Skip to content

Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Cisplatin or High-Dose Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin Hydrochloride, and Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Urothelial Cancer

Randomized Phase II Trial Of Adjuvant Chemotherapy For Urothelial Carcinoma Comparing GC To Dose-Dense MVAC

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01639521
Enrollment
0
Registered
2012-07-12
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2014-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Urethral Cancer, Localized Transitional Cell Cancer of the Renal Pelvis and Ureter, Posterior Urethral Cancer, Recurrent Bladder Cancer, Recurrent Urethral Cancer, Regional Transitional Cell Cancer of the Renal Pelvis and Ureter, Stage III Bladder Cancer, Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder, Ureter Cancer, Urethral Cancer Associated With Invasive Bladder Cancer

Brief summary

This study is about two chemotherapy study drug combinations (regimens) that are used for urothelial (bladder or upper urinary tract) cancer. Both study drug regimens, gemcitabine (gemcitabine hydrochloride) plus cisplatin, and high-dose-intensity MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin plus cisplatin), are standard chemotherapy regimens. Both regimens are used to treat people with urothelial cancer that has spread to other organs. Both study drug regimens have been proven to be effective in lowering the risk of the cancer coming back, but it is not known which regimen is the best. This study hopes to learn whether there is a difference in the effectiveness and side effects of these two study drug regimens when they are given to people who have had their urothelial cancer completely removed.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES To estimate the difference in the rate of unacceptable toxicity for dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) and gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in the adjuvant treatment of urothelial cancer. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES To compare rates of disease recurrence at 3 years between dose-dense MVAC and GC. To determine whether molecular markers excision repair cross-complementing-1 (ERCC-1) ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase M-1 (RRM-1), breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) topoisomerase 2-alpha (Top2A) and protein 53 (p53) can predict those patients more likely to benefit from chemotherapy. To investigate the potential utility of cytidine deaminase (CDA), ERCC-1, xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD), glutathione S-transferase P-1 (GSTP-1) and glutathione S-transferase M-1 (GSTM-1) as molecular markers which predict occurrence of significant toxicity during adjuvant chemotherapy for urothelial cancer. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM A: Patients receive cisplatin intravenously (IV) on day 1 and gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM B: Patients receive methotrexate IV on day 1, vinblastine IV, doxorubicin hydrochloride IV, cisplatin IV on day 2 and pegfilgrastim subcutaneously (SC) on day 3. Treatment repeats every 14 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 3 years.

Interventions

DRUGcisplatin

Given IV

DRUGgemcitabine hydrochloride

Given IV

DRUGmethotrexate

Given IV

DRUGvinblastine

Given IV

DRUGdoxorubicin hydrochloride

Given IV

BIOLOGICALpegfilgrastim

Given SC

OTHERlaboratory biomarker analysis

Correlative studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Southern California
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed high-grade urothelial carcinoma, stage T3bN0, T4N0 or any T stage with lymph node involvement, completely resected; including upper tract urothelial carcinoma * The dominant histology must be transitional cell or urothelial but foci of other histologies less than 20 percent of the total tumor volume are permitted * Absence of metastatic disease on radiographic imaging * Patients must be enrolled and able to start treatment within 90 days of radical cystectomy or radical nephrectomy * Creatinine less than institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) or clearance greater or equal to 50 mL/min (may be calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula or measured from 24-hour urine collection) * Serum total bilirubin less or equal to 1.5 x ULN (except for patients with Gilbert's) * Alkaline phosphatase less or equal to 2.5 x ULN * Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamic pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) less or equal to 2.5 x ULN * White blood cells (WBC) greater or equal to 3000 * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater or equal to 1500 * Hemoglobin (Hb) greater or equal to 9 * Platelets greater or equal to 100,000 * Normal left ventricular ejection fraction, by echocardiogram or multi gated acquisition scan (MUGA) * Patients must be recovered from surgery * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1 * Willing and able to provide informed consent * Willingness to use barrier contraception during study period

Exclusion criteria

* The presence of significant pleural effusion or ascites * Prior systemic chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (prior intravesical therapy is permitted) * History of malignancy within preceding 5 years, aside from non-melanoma skin cancer or previously treated or incidentally detected prostate cancer with undetectable PSA (after radical cystectomy or prostate cancer therapy) * Peripheral neuropathy greater than grade 1 * The presence of active heart disease such as congestive heart failure or unstable angina

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of unacceptable toxicity graded according to Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) v4.0Assessed up to 3 years80% confidence intervals (CI) will be constructed; for unacceptable toxicity, the confidence interval will be one-sided.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Disease-free survivalFrom radical cystectomy to the time cancer recurrence is detected by clinical findings or during surveillance imaging, at 3 years

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026