Skip to content

A Prospective Non-concurrent Controlled Evaluation of Open and MAS® PLIF

A Prospective Non-current Concurrent Controlled Evaluation of Open and MAS® PLIF for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Degenerative Conditions

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01640977
Enrollment
67
Registered
2012-07-16
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2025-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

Keywords

Open PLIF, MAS PLIF, Lumbar spine

Brief summary

The study is a prospective non-concurrent controlled observational evaluation of short-term operative results. As such, study sites will capture perioperative (through 6-week postoperative follow-up) case data associated with 10 standard open PLIF (posterior lumbar interbody fusion) procedures. After this open experience, these same sites will capture the corresponding data from 10 subsequent cases where the MAS (Maximum Access Surgery) PLIF variant was performed. The data from both series of cases will be compiled to identify similarities and differences between the techniques.

Detailed description

The objective of this evaluation is to collect and compare short-term factors related to the morbidity of approach using traditional posterior-approach interbody fusion techniques and a less invasive exposure for the same procedure. Perioperative measures and early outcomes will be documented to demonstrate differences in procedural requirements, safety, and early recovery. A total of 100 subjects will be consecutively enrolled in this prospective study from as many as 8 centers. Patients who, in the surgeon investigator's opinion, require instrumented lumbar interbody fusion and have consented to PLIF surgery for their conditions will be included. The following eligibility criteria are designed to identify existing clinic patients for whom study under this protocol is considered appropriate. All subjects must meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria in order to be considered for enrollment.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOpen PLIF (posterior lumbar interbody fusion)

The PLIF procedure achieves access to the degenerated disc from the back of the spine.

PROCEDUREMAS PLIF

The MAS PLIF technique is a minimally invasive variant of the traditional PLIF procedure. It is similarly performed through a single midline posterior incision but is conducted through a more medialized posterior approach.

Sponsors

NuVasive
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must meet all inclusion criteria to be eligible for enrollment into this observational study: 1. Indicated for posterior lumbar interbody fusion at one or two contiguous motion segments between L1 and S1; 2. 18+ years of age at the date of written informed consent; 3. Able to undergo surgery based on physical exam, medical history and surgeon judgment; 4. Willing and able to return for post-treatment exams according to the follow-up called for in the protocol; 5. Signed and dated informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects presenting with any of the following will not be included in this observational study: 1. Mental or physical condition that would limit the ability to comply with study requirements; 2. Spine abnormality requiring treatment at more than two levels; 3. Prior surgery at operative or adjacent level(s); 4. Involvement in active litigation relating to the spine (worker's compensation claim is allowed if it is not contested); 5. Significant general illness (e.g., HIV, active metastatic cancer of any type, uncontrolled diabetes, dialysis dependent renal failure, symptomatic liver disease); 6. Participating in another clinical study that would confound study data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complications6-weeksAll complications will be compiled and their incidence and relationship to the product and/or surgical procedure will be tabulated for comparison.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Outcomes6-weeksVisual analog scale (for patient self assessment of back/leg pain)
Radiographic Outcomes6-weeksRadiographic assessment (AP/lateral x-rays)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026