Skip to content

A Comparative Study of Papacarie® and the Conventional Method for Dental Caries Treatment

Study of Papacarie® for Caries Removal.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01641861
Enrollment
488
Registered
2012-07-17
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2016-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries, Secondary Dental Caries, Personal Satisfaction

Keywords

Chemo-mechanical caries removal, Papacarie®

Brief summary

The purpose study are to evaluate the efficacy of Papacarie® for caries removal in comparison to the conventional drilling method.

Detailed description

Dental caries in children continues to affect a significant portion of the world population, especially in developing countries. There are many techniques used for dental caries treatment. The conventional method is to remove caries and prepare the cavity using dental burs. Disadvantages of this method; however, include the patients' repulsion of drilling, and possible thermal changes on tooth surface that may have an effect on the dental pulp tissues. In addition, the drilling technique frequently requires local anesthesia injections and sometimes results in the removal of sound tooth tissues. To overcome these problems and preserve the healthy dental tissues, the chemo-mechanical caries removal method was developed. The advantage by chemomechanical caries removal include less traumatic, less need local anesthesia, reduced chance of dental pulp exposure. And also it could be benefit to medical compromised patients. Papacarie® is a new chemo-mechanical technique for caries removal with few published research and case reports. A randomized controlled trial is therefore needed to determine the efficacy of its use in general population. The aims of this study are to evaluate the efficacy of a chemo-mechanical system (Papacarie®) for caries removal in comparison to the conventional drilling method.

Interventions

DEVICEPapacarie®

Papacarie® is chemo-mechanical method for caries removal

caries removal by using rotary instrument.

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health
CollaboratorNIH
Khon Kaen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient inclusion criteria: * Child is between 7-8 years of ages (at date of enrollment) with at least one active caries lesion in second primary molar tooth with distinct dentine involvement requiring restoration * Child is in good general health and has no existing health condition that may interfere with treatment such as asthma, tuberculosis, rheumatic fever/ congenital heart diseases, jaundice, juvenile diabetes, haemophilia, thalassemia, leukemia, anemia , HIV , allergy to any drug, and epilepsy. * Tooth inclusion criteria: * Second primary molar tooth with one active caries lesion with distinct dentine involvement requiring restoration using the World Health Organization Criteria. * Tooth with isolated occlusal caries and caries extended on further than two-third of the dentine layer, which can be restoration as a Class I restoration. * Carious cavity must be large enough so that the hand instruments can be operated. * Tooth is vital without pathological process assessed clinically and radiographically.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment Failuretwo yearsThe dental restorations were evaluated at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment. Evaluation criteria included the condition of the filling material and presence of secondary caries at the margin of the restorations. The restoration status was re-categorized as a binary outcome: Treatment failure (Yes/No).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Secondary Cariestwo yearsThe restoration teeth were assess by clinical and radiographic examination for detection the recurrent caries.
Number of Participants With Complete Caries Removalimmediately after treatmentThe efficacy of caries removal was evaluated by the visual and tactile criteria. The completeness of caries removal was judged on the basis of clinical criteria involving the inspection of the tooth surfaces using a good light source, dental mirror and explorer. A blunt explorer was used to detect surface roughness by gently stroking across the dentine surfaces and to evaluate the dentine hardness. Complete caries removal was achieved if as remove soft and infected dentine until felt hard and leathery consistency of the dentine surfaces. The tactile criteria include the smooth passage of the blunt explorer and absence of a catch or a tug-back sensation.
Levels of Pain and Discomfortimmediately after treatmentThe participants were assessed for the levels of pain and discomfort using the facial visual analogue scale (VAS). The score was recorded in ruler scale from 0-100 millimeters, 0 = no pain and 100 = extreme pain) before treatment with the child sitting on the dental chair and after treatment (completion of carious tissue removal). The difference in the VAS scores before and after treatment was calculated and compared between the two comparison groups.
Time Use for Caries RemovalImmediately while treatmentThe time taken for the removal of carious dentine was recorded using a stopwatch. Recorded time unit is seconds.

Countries

Thailand

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study population consists of students attending primary schools in Khon Kaen province, Thailand. Consented children were obtain clinical and radiographic examination at the Pediatric Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University (KKU) in order to evaluate for their eligibility. The recruitment period were November 2012 to August 2013.

Pre-assignment details

Among of 1299 children provided the consent and received an oral examination, 518 children received a radiographic examination for definite diagnosis. From 494 eligible children, 488 have been enrolled. The rest were not enrolled either because of parental refusal (n=2), child refusal (n=3), or the child moved to another province (n=1).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Arm
control arm is dental caries removal using the conventional method. Dental caries will be removed using rotary instrument following the usual procedures employed by the dentist. Conventional method: caries removal by using rotary instrument.
246
Intervention Arm
Intervention arm is dental caries removal using Papacarie®. The dentist will apply Papacarie® to dental cavity in order to soften the carious dentine. Dental caries will be removed using hand instrument. Papacarie®: Papacarie® is chemo-mechanical method for caries removal
242
Total488

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDied due to drowning01
Overall StudyLost the tooth due to normal exfoliation148
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2116

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl ArmIntervention ArmTotal
Age, Continuous89.9 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
89.2 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
89.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
129 Participants116 Participants245 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
117 Participants126 Participants243 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2460 / 242
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2460 / 242

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Failure

The dental restorations were evaluated at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment. Evaluation criteria included the condition of the filling material and presence of secondary caries at the margin of the restorations. The restoration status was re-categorized as a binary outcome: Treatment failure (Yes/No).

Time frame: two years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Control ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Failure2 participants
Intervention ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Failure2 participants
95% CI: [0.1, 7.3]
Secondary

Incidence of Secondary Caries

The restoration teeth were assess by clinical and radiographic examination for detection the recurrent caries.

Time frame: two years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Control ArmIncidence of Secondary Caries3 participants
Intervention ArmIncidence of Secondary Caries10 participants
95% CI: [0.9, 12.8]
Secondary

Levels of Pain and Discomfort

The participants were assessed for the levels of pain and discomfort using the facial visual analogue scale (VAS). The score was recorded in ruler scale from 0-100 millimeters, 0 = no pain and 100 = extreme pain) before treatment with the child sitting on the dental chair and after treatment (completion of carious tissue removal). The difference in the VAS scores before and after treatment was calculated and compared between the two comparison groups.

Time frame: immediately after treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Control ArmLevels of Pain and Discomfort25 Pain score from 0-100
Intervention ArmLevels of Pain and Discomfort10 Pain score from 0-100
p-value: 0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Number of Participants With Complete Caries Removal

The efficacy of caries removal was evaluated by the visual and tactile criteria. The completeness of caries removal was judged on the basis of clinical criteria involving the inspection of the tooth surfaces using a good light source, dental mirror and explorer. A blunt explorer was used to detect surface roughness by gently stroking across the dentine surfaces and to evaluate the dentine hardness. Complete caries removal was achieved if as remove soft and infected dentine until felt hard and leathery consistency of the dentine surfaces. The tactile criteria include the smooth passage of the blunt explorer and absence of a catch or a tug-back sensation.

Time frame: immediately after treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Control ArmNumber of Participants With Complete Caries Removal246 participants
Intervention ArmNumber of Participants With Complete Caries Removal242 participants
Secondary

Time Use for Caries Removal

The time taken for the removal of carious dentine was recorded using a stopwatch. Recorded time unit is seconds.

Time frame: Immediately while treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Control ArmTime Use for Caries Removal103 seconds
Intervention ArmTime Use for Caries Removal512 seconds
p-value: 0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026