Skip to content

Value of Pulse Pressure Variations and Corrected Flow Time in Esophageal Doppler as a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Prone Position During Spinal Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01646359
Enrollment
45
Registered
2012-07-20
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2012-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Elective Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion

Brief summary

In patients under mechanical ventilation, Usefulness of dynamic indices based on the heart-lung interactions for guiding volume resuscitation has been well validated. Recently, validity of pulse pressure variation (PPV) has been also reported to predict fluid responsiveness. Oesophageal Doppler (OED) allows continuous monitoring of several important hemodynamic variables. Of the OED variables, corrected flow time (FTc) has been evaluated and used as a preload index, and has been reported to predict fluid responsiveness. Prone position caused physiologic and hemodynamic changes and influenced the predictability and cut-off values of SVV and PPV for fluid responsiveness. In this prospective controlled study, the investigators evaluated the validity of PPV and FTc as predictors for fluid responsiveness in supine and prone position in patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion

Interventions

DEVICE1.Esophageal doppler monitor

1.Esophageal doppler monitor (CARDIO Q®, DELTEX MEDICAL. Brighton, U. K.)-inserted into the esophagus and positioned approximately 35-40 cm from the teeth. The position of OED prove was confirmed by continuously measuring blood flow velocity in the descending thoracic aorta and focused to find the optimum peak velocity and waveform signal.

DEVICE2. philips Intelivue MP70 monitors

2.philips Intelivue MP70 monitors (Intellivue MP70, philips medical Systems, Suresnes, France) -a radial arterial cannula was inserted and arterial pressure waveforms were monitored through Philips Intelivue MP70 monitors. In the monitor, PPVauto was displayed in real-time. It based on automatic detection algorithms, kernel smoothing, and rank-order filters.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients undergoing elective spine surgery * age : \> 20 and \< 70, 3. Patients expecting intraoperative blood loss more than 10% of estimated blood volume

Exclusion criteria

* arrhythmias * BMI \> 30 kg/m2 * valvular heart disease * left ventricular ejection fraction \< 50% * history of lung disease * pregnancy * foreigner * contraindications to esophageal doppler monitoring probe insertion (i.e. oesophageal stent, carcinoma of the oesophagus or pharynx, previous oesophageal surgery, oesophageal stricture, oesophageal varices, pharyngeal pouch, intra-aortic balloon pump, coarctation of the aorta, and severe coagulopathy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
PPV(Pulse pressure variation)15 minutes after induction of anaesthesia at the supine position
FTc(corrected flow time)15 minutes after induction of anaesthesia at the supine position

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026