Skip to content

Phase III Study Comparing 3D Conformal Radiotherapy and Conformal Radiotherapy IMRT to Treat Endometrial Cancer

Phase III Study Comparing 3D Conformal Radiotherapy and Conformal Radiotherapy IMRT to Treat Endometrial Cancer of 70 Years Old Women : Contribution of Oncogeriatric Evaluation to the Study of Acute Toxicity

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01641497
Acronym
TOMOGYN
Enrollment
26
Registered
2012-07-16
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2017-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Cancer

Keywords

endometrial cancer, IMRT, age over 70

Brief summary

Comparison of radiotherapy tolerance (two types of radiotherapy) for patients over 70 years with a endometrial cancer.

Detailed description

Endometrial cancer is the most common form of gynecological cancer in France with 6560 new cases in 2010. Endometrial cancers occurs generally after menopause but are sometimes diagnosticated before 40 years. The 5 years Overall survival of endometrial cancer is 76% (95% for non locally advanced or non metastatic disease). Some factors are involved in disease prognostic: age, geographical origin, physical status, tumor grade, tumor histology and probably biomarkers. Some studies demonstrated that advanced age is a negative prognostic factor due to higher relapse risk and higher specific mortality. Unfortunately, Incidence of endometrial cancer will probably increase in future due to aging of the occidental population. Current treatment of endometrial cancer is based on post-operative radiation therapy: adjuvant brachytherapy or adjuvant external beam radiation therapy. However these techniques lead to serious toxicity (digestive toxicity, ileitis...) in elder patient. Consequently, pelvic radiation therapy is difficult to organize before 75 years and dangerous to perform after 80 years. However a new technique called: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) can make the difference. IMRT is a new high precision radiotherapy technique probably well adapted for old people, with less toxicity than current radiotherapy. Nevertheless, IMRT is not recognized as a standard radiation therapy procedure in France and Europe. Thus, goal of TOMOGYN study is to compare the tolerance of old women (at least 70 years), with endometrial cancer, treated with external beam radiation therapy or IMRT.

Interventions

RADIATION3D conformational radiation

25 \* 1.8 Gy in 5 weeks (=45 Gy)

RADIATIONIMRT

25 \* 1.8 Gy in 5 weeks (=45 Gy)

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* endometrial adenocarcinoma histologically proven * post op pelvic radiotherapy * age ≥ 70 * performance status ≤ 2 * MMSE ≥ 10 * life expectancy ≥ 3 months * social security covered * signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* type I stade IAGI and stade IAGIII without myometer infiltration, stade IIIc2 and IV adenocarcinoma * uterine sarcoma * surgery not in accordance with recommendations of Inca * previous uncontrolled or less than 5 years prior to diagnosis cancer * cons-indication for radiotherapy * diarrhea ≥ 3 per day * pelvic lymph nodes \> 1cm not resected during staging * previous sigmoid diverticulitis, crohn disease, systemic disease, ulcerative haemorrhagic, collagenosis, infectious peritonitis * IMRT other than tomotherapy * photon energy \< 10MV * patient under guardianship

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change from baseline in acute toxicity all along the radiationbaseline, Day 5, Day 10, Day 15, Day 20, Day 25, 1 Week after end of treatment, 8 Weeks after end of treatmentNCI CTCAE v 4.0 tox \> grade 2 will be compared

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
geriatric repercussionbaseline, 6 months after end of treatmentscales : Activities in Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities in Daily Living (IADL), Mini Nutritionnal Assessment (MNA), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), cognitive evaluation, Cumulative Illness RAting Scale-Geriatrics (CIRS-G), sociocultural questionnaire, walking and balance
duration of the radiationup to 5 weeks and a halfinterval between first day and last day of treatment
geriatric interventionup to 6 monthsnumber of intervention, consequences in terms of base treatment change, intervention of other specialists (except cancer)
late major toxicity1 week, 8 weeks, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the end of treatmentNCI CTCAE v 4.0
progression free survivalan average period of 2 yearsmedian time between date of inclusion and date of clinical or radialogical progression
quality of lifebaseline, Day 5, Day 10, Day 15, Day 20, Day 25, 1 week and 8 weeks after end of treatment, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after end of treatmentQLQ C30 questionnaire

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026