Skip to content

Comparison for the Patient With Alzheimer Disease the Impact of Three Different Groups of Patient Care

Comparaison du Service Rendu à la Personne Atteinte d'Une Maladie d'Alzheimer et de l'Aidant Par Trois Types de Prises en Charge (Plateforme, Accueil de Jour et Groupe contrôle

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01639586
Acronym
COMPARSE
Enrollment
360
Registered
2012-07-12
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2013-04-30
Last updated
2023-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease

Brief summary

One of the interests of the Alzheimer Plan 2008-2010 is to provide increase support to helping families. It's also of major to involve the patient in the most active treatment possible, encouraging social inter relationship as well as cognitive and behavioural stimulation activities. In the frame of non drug related approaches to Alzheimer disease (AD), several research projects and actions have already been conducted, but no specific study concerning the efficiency of different types of respite care structures have been conducted so far in France. The present project concerns the thematic of the frame Development and diversification of respite care structures. A platform is defined in the Alzheimer Plan as a diversified range of despite structures according to patients' needs and informal caregivers' expectations providing several objectives: Two objectives targeting the informal caregivers: * offer spare time or tutored * inform, support and accompany Two objectives targeting the patients: * encourage maintain of the patient social life and relationships and work together towards his/her psychological and emotional well-being * contribute to improve functional cognitive and sensory capacities The study COMPARSE suggests to compare for the patient - informal caregiver couple, the impact of three different groups of patient care on health profit; resit platform (P), the day care group (D), the control group without access to a respite structure (C).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALrespite platform

Impact of the respite platform patient care on health profit

BEHAVIORALDay care

Impact of the day care on health profit of patient

BEHAVIORALNo access to a respite structure

Control group without access to a respite structure

Sponsors

Department of Clinical Research and Innovation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient affect by Alzheimer disease or related pathology * patient with an informal caregiver * patient not using any respite structure * signed informed consent (patient and informal caregiver) * affiliate to social security

Exclusion criteria

* patient without informal caregiver * patient include in another clinical protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analysis of the perceived and diagnosed health evolution of the patientat baseline, one month and nine monthRealize neuropsychological evaluation and satisfaction degree evaluation of the patient and the informal caregiver to compare different types of respite care structures

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacity of the different structuresat baseline, one month and nine monthAssess autonomy level of patient Realize sociological qualitative analysis and economic evaluation by comparing differents structures

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026