Skip to content

Imaging Study of Allocation of Pacing Targets in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

MRI Allocation of Pacing Targets in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01640769
Enrollment
210
Registered
2012-07-16
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2023-01-31
Last updated
2025-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Digital Twins, Dysynchrony, Image Guidance, Systolic Heart Failure

Keywords

Cardiomyopathy, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Image guided therapy, Digital twins, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MRI

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial will assess a cardiac MRI derived 4D digital cardiac model to optimized left and right ventricular lead delivery to improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Detailed description

Regional mechanical delay, myocardial scar, and inter-lead distance have each been demonstrated to be relevant variables for the realization of optimal response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Pilot study results have suggested clinical feasibility and potential value from LV and RV lead navigation aimed at optimizing these combined variables. A computer software program has been developed to deliver an interactive, 4D digital heart model of mechanical dyssynchrony and myocardial scar to guide LV and RV CRT lead delivery to optimal targets. This multi-center randomized clinical trial has been designed to assess the feasibility, safety and clinical impact of LV-RV lead navigation using a web-deployed 4D cardiac model.

Interventions

PROCEDURE4D Model guided delivery of cardiac pacing leads

4D model-guided placement of LV and RV leads to optimal myocardial targets, as derived from pre-procedural Cardiac MRI

PROCEDUREStandard CRT lead delivery

Standard lead delivery

Sponsors

Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Intervention model description

4 dimensional cardiac model to guide optimal delivery of left and right ventricular pacing leads in patients referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years. 2. Ejection fraction ≤ 35 %. 3. LBBB with QRS duration ≥ 120 msec. 4. NYHA class II-IV. 5. On maximum tolerated heart failure medication therapy ≥ 6 weeks. 6. Clinically accepted for CRT device implantation.

Exclusion criteria

1. Failure to provide consent. 2. CCS class III-IV angina. 3. Recent Q-wave myocardial infarction or revascularization procedure ( ≤ 3 months). 4. Atrial fibrillation at time of randomization \>6 weeks in duration 5. Standard contra-indications to MRI. 6. Documented severe allergy to intravenous contrast dye ( iodinated CT contrast or Gadolinium MRI contrast). 7. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) ≤ 45 ml/min/m2. 8. Patient is pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determination of response to image guided placement of cardiac ventricular pacing leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)6 monthsCardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) response will be defined as a change in the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction measured at 6 months post CRT device implant by MUGA (multigated acquisition scan / wall motion study).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart failure hospital admissions12 months
improvement in 6-minute hall walk ≥ 30 meters or ≥ 10%6 months6 minute hallwalk will be done at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class by ≥ 16 monthsNYHA class will be determined at baseline, 3 months and 6 months (score out of 4)
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) score by ≥ 10 points6 monthsA Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire will be administered at baseline, 3 months and 6 months (visual analogue score out of 100)
All-cause mortality12 months
Total procedural time6 monthTotal procedural time from first needle to skin closure, in minutes
Fluoroscopy dose and exposure time6 monthTotal fluoroscopy exposure time and radiation dose will be recorded at end of procedure and recorded (in minutes).
Procedural complications6 monthsAll procedural complications will be recorded following completion of procedure and at 3 and 6 months.
Device complications6 monthsAll device-related complications, inclusive of need for lead repositioning, will be recorded at 3 months and 6 months.
Rate of concordant lead delivery to the optimal myocardial target6 monthOn the day of procedure, a post lead implant bi-plane fluoroscopy image and PA-LAT CXR will be obtained. These will be reviewed by a core laboratory to score final lead tip (electrode) location using a standardized report form to determine delivery location based on the AHA segmental model.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026