Skip to content

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With iFuse Implant System (SIFI)

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With iFuse Implant System (SIFI)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01640353
Acronym
SIFI
Enrollment
194
Registered
2012-07-13
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2017-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Sacroiliitis, Sacroiliac Joint Disruption

Keywords

si joint, si joint pain, si joint injury, si joint treatment, si joint injections, si joint inflammation, si joint problems, si joint symptoms, hypermobile si joint, si joint arthritis, si joint pain treatment, inflamed si joint, si joint sclerosis, locked si joint, si joint injuries, si joint disease, si joint infection, sacroiliac joint pelvic pain, sacroiliac joint arthritis treatment

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the iFuse Implant System to treat degenerative sacroiliitis (arthritis of the SI joint) and sacroiliac disruption (abnormal separation or tearing of the sacroiliac joint). The iFuse Implant System (iFuse device) is a medical device that is surgically implanted into the sacroiliac (SI) joint during a minimally invasive surgical procedure (one that uses a smaller incision and less damage to the skin and other tissues than standard surgery). The purpose of implanting the device is to stabilize and fuse the SI joint.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

SI-BONE, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1\. Age 21-70 at time of screening 2\. Patient has lower back pain for \>6 months inadequately responsive to conservative care 3\. Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint disruption or degenerative sacroiliitis based on ALL of the following: 1. Patient has pain at or close to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) with possible radiation into buttocks, posterior thigh or groin and can point with a single finger to the location of pain (Fortin Finger Test), and 2. Patient has at least 3 of 5 physical examination maneuvers specific for the SI joint (see Table 3), and 3. Patient has improvement in lower back pain numeric rating scale (NRS) of at least 50% after injection of local anesthetic into affected SI joint(s) (see Section 3.6.4), and 4. One or more of the following: i. SI joint disruption: 1. Asymmetric SI joint widening on X-ray or CT scan 2. Leakage of contrast on diagnostic arthrography ii. Degenerative sacroiliitis: 1. Radiographic evidence of SI joint degeneration, including sclerosis,osteophytes, subchondral cysts, or vacuum phenomenon on CT or plain film, or 2. Due to prior lumbosacral spine fusion 4\. Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of at least 30% 5. Baseline SI joint pain score of at least 50 on 0-100 mm visual analog scale 6. Patient has signed study-specific informed consent form 7. Patient has the necessary mental capacity to participate and is physically able to comply with study protocol requirements

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe back pain due to other causes, such as lumbar disc degeneration, lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar facet degeneration, and lumbar vertebral body fracture 2. Other known sacroiliac pathology such as: 1. Sacral dysplasia 2. Inflammatory sacroiliitis (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis or other HLA-associated spondyloarthropathy) 3. Tumor 4. Infection 5. Acute fracture 6. Crystal arthropathy 3. History of recent (\< 1 year) major trauma to pelvis 4. Previously diagnosed osteoporosis (defined as prior T-score \<-2.5 or history of osteoporotic fracture). 5. Osteomalacia or other metabolic bone disease 6. Chronic rheumatologic condition (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) 7. Any condition or anatomy that makes treatment with the iFuse Implant System infeasible 8. Chondropathy 9. Known allergy to titanium or titanium alloys 10. Use of medications known to have detrimental effects on bone quality and soft-tissue healing 11. Prominent neurologic condition that would interfere with physical therapy 12. Current local or systemic infection that raises the risk of surgery 13. Patient currently receiving or seeking worker's compensation, disability remuneration, and/or involved in injury litigation. 14. Currently pregnant or planning pregnancy in the next 2 years 15. Patient is a prisoner or a ward of the state. 16. Known or suspected drug or alcohol abuse 17. Diagnosed psychiatric disease (e.g., schizophrenia, major depression, personality disorders) that could interfere with study participation 18. Patient is participating in an investigational study or has been involved in an investigational study within 3 months prior to evaluation for participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject SuccessBaseline and 6 monthsComposite endpoint of reduction from baseline in VAS back pain score by at least 20 mm, lack of device-related serious adverse events, absence of neurologic worsening and absence of surgical re-intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Back Dysfunction24 monthsOswestry Disability Index is a validated patient questionnaire aiming to assess low back pain. The computed scores can be 0% to 100%. Lower scores indicate low disability while high scores indicate high disability. There are 10 questions on the questionnaire. Each has 6 possible answers (0 points - 5 points). If the question is skipped, it's points are subtracted from the denominator. If the raw score is 30 and all 10 questions were answered, the calculation would be 30 / 50 = 60%. If one question was skipped, it would be 30 / 45 = 67%.
Change in Quality of LifeBaseline and 24 monthsChange in QOL as measured by Short Form-36 PCS and EQ-5D at post-operative visits
Change in SI Joint Pain on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-100 mm)24 monthsThe Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 100 mm line on which the subject indicates their level of pain. 0 = no pain. 100 = worst imaginable pain.
Work StatusBasline, 24 monthsProportion of non-working subjects who return to work
Serious Adverse EventsProcedure, discharge, 1,3,6,12,18 and 24 monthsOccurrence of adverse events meeting the ISO14155:2011 definition of serious occurring during the procedure, at the time of hospital discharge (typically day of or next day after procedure), and at various times in late follow-up.
Ambulatory Status24 monthsPercentage of population fully ambulatory at 24 months post operatively.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
SI Joint Fusion with iFuse implant system
172
Total172

