Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolothotomy for Management of >3cm Renal Pelvis Stone

Status

Completed

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT01637337

Enrollment

Registered

2012-07-11

Start date

2012-05-31

Completion date

2013-01-31

Last updated

2016-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Pelvis Stone >3cm

Brief summary

To compare the outcome of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with \>3cm renal pelvis stone.

Interventions

PROCEDURElaparoscopic pyelolithotomy

laparoscopy

PROCEDUREpercutaneous nephrolithotomy

percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

16 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Adults with \>3cm renal pelvis stone

Exclusion criteria

* History of previous surgery on the target kidney * Active UTI * Coagulopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Stone free rate	at least 6 month after surgery

Countries

Iran

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026