Skip to content

An Open-label, Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of AUY922 vs Pemetrexed or Docetaxel in NSCLC Patients With EGFR Mutations

A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of AUY922 vs Pemetrexed or Docetaxel in NSCLC Patients With EGFR Mutations Who Have Progressed on Prior EGFR TKI Treatment

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01646125
Enrollment
59
Registered
2012-07-20
Start date
2012-11-23
Completion date
2015-11-04
Last updated
2019-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Keywords

Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), treatment of lung cancer after first metastasis, lung cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, Squamous cell lung carcinoma, Large-cell lung carcinoma, Non small cell lung carcinoma, Non small cell lung cancer, Non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC, Large cell lung carcinoma, Large cell lung cancer, HSP90, AUY922, Pemetrexed, Docetaxel, EGFR TKI, EGFR mutations

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to determine if AUY922 had superior efficacy when compared to chemotherapy agents docetaxel or pemetrexed in patients whose tumor had EGFR mutations. The primary purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of AUY922, when administered i.v. on a once-weekly schedule at 70 mg/m2, versus docetaxel or pemetrexed in adult patients with advanced NSCLC, whose tumors harbored EGFR activating mutations, and had developed resistance to EGFR TKI.

Interventions

DRUGAUY922

AUY922 was to be given by i.v. once weekly at 70 mg/m2 until disease progression, death or any other reason for discontinuation from study treatment.

DRUGDocetaxel

Docetaxel was to be given i.v. once every 3 weeks at 75 mg/m2 until progression or unacceptable toxicity

DRUGPemetrexed

Pemetrexed was to be given once every 3 weeks at 500 mg/m2 until progression or unacceptable toxicity

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with histologically or cytologically documented, locally advanced (stage IIIB who are not amenable to combined modality treatment) or recurrent or metastatic (Stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer. 2. Patients must have EGFR gene mutation in their tumors. This can be source - documented by one of the following: • Provide a pathology report that indicates the patient's tumor had EGFR activating mutation in the past. Or: • Perform testing (local or central) in an archival tumor or a fresh baseline biopsy tumor tissue to show the presence of EGFR activating mutation. 3. Patients must have documented clinical benefit (CR, PR, or patients with SD for 6 months or greater) on prior EGFR TKI (e.g. erlotinib or gefitinib) followed by documented progression according to RECIST. 4. Patients must have received prior platinum containing treatment. 5. WHO performance status of 0-1

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who have received more than two prior lines of antineoplastic therapy for advanced disease. Chemotherapy administered as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment more than six months prior to study enrollment is not considered a prior line of therapy for purposes of this study. 2. Evidence of spinal cord compression or current evidence of CNS metastases. Screening CT/MRI of the brain is mandatory. Note: Patients who have been treated for CNS metastases by radiation or gamma knife surgery, who been stable for at least 2 months and have discontinued high dose corticosteroids will be eligible for protocol participation 3. Prior treatment with an HSP90 inhibitor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS)16 monthsCompared PFS between the treatment of AUY922 to comparators Pemetrexed or Docetaxel. Progression-free survival (PFS) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1 was the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient had not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)from randomization until death up to deathOS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a death has not been observed by the date of analysis cutoff, then OS was to be censored at the last known date patient was alive.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 monthsDuration of DCR will be compared between treatment arms. The duration of DCR will be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1
Time to Response (TRR)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 monthsTTR was to compare between treatment arms. The TTR was to be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1
Overall Response Rate (ORR)16 monthsORR was to be compared between treatment arms. The ORR was to be based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Per this criteria for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.This outcome measure was originally planned to be analyzed up to 24 months. The DMC recommendation at the IA was to stop the study for futility. As a result, collection of all the efficacy assessments was stopped at that time.
Rate of Adverse Events (AEs)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 monthsTo evaluate safety and tolerability of AUY922 compared to chemotherapy agents pemetrexed or docetaxel.
Change in Laboratory Paramentersbaseline, until disease progression up to 24 monthsChanges in hematology and chemistry values, vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), Dose interruptions, reductions and dose intensity.
Time to Progression (TTP)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 monthsTTP will be compared between treatment arms. The TTP will be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1
Duration of Response (DOR)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 monthsThe DOR will be compared between treatment arms. The DOR will be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1

