Skip to content

Technology Enhanced Community Health Nursing (TECH-N) Study

Technology Enhanced Community Health Nursing (TECH-N) to Prevent Recurrent Sexually Transmitted Infections After Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01640379
Acronym
TECH-N
Enrollment
286
Registered
2012-07-13
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2017-04-30
Last updated
2020-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID)

Keywords

Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID), Community Health Nursing, Text Messaging, mobile health (mhealth), Adolescents

Brief summary

The investigators are enrolling 350 young women 13-25 years old diagnosed with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in Baltimore and randomize them to receive community health nurse (CHN) clinical support using a single post-PID face-to-face clinical evaluation and short messaging system communication support during the 30. The investigators hypothesize that repackaging the recommended Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) follow-up visit using a technology-enhanced community health nursing intervention (TECH-N) with integration of an evidence-based sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention curriculum will reduce rates of short-term repeat infection by improving adherence to PID treatment and reducing unprotected intercourse and be more cost-effective compared with outpatient standard of care (and hospitalization).

Detailed description

Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) remains a serious reproductive health disorder and disease rates remain unacceptably high among minority adolescent girls and young adult women. Each episode of this upper reproductive tract infection, usually caused by a sexually transmitted infection (STI), increases the risk for multiple sequelae including tubal infertility, ectopic pregnancy, and chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Previous research demonstrates that inpatient treatment for PID is expensive without incremental increases in effectiveness when compared with outpatient treatment. The investigators' work and that of others suggest that additional outpatient cost-effective PID health care supports are needed for this vulnerable population to improve short and long-term reproductive health outcomes, including recurrent sexually transmitted infection and PID. Prior research has also demonstrated that community health nurse (CHN) interventions can increase access to appropriate resources enhance health care utilization and promote risk-reducing behavior. The investigators propose that integrating a technology component conducted by the CHN will increase appeal to adolescent females. The investigators' pilot data of a text messaging intervention for reproductive health clinical reminders has demonstrated that use of cell phones to assist urban adolescents residing in high STI prevalent communities with self-care is both highly acceptable and feasible. The investigators hypothesize that repackaging the recommended CDC-follow-up visit using a technology-enhanced community health nursing intervention (TECH-N) with integration of an evidence-based STI prevention curriculum will reduce rates of short-term repeat infection by improving adherence to PID treatment and reducing unprotected intercourse and be more cost-effective compared with outpatient standard of care (and hospitalization). We are enrolling 350 young women 13-21years old diagnosed with PID in Baltimore and randomizing them to receive CHN clinical support using a single post-PID face-to-face clinical evaluation and SMS communication support during the 30-days following the PID diagnosis or optimized standard of care.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTechnology Enhanced Community Health Nursing

* Text-messaging (twice daily medication reminders w/ positive adherence messages, positive sexual health messages throughout the 30 day treatment period) * Enhanced community health nursing visit on day 3-5, includes evidence-based STI/HIV prevention component (Sister to Sister Teen)

Sponsors

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
13 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Mild-moderate PID * Outpatient treatment disposition * Permanently reside in the Baltimore Metropolitan area * Willing to sign informed consent & be randomized

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant * Concurrent diagnosis of Sexual Assault * Unable to communicate/complete study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Positive Sexually Transmitted Infection Test (STI)90 DaysSTI testing (positive Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) or Chlamydia trachomatis CT) tested at 90 days using nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants That Adhered to Self-treatmentDay 15Completion of 72-hour assessment visit by medical provider, medication adherence (self-reported), partner notification, partner treatment, and temporary sexual abstinence

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
Experimental: TECH-N Participants receive the Technology Enhanced Community Health Nursing Visit (community health nursing visits within 5 days during which Sister to Sister and clinical assessment performed and text-messaging support
149
Control
Participants receive enhanced standard of care
137
Total286

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionControlTotal
Age, Continuous18.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
18.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
18.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
Positive Sexually Transmitted Infection Test (GC or CT)16 Participants9 Participants25 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
136 Participants126 Participants262 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
149 participants137 participants286 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
149 Participants137 Participants286 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1490 / 137
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 1490 / 137
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1490 / 137

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Positive Sexually Transmitted Infection Test (STI)

STI testing (positive Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) or Chlamydia trachomatis CT) tested at 90 days using nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT).

Time frame: 90 Days

Population: Adolescent and young adult women with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in Baltimore City randomized to the intervention or control group and also had results for chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (GC) at 90 days after enrollment. All enrolled participants were followed as long as possible for entire 90 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TECH-NNumber of Participants With Positive Sexually Transmitted Infection Test (STI)6 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Positive Sexually Transmitted Infection Test (STI)13 Participants
Comparison: A comparison of Chlamydia or Gonorrhea positivity at 90 days post intervention.p-value: 0.0795% CI: [0.15, 1.09]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: We used generalized estimating equations to test for a difference in the trend of chlamydia or gonorrhea (CT/GC) rates over the study period.~The null hypothesis is that rates of CT/GC for women in the intervention arm were changing over the study period similarly to CT/GC rates in the control arm.p-value: 0.04395% CI: [0.39, 0.98]generalized estimating equations
Secondary

Number of Participants That Adhered to Self-treatment

Completion of 72-hour assessment visit by medical provider, medication adherence (self-reported), partner notification, partner treatment, and temporary sexual abstinence

Time frame: Day 15

Population: Chi-square test results from participants in the intervention and control groups who had data on adherence to treatment. Out of 149 enrolled in the intervention arm, 10 were lost to followup by 72 hours. Out of 137 enrolled in the control arm, 15 were lost by 72 hours and so are missing this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TECH-NNumber of Participants That Adhered to Self-treatment131 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants That Adhered to Self-treatment20 Participants
Comparison: H0: Women in TECHN arm had 72 hour visit with same frequency as women in control arm.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [37, 230.1]Chi-squared
Comparison: H0: Women in TECHN arm reported complete adherence to medication regimen (yes or no) with same frequency as women in control arm.p-value: 0.08495% CI: [0.36, 1.05]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: H0: Women in TECHN arm notified their partners about their diagnoses more often than women in the control arm.p-value: 0.86795% CI: [0.36, 2.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: H0: Partners of women receiving the TECH-N intervention were treated more often than the partners of women in the control arm.p-value: 0.15395% CI: [0.33, 1.19]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: H0: Women in the TECHN arm practiced temporary sexual abstinence for two weeks after their diagnosis more often than those in the control arm.p-value: 0.35195% CI: [0.86, 1.06]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026