Skip to content

Laboratory-Treated T Cells in Treating Patients With High-Risk Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, or Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Previously Treated With Donor Stem Cell Transplant

Phase I/II Study of Adoptive Immunotherapy After Allogeneic HCT With Virus Specific CD8+ T Cells That Have Been Transduced to Express a WT1-Specific T Cell Receptor for Patients With Relapsed AML

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01640301
Enrollment
47
Registered
2012-07-13
Start date
2012-12-06
Completion date
2020-03-20
Last updated
2022-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Donor, Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipient, HLA-A*0201 Positive Cells Present, Recurrent Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Recurrent Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Recurrent Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Brief summary

This phase I/II trial studies the side effects of laboratory-treated T cells and to see how well they work in treating patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) that has returned after a period of improvement (relapsed), previously treated with donor stem cell transplant. Biological therapies, such as cellular adoptive immunotherapy, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. Placing a gene that has been created in the laboratory into a person's T cells may make the body build an immune response to kill cancer cells.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Determine the safety and potential toxicities associated with treating patients with high risk or relapsed AML, MDS, and CML after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) by adoptive transfer of virus-specific cluster of differentiation (CD)8 T cells genetically-modified to express a high affinity Wilms tumor 1 (WT1)-specific T cell receptor (TCR). II. Determine the anti-leukemic activity associated with treating patients with relapsed AML, MDS and CML after allogeneic HCT by adoptive transfer of virus-specific CD8 T cells genetically-modified to express a high affinity WT1-specific T cell receptor (TCR). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Determine the in vivo persistence of transferred T cells and ability to migrate to and accumulate in bone marrow. II. Determine the maintenance of TCR expression and function of transduced T cells. OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients with no evidence of leukemia post-HCT receive WT1-sensitized T cells intravenously (IV) over 45 minutes (or longer for patients who are 15-30 kg) on days 0 and 14 and aldesleukin subcutaneously (SC) twice daily (BID) on days 14-28. ARM II: Patients with evidence of AML (minimal residual disease or overt relapse) post-HCT receive cyclophosphamide IV and fludarabine phosphate IV daily on days -4 to -2. Patients also receive WT1-sensitized T cells IV over 45 minutes (or longer for patients who are 15-30 kg) on days 0 and 21 and aldesleukin SC BID on days 14-28. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up weekly for 4 weeks, at weeks 6 and 8, at 3, 6, 12 months, and then annually for up to 15 years.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAldesleukin

