Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
This observational, prospective, multicenter study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of MabThera/Rituxan in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response or intolerance to one anti-TNF therapy. Participants who receive MabThera/Rituxan according to the current standard and in line with the summary of product characteristics at a dose of 1000 milligram (mg) intravenously on Days 1 and 15 will be followed for 20 weeks.
Interventions
Rituximab at a dose determined by the investigator, guided by the recommendation in the Summary of Product Characteristics.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult participants, \>/= 18 years of age * Participants with rheumatoid arthritis, eligible for treatment with MabThera/Rituxan in accordance with summary of product characteristics (SPC) * Inadequate response to a single TNF inhibitor defined as change in disease activity score-28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) \<1.2 or DAS28-ESR \>3.5 at 5 months after first course of anti-TNF therapy * Participants with a clinical and biological evaluation performed within 12 weeks prior to enrollment may be included
Exclusion criteria
* More than one previous anti-TNF therapies * Any other biological therapy apart from the one anti-TNF therapy * Hypersensitivity to rituximab or any of the excipients or to murine proteins * Active severe infections * Participants in a severely immunocompromised state * Severe heart failure \[New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV\] or severe, uncontrolled cardiac disease * Women of childbearing potential not willing to use contraception * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Participation in another trial
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | Up to 39 months | An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. |
| Percentage of Participant With Good or Moderate Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria | Week 20 | The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to 10. DAS28 \<=3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 indicates moderate to high disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline (CFB) and the level of disease activity reached. Good response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and a CFB \>1.2. Moderate response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \>1.2 or \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>1.2. No response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>=0.6, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \<=0.6, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2 or \<=0.6. |
| Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 20 | Baseline and Week 20 | DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using an assessment of 28 joints, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (milliliter per hour \[ml/hr\]), and Patient's Global Assessment (PGH) of disease activity \[measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity\]. DAS28 was calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*PGH of disease activity. Total score range: 0-10, with a higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission. |
| Mean DAS28-ESR Score at Visit 4 (Week 20) | Week 20 | DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using an assessment of 28 joints, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (milliliter per hour \[ml/hr\]), and Patient's Global Assessment (PGH) of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*PGH of disease activity. Total score range: 0-10, with a higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission. |
| Percentage of Participants With Change in DAS28-ESR of Greater Than or Equal (>=) 1.2 After First Course of Treatment | Week 20 | DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using an assessment of 28 joints, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (milliliter per hour \[ml/hr\]), and Patient's Global Assessment (PGH) of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*PGH of disease activity. Total score range: 0-10, with a higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission. |
| Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response | Week 20 | The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to 10. DAS28 \<=3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 indicates moderate to high disease activity. A negative CFB indicates improvement. The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of CFB and the level of disease activity reached. Good response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and a CFB \>1.2. Moderate response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \>1.2 or \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>1.2. No response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>=0.6, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \<=0.6, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2 or \<=0.6. |
| Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | Week 20 | The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to 10. DAS28 \<=3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 indicates moderate to high disease activity. A negative CFB indicates improvement. The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of CFB and the level of disease activity reached. Good response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and a CFB \>1.2. Moderate response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \>1.2 or \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>1.2. No response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>=0.6, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \<=0.6, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2 or \<=0.6. |
| Percentage of Participants With Remission (DAS28 <2.6) and Low Disease Activity Following Each Treatment Course | Week 20 | DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using an assessment of 28 joints, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (milliliter per hour \[ml/hr\]), and Patient's Global Assessment (PGH) of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*PGH of disease activity. Total score range: 0-10, with a higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission. |
| Number of Participants With Remission (DAS28 <2.6) and Low Disease Activity Following Each Treatment Course for Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Etanercept or Adalimumab or Infliximab Before Rituximab | Week 20 | The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to 10. DAS28 \<=3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 indicates moderate to high disease activity. A negative change from Baseline (CFB) indicates improvement. The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of CFB and the level of disease activity reached. Good response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and a CFB \>1.2. Moderate response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \>1.2 or \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>1.2. No response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>=0.6, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \<=0.6, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2 or \<=0.6. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Week 20 | Baseline and Week 20 | HAQ is a self-completed patient questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. Calculate HAQ the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. |
Countries
Romania
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 505 participants were recruited in 58 centers.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Rituximab Participants who had an inadequate response or intolerance to one anti- tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent received rituximab (Mabthera) at a dose determined by the investigator, guided by the recommendation in the Summary of Product Characteristics. | 505 |
| Total | 505 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 6 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 28 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Rituximab |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 56.36 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.681 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 434 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 71 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 3 / 504 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 14 / 504 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 20
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using an assessment of 28 joints, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (milliliter per hour \[ml/hr\]), and Patient's Global Assessment (PGH) of disease activity \[measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity\]. DAS28 was calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*PGH of disease activity. Total score range: 0-10, with a higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 20
Population: Full analysis population included all participants who has fulfilled the eligibility criteria, and signed the informed consent form, participated at the screening examination. Here, number of participants analyzed is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 20 | -1.53458 units on a scale |
Mean DAS28-ESR Score at Visit 4 (Week 20)
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using an assessment of 28 joints, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (milliliter per hour \[ml/hr\]), and Patient's Global Assessment (PGH) of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*PGH of disease activity. Total score range: 0-10, with a higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission.
