Skip to content

The Effect of Palatal Brushing on Denture Stomatitis

Phase-I Clinical Trial on the Effect of Palatal Brushing on Denture Stomatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01643876
Enrollment
48
Registered
2012-07-18
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2014-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Denture Stomatitis

Keywords

Denture stomatitis, Denture Plaque, Oral Candidiasis, Oral Hygiene

Brief summary

Palatal brushing has several advantages including removal of debris and stimulation of blood flow and saliva, which may help to prevent or treat oral diseases, such as denture-related stomatitis in complete denture wearers. However, there is no previous clinical trial testing this effect. Therefore, the investigators goal is to evaluate whether palatal brushing may change the severity of denture stomatitis and counts of microbes on denture and palatal mucosa. After an initial exam and data collection, participants will receive instructions about palatal brushing and they will be assessed after 1 and 3 months. Collection of data will include patient-reported information, intraoral photographs and swabbing (for counting microbes). Tested Hypotheses: * There is no difference in the extent of palatal inflammation in edentulous patients with denture stomatitis before and after 3 months of palatal brushing. * There is no difference in the number of colony forming unit (CFU) of Candida isolated from palate and denture of patients affected by denture stomatitis before and after 3 months of palatal brushing.

Interventions

Participants will be instructed to brush their palate with a manual soft-bristle brush after each meal and before sleeping for a period of 3 months. They will be asked to keep to their usual oral and denture hygiene routine during the trial to allow the isolation of the effect of palatal brushing.

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
CollaboratorOTHER
Université de Montréal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Good general health. * Completely edentulous maxilla. * Currently wearing complete upper dentures. * A clinical diagnosis of denture stomatitis.

Exclusion criteria

* Conditions known to promote Candida carriage such as diabetes, anemia, xerostomia, immunosuppression, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. * Use of antibiotics, antifungal agents or corticosteroids at least 4 weeks before the study. * Previous palatal brushing habit. * Changing of the existing prosthesis during the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Palatal Inflammation3 monthsModified Newton classification 0: Healthy mucosa 1: Type IA, Petechiae in a normal palatal tissue, which are usually found around the orifices of the ducts of the palatal mucous glands 2: Type IB, Localized area of inflammation of the denture-bearing area 3: Type II, Generalised area of inflammation of the denture-bearing area 4: Type III, Hyperplasic palatal surface with inflammation of the denture-bearing area Inflammation area index 0: No inflammation 1. Inflammation of the palate extending up to 25 % of the palatal denture-bearing tissue 2. Inflammation of the palate extending between 25 % and 50 % of the palatal denture-bearing tissue 3. Inflammation covering more than 50 % of the palatal denture-bearing tissue Inflammation severity index 0: Normal tissue 1. Mild inflammation 2. Moderate inflammation 3. Severe inflammation Total score for inflammation = area + intensity (range 0 to 6)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Candida Species Count3 monthsCandida colony forming units (CFU), defined as the number of colonies formed on a 75 mm agar plate inoculated with collected samples obtained from A)plaque formed on denture surface and B)palatal mucosa.

Countries

Brazil, Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment from the prosthodontic clinics of the Université de Montréal and of Ribeirão Preto Dental School. Recruitment period dates: May 2012-February 2013.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Palatal Brushing
Palatal brushing after each meal for 3 months. Palatal brushing : Participants will be instructed to brush their palate with a manual soft-bristle brush after each meal and before sleeping for a period of 3 months. They will be asked to keep to their usual oral and denture hygiene routine during the trial to allow the isolation of the effect of palatal brushing.
48
Total48

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPalatal Brushing
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
25 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants
Age, Continuous66.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
26 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
22 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Palatal Inflammation

Modified Newton classification 0: Healthy mucosa 1: Type IA, Petechiae in a normal palatal tissue, which are usually found around the orifices of the ducts of the palatal mucous glands 2: Type IB, Localized area of inflammation of the denture-bearing area 3: Type II, Generalised area of inflammation of the denture-bearing area 4: Type III, Hyperplasic palatal surface with inflammation of the denture-bearing area Inflammation area index 0: No inflammation 1. Inflammation of the palate extending up to 25 % of the palatal denture-bearing tissue 2. Inflammation of the palate extending between 25 % and 50 % of the palatal denture-bearing tissue 3. Inflammation covering more than 50 % of the palatal denture-bearing tissue Inflammation severity index 0: Normal tissue 1. Mild inflammation 2. Moderate inflammation 3. Severe inflammation Total score for inflammation = area + intensity (range 0 to 6)

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Palatal BrushingPalatal InflammationModified Newton classification, pre-intervention3 units on a scale
Palatal BrushingPalatal InflammationModified Newton classification, post-intervention3 units on a scale
Palatal BrushingPalatal InflammationInflammation area index, pre-intervention2.5 units on a scale
Palatal BrushingPalatal InflammationInflammation area index, post-intervention2 units on a scale
Palatal BrushingPalatal InflammationInflammation severity index, pre-intervention2 units on a scale
Palatal BrushingPalatal InflammationInflammation severity index, post-intervention1 units on a scale
Palatal BrushingPalatal InflammationTotal score for inflammation, pre-intervention5 units on a scale
Palatal BrushingPalatal InflammationTotal score for inflammation, post-intervention3 units on a scale
Comparison: Null hypothesis: in individuals with denture stomatitis, there are no difference in the extent of palatal inflammation before and 3 months after palatal brushing. Assuming that the minimal practically important pre/post difference in the mean change score is 20 percent and the standard deviation of the distribution of the change in score is 0.8, a sample size of 44 participants is required to ensure a power of 90 % of rejecting the null hypothesis if it is indeed false.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Candida Species Count

Candida colony forming units (CFU), defined as the number of colonies formed on a 75 mm agar plate inoculated with collected samples obtained from A)plaque formed on denture surface and B)palatal mucosa.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Palatal BrushingCandida Species CountColonies from denture surface, pre-intervention1110 colony forming units (CFUs)
Palatal BrushingCandida Species CountColonies from denture surface, post-intervention860 colony forming units (CFUs)
Palatal BrushingCandida Species CountColonies from palatal mucosa, pre-intervention0 colony forming units (CFUs)
Palatal BrushingCandida Species CountColonies from palatal mucosa, post-intervention0 colony forming units (CFUs)
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: in individuals with denture stomatitis, there are no difference in the number of Candida Colony-Forming Units (CFUs), before and 3 months after palatal brushing.p-value: <0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026