Skip to content

Comparison of Patient Perceived Pain and Satisfaction Between Lightweight and Heavyweight Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Comparison of Patient Perceived Pain and Satisfaction Between Lightweight and Heavyweight Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01638221
Enrollment
200
Registered
2012-07-11
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inguinal Hernia

Brief summary

This study will be comparing the patients overall satisfaction of two different meshes used in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.

Detailed description

This is a clinical trial comparing standard therapy in the use of either lightweight or heavy mesh for the repair of inguinal hernias. Both types of these meshes have been approved for surgical correction but subjective comparisons of patient overall satisfaction and perceived outcomes have not been measured. The investigators intend to measure certain subjective data in the form of a questionnaire will be issued to the patient preoperatively, one week, one month, six months, and one year after the surgery There is no recent literature comparing subjective data between two meshes called Ultra Pro and Surgi Pro. The biological effects of these meshes have identical properties as far as the healing process and inflammation as well as the low rate of infection. The main difference is the material that these meshes are composed of. The Ultra Pro is made of Prolene while the Surgi Pro is made of polypropylene. The risks are not increased anymore than that for normal surgical complications. They each have the same post operative risks including bleeding, infection and pain, but the investigators are investigating a possible subjective difference between these two separate meshes that are currently used.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Ascension Health
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* over the age of 18 * unilateral side to be repaired * no major abdominal surgery previously

Exclusion criteria

* under age 18 * bilateral repairs undertaken

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain1 yearSubjective pain scale rating post surgical

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
return to activities of daily living1 yearreturning to their presurgical lifestyle

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactAdam P Pentel, DO
apentel@hotmail.com402-720-5871

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026