Time frame: Week 20
Population: Full analysis population included all participants who has fulfilled the eligibility criteria, and signed the informed consent form, participated at the screening examination. Here, number of participants analyzed is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Mean DAS28-ESR Score at Visit 4 (Week 20) | 3.8218 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.26061 |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Time frame: Up to 39 months
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) | 16 participants |
Number of Participants With Remission (DAS28 <2.6) and Low Disease Activity Following Each Treatment Course for Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Etanercept or Adalimumab or Infliximab Before Rituximab
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to 10. DAS28 \<=3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 indicates moderate to high disease activity. A negative change from Baseline (CFB) indicates improvement. The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of CFB and the level of disease activity reached. Good response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and a CFB \>1.2. Moderate response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \>1.2 or \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>1.2. No response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>=0.6, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \<=0.6, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2 or \<=0.6.
Time frame: Week 20
Population: Full analysis population included all participants who has fulfilled the eligibility criteria, and signed the informed consent form, participated at the screening examination. Here, number of participants analyzed is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Number of Participants With Remission (DAS28 <2.6) and Low Disease Activity Following Each Treatment Course for Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Etanercept or Adalimumab or Infliximab Before Rituximab | Adalimumab | 18 participants |
| Rituximab | Number of Participants With Remission (DAS28 <2.6) and Low Disease Activity Following Each Treatment Course for Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Etanercept or Adalimumab or Infliximab Before Rituximab | Etanercept | 18 participants |
| Rituximab | Number of Participants With Remission (DAS28 <2.6) and Low Disease Activity Following Each Treatment Course for Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Etanercept or Adalimumab or Infliximab Before Rituximab | Infliximab | 24 participants |
Percentage of Participants With Change in DAS28-ESR of Greater Than or Equal (>=) 1.2 After First Course of Treatment
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using an assessment of 28 joints, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (milliliter per hour \[ml/hr\]), and Patient's Global Assessment (PGH) of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*PGH of disease activity. Total score range: 0-10, with a higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission.
Time frame: Week 20
Population: Full analysis population included all participants who has fulfilled the eligibility criteria, and signed the informed consent form, participated at the screening examination. Here, number of participants analyzed is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With Change in DAS28-ESR of Greater Than or Equal (>=) 1.2 After First Course of Treatment | 57.99 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to 10. DAS28 \<=3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 indicates moderate to high disease activity. A negative CFB indicates improvement. The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of CFB and the level of disease activity reached. Good response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and a CFB \>1.2. Moderate response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \>1.2 or \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>1.2. No response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>=0.6, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \<=0.6, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2 or \<=0.6.
