Skip to content

Acute Versus Subacute Angioplasty in Patients With NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Acute Versus Subacute Angioplasty in Patients With NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction=NONSTEMI Trial)

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01638806
Acronym
NONSTEMI
Enrollment
500
Registered
2012-07-12
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2017-04-30
Last updated
2019-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial infarction, Angioplasty, Prehospital emergency care, Biological markers, Troponin, Point-of-Care systems

Brief summary

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are categorized according to the electrocardiogram (ECG) findings into: 1) patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), 2) patients with Bundle Branch Block Myocardial Infarction (BBBMI), and 3) remaining patients with so-called NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NONSTEMI). Patients with STEMI or BBBMI are treated with acute angioplasty (PPCI=primary percutaneous coronary intervention), and the sooner PPCI is performed the lower is the mortality. This is why prehospital diagnosis and field-triage of patients with STEMI directly to heart centers with PPCI facilities is recommended. In patients with NONSTEMI previous trials have indicated that early angioplasty, within 72 hours of symptom onset, is associated with improved outcome when compared to late angioplasty or conservative therapy. No trials have so far been able to diagnose patients with NONSTEMI in the prehospital phase or immediately on arrival at a hospital, and triage them directly to PPCI. Implementation of point-of-care (POC) testing of biomarkers may enable prehospital or early inhospital establishment of the diagnosis NONSTEMI. The aim of the present trial is to identify patients with NONSTEMI in the prehospital phase or immediately on arrival at the local hospital based on a) symptoms, b) POC testing and c) ECG findings and then randomize patients to I) PPCI, or II) medical therapy and angiography/angioplasty within 72 hours (todays routine). Se below for detailed description

Detailed description

In the present trial patients with a) typical angina pectoris (AP) combined with b1) rise in biomarkers on POC testing (prehospital/immediately inhospital) and/or b2) ST-segment depression of more than 0.2 mV in two contiguous leads or more than 0.1 mV in four contiguous leads are randomized to I) PPCI (same protocol as in STEMI patients) or II) medical therapy and angiography/angioplasty within 72 hours (todays routine practice). The primary purposes of the present trial is threefold: 1. To evaluate if it is possible to diagnose patients with NONSTEMI in the prehospital phase or immediately on arrival at the hospital (N=250 patients) 2. To compare a combined endpoint of mortality, re-infarction (during index admission or readmitted), or readmission with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) between group I (PPCI strategy) and group II (routine strategy) (N=2500 patients). 3. To compare mortality between group I and II (N=4500 patients). Secondary purposes of the present trial is: 1. To evaluate whether there is difference in the primary endpoints in patients randomized within or after 12 hours of symptom onset. 2. To evaluate whether there is difference in the primary endpoints in patients randomized in the prehospital phase and on admission to the hospital, respectively. 3. To evaluate whether there is difference in the primary endpoints in patients with a final diagnosis of AMI, as adjudicated by a clinical event committee. 4. To evaluate whether there is difference in the primary endpoints in patients with or without diabetes, respectively. 5. To compare a combined endpoint of mortality, readmission with AMI, readmission with CHF, readmission with AP, revascularization (not planned on index admission). 6. To compare a combined safety endpoint of stroke or serious bleeding between group I and II. 7. To evaluate if there is difference in the frequency of PCI and CABG in group I versus II. 8. To compare total admission time between group I and II. 9. To compare total cost between group I and II. 10. To compare total duration where the patient is on sick leave between group I and II

Interventions

PROCEDUREGroup I: Primary PCI

Patients are treated with Aspirin, ADP-blocker and heparin and field-triaged or transferred immediately to an invasive center for PPCI

Sponsors

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Angina * Elevated biomarkers (Point-of-care testing) either prehospital or immediately on admission * ST-segment depression of 0.2mV or more in two contiguous leads or 0.1 mV or more in four contiguous leads. * Patient can be randomized either in the prehospital phase or within 30 minutes of admission to a hospital

Exclusion criteria

* Tachycardia \> 120 * Age \< 18 or \> 80 years * Indication for PPCI already fulfilled * Dementia * Patient cannot understand the study information * Presumed troponisme * Left ventricular hypertrophy * Known dialysis * Previous CABG * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortalitywithin 1 year from randomizationall-cause mortality
Re-infarctionwithin 1 year from randomizationRe-infarction (during index admission or readmitted) adjudicated by and endpoint committee. The endpoint committee is blinded to the initial randomization. The Universal definition of Myocadial infarction will be used to classify reinfarction. Biomarkers will be recorded with emphasis on the need of obtaining blood samples until a peak has been reached during index hospitaltization before reinfarction can be considered. Re-infarction will require a 20% relative rise in biomarker level.
Readmission with CHFwithin 1 year from randomizationReadmission or visit in the outpatient clinic with CHF. Readmission or visit with CHF needs to be adjudicated by an endpoint committee blinded to the initial randomization.
Confirmed AMIduring index admissionAn endpoint committee needs to evaluate whether each patient had AMI on the index admission. This evaluation is performed without the endpoint committee being aware whether the patient was randomized to PPCI or conventional therapy. The endpoint committee will classify whether the patient had: a) NONSTEMI, b) STEMI with symptom duration \<=12 hours, c) STEMI with symptom duration \>12 hours, d) BBBMI with symptom duration \<=12 hours or e) BBBMI with symptom duration \> 12 hours.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of index admissionTime from initial admission to dischargeThe national health registry is used to determine number of days the patietns was admitted during index hospitalization (local hospital and interventional hospital).
Sick-leave from workwithin 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomizationThe national DREAM database is used to determined whether the patient is on sick leave from work after index hospitalization and the duration of sick leave from work.
Cardiovascular mortalitywithin 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomizationCardiovascular mortality according to the Danish Registry of Cause of Death.
Bleedingwithin 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomizationThe national health registry is used to determine bleeding events. The same criteria for bleeding classification is used as in the PLATO trial (see NEJM 2009 for details) to categorize: 1) Major life-threatening bleeding, 2) Other major bleeding. In addition BARC type 4 (CABG-related) bleedings are registered.
Time to interventionTime from ambulance call to PCI or CABG is performed or angiography is performed without indication for PCI or CABGThe time frame is equal to the health care system delay (time from EMS call to intervention)
Total costwithin 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomizationThe total cost for each treatment strategy is calculated: EMS-transport, admission, cost for PCI / CABG.
Readmission with APwithin 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomizationThe national health registry is used to determine whether the patient is readmitted with AP. Time from index admission to first readmission with AP is determined. The endpoint committee adjudicate readmissions with AP blinded to original treatment strategy (Group I versus II)
Readmission with strokewithin 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomizationThe national health registry used to determine whether the patient is readmitted with stroke. Stroke was defined as focal loss of neurologic function caused by an ischemic or hemorrhagic event, with residual symptoms lasting at least 24 hours or leading to death. Time from index admission to first readmission with stroke is determined. The endpoint committee adjudicate readmissions with stroke blinded to original treatment strategy (Group I versus II).
Non-scheduled re-interventionwithin 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomizationThe national health registry is used to determine whether the patient has non-scheduled re-intervention performed (re-intervention not scheduled at index admission). Time from index admission to first re-intervention and type of re-interverntion (PCI or CABG) is determined. The endpoint committee adjudicate re-interventions blinded to original treatment strategy (Group I versus II)

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026