Skip to content

Non-expensive and Widely Available Tests as Diagnostic Tools in Dementia and Their Ability to Predict Disease Progression

Quantitative Electroencephalography, Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers, Linear CT Analyses and Timed Up and GO Dual Task as Diagnostic Tools in Dementia and Their Ability to Predict Disease Progression.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01642420
Acronym
DEMPROG
Enrollment
115
Registered
2012-07-17
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2017-02-28
Last updated
2012-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimers Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Brief summary

Alzheimers disease (AD) is the most common course of cognitive decline and thereby the course of more than half of all cases of dementia. A proper AD diagnosis is rested on a number of examinations and tests, which combined can make AD diagnosis likely. But no single test or examination can unambiguous determine whether the patient has AD or not. Comparatively no examination or test can with accuracy predict whether a healthy person or a person with only mild cognitive (MCI)impairment in time will evolve AD. Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, linear CT analyses and Timed Up and Go - Dual Task (TUG-DT) are relatively inexpensive and and widely available diagnostic methods, which have the potential to diagnose AD at an early stage in a reliable accurate way. But they also have the potential to predict which patients diagnosed with MCI have particular risk of developing dementia. The purpose of the study is to investigate the relations between qEEG, CSF biomarkers, CT analyses and TUG-DT outcome and clinical features in healthy persons as well as patients with MCI and AD Furthermore to investigate whether qEEG or CSF biomarkers can predict which patients with MCI will in time evolve AD.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Zealand University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

For patients: * age 50 to 90 * diagnosed with MCI or AD * cerebrospinal fluid examination and EEG performed at baseline For control persons: * age 50 to 90 * MMSE score equal or above 26 * ACE score equal or above 85 * Normal physical examination, including normal blood samples, CT of cerebrum and EEG examination

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breastfeeding * psychiatric disease, former depression is allowed if antidepressive treatment has been initiated of a leat 3 months duration * Neurologic or somatic disease, including former severe head trauma or neuroinfection * Antipsychotic treatment * Former severe abuse of alcohol, medication or drugs * ECT treatment or anaesthesia within the last 3 months * no closely related person to assist the patient Additionally

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimers diseaseEvery year in totally of 3 yearsThe primary outcome measure is progression of clinical symptoms to an extent where the formal NINCDS-ADRDA criteria for dementia is meet. The progression is based upon clinical symptoms as well as explorative determinants in form of clinical tests, CSF analysis and qEEG analysis.

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactMalene s Nielsen, MD
malni@regionsjaelland.dk0045 2868 0034
Backup ContactPeter Høgh, MD, Ph.D
phh@regionsjaelland.dk0045 4732 2809

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026