Skip to content

Randomized Study of Failed SCS Trials Comparing Outcomes Using the Observational Mechanical Gateway (OMG) Connector

Randomized Study of Failed SCS Trials Comparing Outcomes Using the Observational Mechanical Gateway (OMG) Connector

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01643213
Acronym
RESCUE
Enrollment
27
Registered
2012-07-18
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2020-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient preference of the Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC) commercially approved spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems with the Observational Mechanical Gateway (OMG) in patients who failed non-BSC SCS trial therapy.

Detailed description

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for the treatment of chronic pain of the trunk and/or limbs. Standard practice includes a screening trial, typically lasting from 3 days to 7 days or more, for both the physician and the patient to evaluate whether SCS therapy is appropriate for permanent implantation. Screening trial success (hereafter referred to as a trial) is often considered predictive of long-term success of the therapy, although that has never been definitively demonstrated. Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC) developed the Observational Mechanical Gateway (OMG) connectors to allow patients who previously underwent an SCS trial using Medtronic or St Jude Medical leads, operating room cables (OR-cables), and external trial stimulators (ETSs), to be able to connect to BSC commercially approved Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) trial systems to evaluate the BSC SCS therapy in the physician office setting prior to removal of the non-BSC leads.

Interventions

DEVICENon Boston Scientific SCS Trial Therapy

No procedures will be attempted as part of this study. This intervention refers to connection and activation of a previously implanted and programmed FDA-approved non Boston Scientific SCS trial system for 30 minutes of SCS therapy for pain

DEVICEBSC approved SCS Trial Therapy w/ OMG

No procedures will be attempted as part of this study. This intervention refers to connection and activation of all Boston Scientific commercially approved SCS trial systems for 30 minutes of SCS therapy for pain

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or lower extremities * History of trunk and/or lower extremity pain lasting at least 6 months * Study candidate completed a spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trial of a FDA-approved non-Boston Scientific Corporation (non-BSC) system, exclusively for the treatment of chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or lower extremities, that will not proceed to permanent implantation due to unsatisfactory treatment or in the physician's opinion received sub-optimal results * Currently implanted with FDA-approved non-BSC SCS lead(s) exclusively in the thoracolumbar epidural space that are temporarily anchored for non-surgical removal at the termination of the screening trial period and which are approved for use with either the Observational Mechanical Gateway (OMG) A or OMG-M, per the OMG directions for use Key

Exclusion criteria

* Primary source of pain is cancer-related, pelvic, visceral or angina * Investigator-suspected gross lead migration during the non-BSC trial period which may preclude the study candidate from receiving adequate SCS therapy * Study candidate reports \<10% paresthesia coverage of overall pain while running the preferred stimulation settings on the non-BSC SCS system at the end of the non-BSC SCS screening trial period * Study candidate unwilling to tolerate implantation with an SCS system

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject's Treatment Preference30 minutes after activation of stimulationSubject were asked if he/she prefers their current period SCS therapy over the SCS therapy he/she received during the SCS trial period prior to Baseline

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment to Control
Treatment (BSC SCS Therapy) followed by Control (non-BSC SCS Therapy)
13
Control to Treatment
Control (non-BSC SCS Therapy) followed by Treatment (BSC SCS Therapy)
14
Total27

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment to ControlControl to TreatmentTotal
Age, Continuous57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.71
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.02
56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.68
Region of Enrollment: United States13 participants14 participants27 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants11 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Subject's Treatment Preference

Subject were asked if he/she prefers their current period SCS therapy over the SCS therapy he/she received during the SCS trial period prior to Baseline

Time frame: 30 minutes after activation of stimulation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment to ControlSubject's Treatment PreferencePeriod 1 No, Period 2 Yes1 participants
Treatment to ControlSubject's Treatment PreferencePeriod 1 Yes, Period 2 Yes6 participants
Treatment to ControlSubject's Treatment PreferencePeriod 1 No, Period 2 No4 participants
Treatment to ControlSubject's Treatment PreferencePeriod 1 Yes, Period 2 No1 participants
Control to TreatmentSubject's Treatment PreferencePeriod 1 No, Period 2 No4 participants
Control to TreatmentSubject's Treatment PreferencePeriod 1 Yes, Period 2 Yes3 participants
Control to TreatmentSubject's Treatment PreferencePeriod 1 No, Period 2 Yes4 participants
Control to TreatmentSubject's Treatment PreferencePeriod 1 Yes, Period 2 No2 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026