Skip to content

Differential Efficacy of Supportive and Interpretative Psychodynamic Techniques for Dependent and Self-critical Depressive Patients

Differential Efficacy of Supportive and Interpretative Psychodynamic Techniques for Dependent and Self-critical Depressive Patients: an Experimental Single Case Design.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01640483
Acronym
PsychodynDep
Enrollment
120
Registered
2012-07-13
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2021-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

Post-hoc analysis of psychotherapy outcome data suggest that psychodynamic techniques for Major Depressive Disorder are differentially efficacious dependent on personality traits of the patient. More specifically, supportive techniques are hypothesized to be more efficacious for dependent patients, interpretative techniques to be more efficacious for self-critical patients, and mixed supportive/interpretative techniques to be more efficacious for mixed dependent/self-critical patients. Moreover, supportive techniques are hypothesized to impact on depressive symptoms through increased relational capacities while interpretative techniques impact through increased self-understanding. These hypotheses are tested in an experimental single case design with three dependent, three self-critical and three mixed dependent/self-critical depressive patients. These patients go through a time-limited (50 sessions) experimental treatment which exists of a sequence of four A phases (control conditions), one B phase (supportive techniques only), one C phase (interpretative techniques only), and one BC phase (mixed supportive/interpretative techniques).

Interventions

OTHERpsychodynamic techniques.

the patients go through a time-limited (50 sessions, 45 minutes, 2 sessions/week) experimental treatment which exists of a sequence of four A phases (control conditions), one B phase (supportive techniques only), one C phase (interpretative techniques only), and one BC phase (mixed supportive/interpretative techniques).

Sponsors

Funding by BOF (Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient meets criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (as assessed by SCID-I and DSM-IV-TR) * Patient is prepared to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patient uses antidepressant medication during the treatment * Patient scores 3 on the suicide item of the BDI-II * Patient meets criteria for psychotic or personality disorder (as assessed by SCID-II)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction in depressive symptoms at 25 weeks (50 sessions, 2 sessions/week).25 weeks•Measures each session: The BDI-II with adapted instructions is used to measure depressive symptoms. The process variables associated with change in depressive symptoms will be studied in an exploratory way by means of Psychotherapy Process Q Set (PQS) ratings of the transcripts of the sessions. •Measures during A phases: Besides the SCID-I (session 1 and 2 of each A phase) and SCID-II (session 3 of each A phase) interviews, the therapist will administer the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
improvement in relational capacities25 weeks• Measures that are applied each session (also during A phases): The relational capacities (CDPS-RC) and insight (CDPS-IN) subscales of the Capacity for Dynamic Process Scale (CDPRS) of nine researcher-rated items. • Measures that are applied during A phases: The therapist will administer the Clinical Diagnostic Interview (CDI, session 4 and 5 of each A phase),and a broad-spectrum set of self-report outcome measures, including the Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R), the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems - 64 (IIP-64), the SELVES and the Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI).
improvement in insight25 weeks* Measures that are applied each session (also during A phases): The relational capacities (CDPS-RC) and insight (CDPS-IN) subscales of the Capacity for Dynamic Process Scale (CDPRS) of nine researcher-rated items. * Measures that are applied during A phases: The therapist will administer the Clinical Diagnostic Interview (CDI, session 4 and 5 of each A phase),and a broad-spectrum set of self-report outcome measures, including the Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R), the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems - 64 (IIP-64), the SELVES and the Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI).
improvement in quality of life, a broad range of physical and psychological symptoms.25 weeksMeasures that are applied each session (also during A phases): The relational capacities (CDPS-RC) and insight (CDPS-IN) subscales of the Capacity for Dynamic Process Scale (CDPRS) of nine researcher-rated items. Measures that are applied during A phases: The therapist will administer the Clinical Diagnostic Interview (CDI, session 4 and 5 of each A phase),and a broad-spectrum set of self-report outcome measures, including the Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R), the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems - 64 (IIP-64), the SELVES and the Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI).

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026