Time frame: Week 20
Population: Full analysis population included all participants who has fulfilled the eligibility criteria, and signed the informed consent form, participated at the screening examination. Here, number of participants analyzed is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response | Present <=3.2; CFB>1.2 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response | No improvement | 8 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response | Present <=3.2; CFB>0.6 to <=1.2 | 8.20 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response | Present <=3.2; CFB <=0.6 | 17.62 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response | Present >3.2 to <=5.1; CFB >1.2 | 43.03 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response | Present >3.2 to <=5.1; CFB >0.6 and <=1.2 | 9.00 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response | Present >3.2 to <=5.1; CFB <=0.6 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response | Present >5.1; CFB >1.2 | 14.54 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response | Present >5.1; CFB >0.6 to <=1.2 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response | Present >5.1; CFB <=0.6 | 0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to 10. DAS28 \<=3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 indicates moderate to high disease activity. A negative CFB indicates improvement. The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of CFB and the level of disease activity reached. Good response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and a CFB \>1.2. Moderate response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \>1.2 or \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>1.2. No response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>=0.6, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \<=0.6, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2 or \<=0.6.
Time frame: Week 20
Population: Full analysis population included all participants who has fulfilled the eligibility criteria, and signed the informed consent form, participated at the screening examination. Here, number of participants analyzed is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | No treatment; DAS 28 >3.2 to <=5.1 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | No treatment; DAS 28 >5.1 | 0.83 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | Actemra; DAS 28 >3.2 to <=5.1 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | Actemra; DAS 28 >5.1 | 4.16 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | Certolizumab; DAS 28 >3.2 to <=5.1 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | Certolizumab; DAS 28 >5.1 | 0.83 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | Golimumab; DAS 28 >3.2 to <=5.1 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | Golimumab; DAS 28 >5.1 | 10 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | Rituximab; DAS 28 >3.2 to <=5.1 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | Rituximab; DAS 28 >5.1 | 3.33 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | Tocilizumab; DAS 28 >3.2 to <=5.1 | 40.83 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response in Subgroup of Participants Who Had Been Treated With Anti-TNF Previously | Tocilizumab; DAS 28 >5.1 | 40 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Remission (DAS28 <2.6) and Low Disease Activity Following Each Treatment Course
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using an assessment of 28 joints, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (milliliter per hour \[ml/hr\]), and Patient's Global Assessment (PGH) of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*PGH of disease activity. Total score range: 0-10, with a higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission.
Time frame: Week 20
Population: Full analysis population included all participants who has fulfilled the eligibility criteria, and signed the informed consent form, participated at the screening examination. Here, number of participants analyzed is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With Remission (DAS28 <2.6) and Low Disease Activity Following Each Treatment Course | Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | 16.19 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participants With Remission (DAS28 <2.6) and Low Disease Activity Following Each Treatment Course | Low Disease Activity | 15 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participant With Good or Moderate Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to 10. DAS28 \<=3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 indicates moderate to high disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline (CFB) and the level of disease activity reached. Good response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and a CFB \>1.2. Moderate response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \>1.2 or \>0.6 to \<=1.2, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>1.2. No response: DAS28 \<=3.2 and CFB \>=0.6, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1 and CFB \<=0.6, DAS28 \>5.1 and CFB \>0.6 to \<=1.2 or \<=0.6.
Time frame: Week 20
Population: Full analysis population included all participants who has fulfilled the eligibility criteria, and signed the informed consent form, participated at the screening examination. Here, number of participants analyzed is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participant With Good or Moderate Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria | Present <=3.2; CFB >1.2 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participant With Good or Moderate Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria | Present <=3.2; CFB >0.6 to <=1.2 | 8.20 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participant With Good or Moderate Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria | Present >3.2 to <=5.1; CFB >1.2 | 43.03 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participant With Good or Moderate Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria | Present >3.2 to <=5.1; CFB >0.6 to <=1.2 | 9.00 percentage of participants |
| Rituximab | Percentage of Participant With Good or Moderate Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria | Present >5.1; CFB >1.2 | 14.54 percentage of participants |
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Week 20
HAQ is a self-completed patient questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. Calculate HAQ the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 20
Population: Intent to treat population included all participants who has fulfilled the eligibility criteria, and signed the informed consent form, participated to the screening exam, and have completed the baseline visit and at least one further assessment. Here, number of participant analysed is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Week 20 | Baseline | 2.62 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.737 |
| Rituximab | Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Week 20 | Week 20 | 1.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.715 |