Skip to content

Ultrasound Guided Distal Sciatic Nerve Block - a Comparison With Nerve Stimulator Technique

Ultrasound Guided Distal Sciatic Nerve Block - a Randomised Comparison With Nerve Stimulator Technique

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01643616
Enrollment
250
Registered
2012-07-18
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2013-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Other Surgical Procedures

Keywords

Sciatic Nerve, Ultrasound, Anesthesia, Regional, Orthopedic Surgery

Brief summary

For distal sciatic nerve block this prospective, randomised comparison with ultrasound guided distal subepineural block tested the hypothesis, that intraepineural injection of local anesthetic using nerve stimulation technique is common and associated with high success rate.

Detailed description

Classical methods for nerve localization (loss of resistance, cause of paresthesias, nerve stimulation technique)assumed that the target is a close approximation to the nerve, without epineural perforation. Intraneural injections were considered as evitable, with high risk for nerve damages. Ultrasound guidance provided for the first time a real-time visualization of the spread of local anesthetic. Some recent studies proved, that an intraneural injection using nerve stimulator technique is common and not necessarily accompanied with nerve damages. In the ultrasound group (group US) the investigators tested the hypothesis, that an intraneural injection of local anesthetic generate a high success rate and a short onset time without clinical apparent nerve damages. In the nerve-stimulation group (group NS) the investigators tested the hypothesis, that an intraneural injection of local anesthetic is common, and in case of intraneural injection accompanied likewise with high success rate and shorter onset time. For the sciatic division the investigators tested the hypothesis, that classical methods of nerve localization (nerve-stimulation technique, cause of paresthesias) are not able to avoid epineural perforation.

Interventions

DRUGmidazolam

Prior to performing the regional anesthesia the investigators administered midazolam as a premedication by mouth (3,75-7,5mg) or intravenously (2-3mg).

20ml Prilocaine 1% for distal sciatic nerve block (30ml Prilocaine 1% in outpatients)

10ml Ropivacaine 0.75% for distal sciatic nerve block (not in outpatients)

In group US the sciatic nerve localization and needle guidance is realized using ultrasound.

DEVICEnerve stimulation technique

In the group NS sciatic nerve localization and needle guidance is realized using nerve stimulation technique. However, ultrasound is used observing (Observer) the procedure, but blinded for the physician (Anesthetist) performing the block.

Sponsors

Helios Research Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* elective surgery on the foot or ankle * tourniquet distal of the knee * adult patients, 18-75 years old * ASA-risk-groups I-III (American Society of Anesthesiologists) * informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* severe coagulopathy * systemic inflammatory response * ASA-risk-groups \> III (American Society of Anesthesiologists) * drug allergy: local anesthetics * pregnancy, lactation period * participation in other studies * addiction to drugs or alcohol * non-cooperative patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success Rate Without Supplementationwithin 30-60 minutes after injection of the local anestheticAfter injection of local anesthetic a waiting period of 30-60 minutes was defined before completing a failed block. 1. success without supplementation = no additional analgetics or rescue blocks required (success rate without supplementation, outcome measure 1) 2. success with supplementation = analgetics or selective rescue blocks distal of the sciatic division required (success rate without supplementation and additionally all supplemented blocks, outcome measure 3) 3. failed block = change of anesthetic procedure (general, spinal) or rescue blocks proximal of the sciatic division
Time Until Readiness for Surgery (Minutes)within 60 minutes after injection of the local anesthetic
Success Rate With Supplementationlater than 30-60 minutes after injection of the local anestheticAfter injection of local anesthetic a waiting period of 30-60 minutes was defined before completing a failed block. 1. success without supplementation = no additional analgetics or rescue blocks required (success rate without supplementation, outcome measure 1) 2. success with supplementation = analgetics or selective rescue blocks distal of the sciatic division required (success rate without supplementation and additionally all supplemented blocks, outcome measure 3) 3. failed block = change of anesthetic procedure (general, spinal) or rescue blocks proximal of the sciatic divisionSucces rate with supplementation

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Adult patients were informed and included in the study in the anesthesiology outpatient clinic as part of normal pre-operative preparation. Using a computer-generated list of random numbers, patients were randomly allocated to either the nerve stimulation group (NS group, n=125) or the ultrasound group (US group, n=125).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group US
Ultrasound guided block : 20ml Prilocaine 1% and 10ml Ropivacaine 0.75% (30ml Prilocaine 1% in outpatients)
125
Group NS
Nerve stimulation technique: 20ml Prilocaine 1% and 10ml Ropivacaine 0.75% (30ml Prilocaine 1% in outpatients)
125
Total250

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup NSGroup USTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
30 Participants26 Participants56 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
95 Participants99 Participants194 Participants
Age Continuous56.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
Region of Enrollment
Germany
125 participants125 participants250 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
91 Participants107 Participants198 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants18 Participants52 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
66 / 12524 / 125
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1251 / 125

Outcome results

Primary

Success Rate Without Supplementation

After injection of local anesthetic a waiting period of 30-60 minutes was defined before completing a failed block. 1. success without supplementation = no additional analgetics or rescue blocks required (success rate without supplementation, outcome measure 1) 2. success with supplementation = analgetics or selective rescue blocks distal of the sciatic division required (success rate without supplementation and additionally all supplemented blocks, outcome measure 3) 3. failed block = change of anesthetic procedure (general, spinal) or rescue blocks proximal of the sciatic division

Time frame: within 30-60 minutes after injection of the local anesthetic

Population: In the NS group two investigators were necessary in order to realize the blinded study protocol. For personnel reasons this was not possible in every case and led to deviations from the randomization protocol for seven patients in each group. These patients were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group USSuccess Rate Without Supplementation112 participants
Group NSSuccess Rate Without Supplementation73 participants
Comparison: For sample size calculation we assumed a significance level of 0.05 and a success rate derived from clinical data of 75% in the nerve stimulation group and of 90% in the ultrasound group. With a group ratio of 1:1 and a power of 0.8, the required sample size was at least 226. For statistical analysis we used the exact Fisher test as a distribution-free, non-parametric test method.p-value: <0.05Fisher Exact
Primary

Success Rate With Supplementation

After injection of local anesthetic a waiting period of 30-60 minutes was defined before completing a failed block. 1. success without supplementation = no additional analgetics or rescue blocks required (success rate without supplementation, outcome measure 1) 2. success with supplementation = analgetics or selective rescue blocks distal of the sciatic division required (success rate without supplementation and additionally all supplemented blocks, outcome measure 3) 3. failed block = change of anesthetic procedure (general, spinal) or rescue blocks proximal of the sciatic divisionSucces rate with supplementation

Time frame: later than 30-60 minutes after injection of the local anesthetic

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group USSuccess Rate With Supplementation116 participants
Group NSSuccess Rate With Supplementation85 participants
Comparison: For sample size calculation we assumed a significance level of 0.05 and a success rate derived from clinical data of 75% in the nerve stimulation group and of 90% in the ultrasound group. With a group ratio of 1:1 and a power of 0.8, the required sample size was at least 226. For statistical analysis we used the exact Fisher test as a distribution-free, non-parametric test method.p-value: 0.05Fisher Exact
Primary

Time Until Readiness for Surgery (Minutes)

Time frame: within 60 minutes after injection of the local anesthetic

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group USTime Until Readiness for Surgery (Minutes)15.1 minutes
Group NSTime Until Readiness for Surgery (Minutes)28 minutes
Comparison: We used the log-rank test to compare the onset times. The significance level was defined with p\<0.05.p-value: <0.0595% CI: [13.6, 31.1]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026