Early Onset of Delivery Before 37 Weeks
Conditions
Brief summary
The preterm birth is considered as a main problem in the modern obstetrics, being the responsible of greatest of 50% neonatal morbimortality and heavy costs. Despite the significant medical advances, the rate of prematurity has not declined over the past 40 years and even continues to rise in the developed countries. In order to decrease the prematurity is necessary that two premises: to identify the pregnant women at risk of preterm birth, and dispose of useful measures aimed at prolonging the pregnancy and therefore avoid preterm delivery. The investigators propose a clinical trial with the objective to identify effective strategies to reduce the premature birth (34 weeks and earlier) rate in the population of pregnant women at risk for premature birth, which will be identified by ultrasound during the second trimester of their pregnancy. The investigators intend to compare two accepted strategies: administration of progesterone (vaginally) or the placement of vaginal pessaries. These 2 strategies are affordable, easy to apply, and they present very few maternal-fetal secondary effects.
Detailed description
The preterm birth is considered as a main problem in the modern obstetrics, being the responsible of greatest of 50% neonatal morbimortality and heavy costs. Despite the significant medical advances, the rate of prematurity has not declined over the past 40 years and even continues to rise in the developed countries. In order to decrease the prematurity is necessary that two premises: to identify the pregnant women at risk of preterm birth, and dispose of useful measures aimed at prolonging the pregnancy and therefore avoid preterm delivery. Since 1990, many published articles describe the sonographic measurement of the cervix from the week 16 as method of population screening to detect women at risk. Several studies provide evidence about an inverse relationship between the cervical length and the risk of preterm delivery. For this reason, if there is an effective intervention for patients with cervix short (about \< 25mm), made this measure in the middle of the second term, the investigators could reduce the prematurity. Regarding possible therapeutic strategies, recent published data demonstrate the effective of vaginal progesterone and cervical pessary in this population. However, both treatments have never been compared and none of the two strategies are indicated in this population. Therefore it results necessary to compare both treatments in order to establish clinical recommendations. The investigators propose a clinical trial to compare two accepted strategies: administration of progesterone (vaginally) or the placement of vaginal pessaries in order to reduce the premature birth (34 weeks and earlier) rate in the population of pregnant women at risk for premature birth, which will be identified by ultrasound during the second trimester of their pregnancy.
Interventions
200 mg vaginal route per day
DEVICECervical pessary
Cervical pessary certified by European Conformity (CE0482, MED/CERT ISO 9003/EN 46003;Dr Arabin, lower larger diameter 70 mm, height 30 mm,and upper smaller diameter 32 mm)
Sponsors
Dra.Cristina Martinez Payo
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Pregnant women with short cervix (=\< 25 mm) identified by use of routine transvaginal ultrasonography at 19-22 weeks of gestation. * Single pregnancy * Women older than 18 year-old * Women sign informed consent according GCP and local legislation * Gestational age at randomization between 20+1 and 23+6 weeks.
Exclusion criteria
* Major fetal abnormalities * Major uterine abnormalities * Placenta praevia during current pregnancy * Vaginal bleeding or ruptured membranes in the moment of randomization * Cervical cerclage in situ * History of cone biopsy * Allergic to peanuts * Contraindication for Progesterone usage. * Active treatment with Progesterone at randomization. * History of 3 or more premature labor. * If in the investigator's opinion, there are findings on physical examination, abnormalities in the results of clinical analyzes or other medical factors, social or psycho-social that could negatively influence. * Women unable to give the informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Proportion of spontaneous preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation | up to 11 weeks (from date of randomization until delivery) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Proportion of Spontaneous preterm birth before 28 weeks of gestation | up to 8 weeks (from date of randomization until delivery) |
| Rate of premature rupture of membranes before 34 weeks of gestation | up to 11 weeks (from date of randomization until delivery) |
| Weight at birth | up to 21 weeks (from date of randomization until delivery) |
| Rate of fetal and neonatal mortality | From date of randomization until the date of delivery, assessed up 21 weeks |
| Proportion of spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation | up to 17 weeks (from date of randomization until delivery) |
| Proportion of participants with adverse events | From date of randomization until the date of delivery, assessed up 21 weeks |
| Rate of Chorioamnionitis during third term | From date of randomization until the date of delivery, assessed up 21 weeks |
| Need of admission because of premature labor before 34 weeks of gestation | up to 14 weeks (from date of randomization until delivery) |
| Rate of neonatal morbidity | From date of randomization until the date of delivery, assessed up 21 weeks |
| Symptomatic vaginal infections during treatment period | From date of randomization until the date of delivery, assessed up 21 weeks |
Countries
Spain
Outcome results
None listed