Given SC

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Given IV

DRUGFludarabine Phosphate

Given IV

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

BIOLOGICALWT1-Sensitized Allogeneic T-Lymphocytes

Given IV

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must express HLA-A\*0201 * Patients who are currently undergoing or who previously underwent matched allogeneic HCT for: * AML: Prospective enrollment will now be limited to patients with relapsed disease (overt relapse or minimal residual disease) at any time post allogeneic HCT * MDS will no longer be a criterion for eligibility * CML will no longer be a criterion for eligibility * Patients must have an HLA-matched donor of hematopoietic stem cells (related or unrelated) * Patients must be able to provide blood and bone marrow samples and undergo the procedures required for this protocol * Patients must be \>= 15 kg, as patients with lower weight would be incapable of providing high volume and frequent blood samples for monitoring and analysis * Patients must be able to give informed consent; parent or legal representative will be asked to consent for patients younger than 18 year old * DONOR: Patient and donor (related or unrelated) must be HLA-matched and express HLA-A\*0201 * DONOR: Donor must be Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) or cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositive * DONOR: Donor must be age 18 or older * DONOR: In good general health * DONOR: Able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Central nervous system (CNS) tumor refractory to intrathecal chemotherapy and/or cranio-spinal radiation * In patients whose leukemic cells are available for evaluation, the expression of WT1 in the patient's bone marrow will be determined; if WT1 expression in the patient's bone marrow is not highly expressed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the patient will be excluded from the study; patients with no evaluable leukemia will be eligible for enrollment based on the high frequency of positive leukemias (\> 90%), and leukemia will be evaluated for WT1 expression if recurrence is detected * Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositive; testing for HIV should be within 6 months of enrollment * Medical or psychological conditions that would make the patient unsuitable candidate for cell therapy at the discretion of the principal investigator (PI) * Pregnancy or breast-feeding; women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-hCG) pregnancy test result within 14 days before the first dose of WT1-specific T cell infusion; woman of non-childbearing potential will be defined as being postmenopausal greater than one year or who have had a bilateral tubal ligation or hysterectomy; all recipients of WT1-specific T cells will be counseled to use effective birth control during participation in this study and for 12 months after the last T cell infusion * DONOR: Less than 18 years old * DONOR: Active infectious hepatitis * DONOR: HIV or human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) seropositive * DONOR: Pregnancy or nursing * DONOR: Significant medical conditions (e.g. immunosuppressive therapy) that would make the donor an unsuitable T cell donor * DONOR: Unable to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment-related Toxicity Rate (Arm II)Up to 30 days after last study intervention per patientOutcome will be reported as a count of participants that experienced adverse events. Toxicity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0
Count of Participants Who Experienced Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) (Arm I)Up to 1 year
Count of Participants Who Experienced Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) (Arm II)Up to 1 year
Count of Participants Who Experienced Grade III-IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) (Arm II)Up to 1 year following infusion per patient
Count of Participants Who Experienced Grade III-IV Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) (Arm I)Up to 1 year
Treatment-related Toxicity Rate (Arm I)Up to 30 days after last study intervention per patientOutcome will be reported as a count of participants that experienced adverse events. Toxicity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0
Anti-leukemic Potential Efficacy, in Terms of Duration of Response (Arm II)Up to 1 yearResponse is assessed throughout the 1 year post treatment timeframe. Morphologic criteria for response: Complete Response (CR) = Bone Marrow blasts \<5%; no blasts with Auer rods; no extramedullary disease. Transfusion independent. Platelets ≥ 100,000/μl Absolute neutrophil count \>1000/μl (CRi: incomplete hematologic recovery CRp: incomplete platelet recovery) Partial Response (PR) = Decrease of at least 50% in the percentage of blasts to 5-25% in the bone marrow and the normalization of blood counts as for CR. (PRi and PRp if incomplete hematologic or platelet recovery) Stable Disease (SD) = Failure to achieve at least PR, but no evidence of progression for \>4 weeks.
Efficacy, in Terms of Relapse Rate (Arm I)At 1 year post-transplant

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Maintenance of Function of Transduced T Cells (Arm I)Up to 28 days post intervention per patient
Time to Progression After T Cell Therapy (Arm I)Up to 1 year
Disease-free Survival After T Cell TherapyUp to 1 year
Incidence of Relapse After T Cell Therapy (Arm II)Up to 1 year
Maintenance of T Cell Receptor (TCR) Expression of Transduced T Cells (Arm I) i.e. PersistenceUp to 28 days post intervention per patient

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

47 participants were enrolled on the study, meaning they signed the consent for treatment. However, 19 did not move on to treatment for various reasons.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I (High-risk for Relapse After HCT)
Patients with no evidence of leukemia or MDS post-HCT receive WT1-sensitized T cells IV over 45 minutes (or longer for patients who are 15-30 kg) on days 0 and 14 and aldesleukin SC BID on days 14-28. Aldesleukin: Given SC Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies WT1-Sensitized Allogeneic T-Lymphocytes: Given IV
13
Arm II (Relapsed After HCT)
Patients with evidence of AML (minimal residual disease or overt relapse) post-HCT receive cyclophosphamide IV and fludarabine phosphate IV daily on days -4 to -2. Patients also receive WT1-sensitized T cells IV over 45 minutes (or longer for patients who are 15-30 kg) on days 0 and 21 and aldesleukin SC BID on days 14-28. Aldesleukin: Given SC Cyclophosphamide: Given IV Fludarabine Phosphate: Given IV Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies WT1-Sensitized Allogeneic T-Lymphocytes: Given IV
15
Total28

