Skip to content

Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment

A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Retinal Detachment; Anatomical Success, Functional Success and Impact on Patient Quality of Life

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01639209
Enrollment
176
Registered
2012-07-12
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2017-05-31
Last updated
2019-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Keywords

Retinal detachment, Pneumatic retinopexy, Vitrectomy

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to compare the outcomes of pneumatic retinopexy with the outcomes of vitrectomy (with or without scleral buckle) for the management of retinal detachment, in terms of anatomical success, functional success and impact on patient quality of life.

Detailed description

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD)is an acute, sight threatening condition, with an incidence of approximately 10 per 100,000 population. Both of the treatments under investigation are widely used and accepted by vitreoretinal surgeons, but randomised, prospective comparison of the two techniques has not been reported in the scientific literature to date. Currently, the management decisions surrounding primary retinal detachment are grounded on a weak evidence base. The findings of this study will allow vitreoretinal surgeons and their patients to select the most appropriate intervention for that individual, in an informed and holistic manner.

Interventions

PROCEDUREVitrectomy

Pars plana vitrectomy plus laser/cryotherapy

Pneumatic retinopexy plus laser/cryotherapy

Sponsors

Unity Health Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients presenting with acute rhegmatogenous retinal detachment * Single retinal break OR group of breaks no larger than one clock hour (30°) * All break/s in detached retina between 8-4 o'clock * No significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy

Exclusion criteria

* Inferior breaks in detached retina * Inability to read English language * Age \< 18 years * Mental incapacity * Previous vitrectomy (index eye) * Previous retinal detachment (index eye) * Inability to maintain the post-operative posturing * Inability to carry out detailed examination of peripheral retina due to media opacity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual acuity12 months post intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual acuity1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post intervention
Subjective visual function3, 6 and 12 months post interventionQuestionnaire
Anatomical success (complete retinal re-attachment)3, 6 and 12 months post intervention
Subjective health related quality of lifeBaseline and 1 month post interventionQuestionnaire

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026