAE | 2 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Induction Period | Death | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period
A TEAE was defined as any event with an onset date on or after first dose date or any ongoing event on the first dose date that worsens in severity after first dose date and until 90 days following the last dose of treatment with the study drug. earlier. A serious AE = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator and based on the following scale: Mild = an AE usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate = an AE that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe = an AE that is incapacitating and prevents normal activities.
Time frame: From the first dose of IP up to 90 days after the last dose of IP or at follow-up visit; the mean total duration of IP exposure was 156.3 days, 171.1 days and 154.5 days respectively for 0.5 mg, 1 mg ozanimod and placebo.
Population: Safety population included all participants who were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of investigational product (IP) and who entered the maintenance period.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | Death | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Serious TEAE | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Severe TEAE | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal From Study | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Related Serious TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 TEAE | 8 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Severe TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Related Serious TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal From Study | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | Death | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Serious TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 TEAE | 4 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE | 1 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Withdrawal From Study | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related TEAE | 2 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 TEAE | 11 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Possibly, Probably or Related Serious TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Serious TEAE | 1 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Severe TEAE | 1 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | Death | 0 Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Maintenance Period | ≥ 1 Moderate or Severe TEAE | 5 Participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Mayo Score (MS) at Week 8
Clinical response was defined as a reduction from baseline in Mayo score ≥3 points and ≥30%, and a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. Clinical Respone was based on the 4-component Mayo definition.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment assignment designated according to randomized treatment. Participants with missing Mayo score were considered non-responders. Non responder imputation (NRI).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Mayo Score (MS) at Week 8 | 36.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Mayo Score (MS) at Week 8 | 53.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Mayo Score (MS) at Week 8 | 56.7 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission in the Mayo Score at Week 32
Clinical Remission was defined as: Mayo score of \<2 points and with no individual subscore of \> 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a score of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)
Time frame: Week 32
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment assignment designated according to randomized treatment. Participants with missing Mayo score were considered non-responders. Non responder imputation (NRI).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission in the Mayo Score at Week 32 | 6.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission in the Mayo Score at Week 32 | 26.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission in the Mayo Score at Week 32 | 20.9 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 32
Clinical response was defined as a reduction from baseline in Mayo score ≥3 points and ≥30%, and a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease. * Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) * Rectal bleeding Subscore (RBS) * Endoscopy Subscore * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)
Time frame: Week 32
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment assignment designated according to randomized treatment. Participants with missing Mayo score were considered non-responders. Non responder imputation (NRI).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 32 | 20.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 32 | 35.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 32 | 50.7 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 32
Mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy subscore ≤ 1 point. Endoscopy subscores were calculated based on central endoscopy reading. The endoscopy scale: 0 = Normal or inactive disease 1. = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability) 2. = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions) 3. = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration)
Time frame: Week 32
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment assignment designated according to randomized treatment. Non-responder imputation (NRI).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 32 | 12.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 32 | 32.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 32 | 32.8 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8
Mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy subscore ≤ 1 point. Endoscopy subscores were calculated based on central endoscopy reading. The endoscopy scale: 0 = Normal or inactive disease 1. = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability) 2. = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions) 3. = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration)
Time frame: Week 8
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, with treatment assignment designated according to randomized treatment. Non-responder imputation (NRI).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8 | 12.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 0.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8 | 27.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Ozanimod Hydrochloride 1 mg | Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8 | 34.3 Percentage of Participants |