Skip to content

Controlled Study in Cranioplasty Reconstruction

Multicenter Prospective Controlled Study in Cranioplasty Reconstruction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01641523
Enrollment
91
Registered
2012-07-16
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2015-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Decompression Injury, Cranioplasty

Keywords

Cranioplasty prosthesis, Hydroxyapatite, PolyMethylMethacrylate, Autologous Bone

Brief summary

Multicenter, prospective, comparative, observational study with regular follow-up visits. The project's aim is long-term follow-up of patients affected by large and complex craniolacuniae treated, in standard clinical practice, with CustomBone Service™ Cranial (porous bio-mimetic hydroxyapatite custom-made medical device for cranioplasty), autologous bone or polymethilmethacrylate customized prosthesis and to compare the clinical outcome and safety among the three treatments. Elegibility to each treatment will respect the standard clinical practice. Each investigator will respect his own hospital criteria for cranial reconstruction. Each centre's agreement to participate the study is totally voluntary. The study sample size has not been defined on statistical criteria: the study population was set at 100 consecutive patients treated with cranioplasty reconstruction with one of the three foreseen group. Each investigator will not be allowed to enrol more then 20 patients to avoid an enrolment imbalance between centres involved. Primary study end-points are: evaluation of adverse event incidence after surgical treatment. Secondary end-points are: quality of life improvement, evaluation of bone continuity restoration evaluated by CT scan analysis, neurological improvement.

Detailed description

Cranioplasty surgery is necessary everytime a craniolacuniae has to be reconstructed to ensure protection to the central nervous system. Cranioplasty surgery is classified into first line surgery, due to traumatic events or degenerative pathologies, and second line treatment, when due to first treatment failure, for example because of autologous bone reabsorption/infection or other material reject. Clinical evaluation scores Specific and validated clinical scores will be employed for End-points evaluation. CT scan will required in the pre-operation visit and in the post-operation time during the follow up visits to evaluate the bone-implant osteointegration process and osteointegration will be evaluated applying a specific score. Data have been recorded in a e-CRF with limited access, protected by personal password. Data will always be collected in an anonymous way, subjects identity will always be undisclosed. Each patient will be asked to give informed consent to partecipate the study.

Interventions

DEVICECustomBone Service

customized hydroxyapatite cranial prosthesis

Sponsors

Fin-Ceramica Faenza Spa
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients which need cranial reconstruction, 2. Cranioplasty reconstruction by autologous bone, hidroxyapatite or polymethylmethacrylate, 3. Patients of both sex in age range between 14 and 75 years old, 4. Craniolacuniae size \> 25 cm2 , 5. Patients affected by complex pathologies or fracture or infection of a previous implant. 6. Elegibility to CustomBone Service™ Cranial treatment will respect the product leaflet instructions. 7. Each investigator will respect his own medical centre internal inclusion criteria to cranial reconstruction.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients affected by important emocoagulation pathologies, 2. Patients affected by mellitus diabetes, 3. Patients affected by autoimmune pathology, 4. Patients unable to intend, 5. Patients affected by immunodepression.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety360 day after surgeryincidence of adverse event (infection, reabsorption, mobilization, fractures, dislocation) after surgical treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy90, 180, 360, 720 days after the surgeryQuality of life improvement evaluation: Disability Rating Scale(DRS); Neurological recovery evaluation: Neurological Objective Exam (EON), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GCS), motor deficit evaluation scale; Mechanical, biological and aesthetic outcome; CT scan evaluation;

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026