Countries

France, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive either AUY922 or pemetrexed/docetaxel. A total of 59 participants were randomized in the study: 31 to the AUY922 arm and 28 to the chemotherapy arm. 2 patients from the AUY922 arm & 5 from the chemotherapy arm were not treated. Only 52 received at least 1 dose of study medication.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AUY922 Arm
Participants were assigned to one of two treatment arms in a ratio of 1:1. This was the investigational drug arm. AUY922 was to be administered weekly.
31
Chemotherapy Arm
Participants were assigned to one of two treatment arms in a ratio of 1:1. This was the control arm drug arm. Pemetrexed or docetaxel was to be was to be given once every three weeks.
28
Total59

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event21
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyPhysician Decision13
Overall StudyProgressive disease2216
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor21
Overall StudySubject/Guardian decision11
Overall StudyUntreated25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAUY922 ArmChemotherapy ArmTotal
Age, Continuous61.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
62.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.34
61.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.13
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants21 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants7 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 2921 / 2349 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 296 / 2316 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Compared PFS between the treatment of AUY922 to comparators Pemetrexed or Docetaxel. Progression-free survival (PFS) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1 was the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient had not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions

Time frame: 16 months

Population: Efficacy analysis set (EAS) compromised of a subset of patients in the FAS who received 2 lines of prior antineoplastic therapy consisting of a platinum-based treatment \& an EGFR TKI treatment. The DMC recommendation at Interim analysis was to stop the study for futility. As a result, collection of all efficacy assessments was stopped.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AUY922 ArmProgression Free Survival (PFS)1.5 Months
Chemotherapy ArmProgression Free Survival (PFS)2.3 Months
90% CI: [0.35, 1.63]
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Paramenters

Changes in hematology and chemistry values, vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), Dose interruptions, reductions and dose intensity.

Time frame: baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months

Population: The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.

Secondary

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

Duration of DCR will be compared between treatment arms. The duration of DCR will be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1

Time frame: baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months

Population: The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.

Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

The DOR will be compared between treatment arms. The DOR will be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1

Time frame: baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months

Population: The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.

Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was to be compared between treatment arms. The ORR was to be based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Per this criteria for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.This outcome measure was originally planned to be analyzed up to 24 months. The DMC recommendation at the IA was to stop the study for futility. As a result, collection of all the efficacy assessments was stopped at that time.

Time frame: 16 months

Population: The data monitoring committee's (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AUY922 ArmOverall Response Rate (ORR)Complete Response (CR)0 Participants
AUY922 ArmOverall Response Rate (ORR)Partial Response (PR)3 Participants
AUY922 ArmOverall Response Rate (ORR)ORR (CR + PR)3 Participants
Chemotherapy ArmOverall Response Rate (ORR)Complete Response (CR)0 Participants
Chemotherapy ArmOverall Response Rate (ORR)Partial Response (PR)2 Participants
Chemotherapy ArmOverall Response Rate (ORR)ORR (CR + PR)2 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a death has not been observed by the date of analysis cutoff, then OS was to be censored at the last known date patient was alive.

Time frame: from randomization until death up to death

Population: The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.

Secondary

Rate of Adverse Events (AEs)

To evaluate safety and tolerability of AUY922 compared to chemotherapy agents pemetrexed or docetaxel.

Time frame: baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months

Population: The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.

Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP will be compared between treatment arms. The TTP will be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1

Time frame: baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months

Population: The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.

Secondary

Time to Response (TRR)

TTR was to compare between treatment arms. The TTR was to be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1

Time frame: baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months

Population: The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026