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath08

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm I (High-risk for Relapse After HCT)Arm II (Relapsed After HCT)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
13 Participants15 Participants28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants15 Participants28 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants15 participants28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants9 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 138 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 1315 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 135 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Anti-leukemic Potential Efficacy, in Terms of Duration of Response (Arm II)

Response is assessed throughout the 1 year post treatment timeframe. Morphologic criteria for response: Complete Response (CR) = Bone Marrow blasts \<5%; no blasts with Auer rods; no extramedullary disease. Transfusion independent. Platelets ≥ 100,000/μl Absolute neutrophil count \>1000/μl (CRi: incomplete hematologic recovery CRp: incomplete platelet recovery) Partial Response (PR) = Decrease of at least 50% in the percentage of blasts to 5-25% in the bone marrow and the normalization of blood counts as for CR. (PRi and PRp if incomplete hematologic or platelet recovery) Stable Disease (SD) = Failure to achieve at least PR, but no evidence of progression for \>4 weeks.

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Population: 4 patients in Arm II did not relapse and were not assessed. 1 pt progressed at their D365 visit timepoint which landed on D367. They were included in the count of participants that passed within their 1 year follow-up timeframe.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)Anti-leukemic Potential Efficacy, in Terms of Duration of Response (Arm II)28 days
Primary

Count of Participants Who Experienced Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) (Arm I)

Time frame: Up to 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)Count of Participants Who Experienced Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) (Arm I)6 Participants
Primary

Count of Participants Who Experienced Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) (Arm II)

Time frame: Up to 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)Count of Participants Who Experienced Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) (Arm II)8 Participants
Primary

Count of Participants Who Experienced Grade III-IV Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) (Arm I)

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Population: All patients were evaluated for aGvHD greater than or equal to Grade 3

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)Count of Participants Who Experienced Grade III-IV Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) (Arm I)1 Participants
Primary

Count of Participants Who Experienced Grade III-IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) (Arm II)

Time frame: Up to 1 year following infusion per patient

Population: 2 patients were unevaluable for this outcome due to old documentation, unable to discern if the patient had acute GvHD greater than or equal to grade 3.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)Count of Participants Who Experienced Grade III-IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) (Arm II)0 Participants
Primary

Efficacy, in Terms of Relapse Rate (Arm I)

Time frame: At 1 year post-transplant

Population: No patients in Arm I relapsed, so overall number of participants analyzed is 0

Primary

Treatment-related Toxicity Rate (Arm I)

Outcome will be reported as a count of participants that experienced adverse events. Toxicity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0

Time frame: Up to 30 days after last study intervention per patient

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)Treatment-related Toxicity Rate (Arm I)12 Participants
Primary

Treatment-related Toxicity Rate (Arm II)

Outcome will be reported as a count of participants that experienced adverse events. Toxicity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0

Time frame: Up to 30 days after last study intervention per patient

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)Treatment-related Toxicity Rate (Arm II)15 Participants
Secondary

Disease-free Survival After T Cell Therapy

Time frame: Up to 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)Disease-free Survival After T Cell Therapy13 Participants
Arm II (Relapsed After HCT)Disease-free Survival After T Cell Therapy7 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Relapse After T Cell Therapy (Arm II)

Time frame: Up to 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)Incidence of Relapse After T Cell Therapy (Arm II)9 Participants
Secondary

Maintenance of Function of Transduced T Cells (Arm I)

Time frame: Up to 28 days post intervention per patient

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)Maintenance of Function of Transduced T Cells (Arm I)9 Participants
Secondary

Maintenance of T Cell Receptor (TCR) Expression of Transduced T Cells (Arm I) i.e. Persistence

Time frame: Up to 28 days post intervention per patient

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 2 (Avelumab, MHC Class I Up-regulation, T Cells)Maintenance of T Cell Receptor (TCR) Expression of Transduced T Cells (Arm I) i.e. Persistence12 Participants
Secondary

Time to Progression After T Cell Therapy (Arm I)

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Population: No patients analyzed because no patients relapsed in Arm I

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026