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyEarly site termination3
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5
Overall StudyWithdrawn from analysis at term site12
Overall StudyWithdrew prior to treatment10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSacroiliac Joint Fusion
Age, Continuous50.9 Years
Baseline EQ-5D.43 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.18
Baseline ODI55.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
Baseline SF-36 PCS31.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
Baseline SIJ pain79.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Duration of prior pain5.1 Years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
165 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
166 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
172 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
120 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants
SF-36 MCS38.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
153 / 172
serious
Total, serious adverse events
67 / 172

Outcome results

Primary

Subject Success

Composite endpoint of reduction from baseline in VAS back pain score by at least 20 mm, lack of device-related serious adverse events, absence of neurologic worsening and absence of surgical re-intervention.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Of 194 subjects who were eligible and signed informed consent, 10 voluntarily withdrew prior to SIJF. All data from 12 subjects at a single center were excluded due to early termination of the site. 172 subjects were treated. 168 had 6 months of follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sacroiliac Joint FusionSubject Success80.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Ambulatory Status

Percentage of population fully ambulatory at 24 months post operatively.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: 148 participants had ambulatory status at 24 month post-operatively

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sacroiliac Joint FusionAmbulatory Status89.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Back Dysfunction

Oswestry Disability Index is a validated patient questionnaire aiming to assess low back pain. The computed scores can be 0% to 100%. Lower scores indicate low disability while high scores indicate high disability. There are 10 questions on the questionnaire. Each has 6 possible answers (0 points - 5 points). If the question is skipped, it's points are subtracted from the denominator. If the raw score is 30 and all 10 questions were answered, the calculation would be 30 / 50 = 60%. If one question was skipped, it would be 30 / 45 = 67%.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: 147 of participants had ODI at 24 months post-operatively.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sacroiliac Joint FusionChange in Back Dysfunction24.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life

Change in QOL as measured by Short Form-36 PCS and EQ-5D at post-operative visits

Time frame: Baseline and 24 months

Population: 148 participants had QOL information at 24 months post-operatively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sacroiliac Joint FusionChange in Quality of LifeSF36 PCS8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Sacroiliac Joint FusionChange in Quality of LifeSF36 MCS10.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Sacroiliac Joint FusionChange in Quality of LifeEQ5D TTO.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Secondary

Change in SI Joint Pain on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-100 mm)

The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 100 mm line on which the subject indicates their level of pain. 0 = no pain. 100 = worst imaginable pain.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: 148 subjects had SIJ pain scores at 24 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sacroiliac Joint FusionChange in SI Joint Pain on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-100 mm)53.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.6
Secondary

Serious Adverse Events

Occurrence of adverse events meeting the ISO14155:2011 definition of serious occurring during the procedure, at the time of hospital discharge (typically day of or next day after procedure), and at various times in late follow-up.

Time frame: Procedure, discharge, 1,3,6,12,18 and 24 months

Population: 149 participants had 24 months of follow up post-operatively.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sacroiliac Joint FusionSerious Adverse Events100 serious adverse event
Secondary

Work Status

Proportion of non-working subjects who return to work

Time frame: Basline, 24 months

Population: Participants with work status data at 24 months post-operatively who were not working due to back pain (at baseline 37.4% were not working due to back pain).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sacroiliac Joint FusionWork Status25.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026