Skip to content

Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Hemiparesis

Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Hemiparesis

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01636661
Acronym
tDCS
Enrollment
13
Registered
2012-07-10
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2015-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiparesis

Brief summary

The primary objective of this proposal is to investigate the safety of use of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)in children with hemiparesis. The research question, Is transcranial Direct Current Stimulation safe for use in children with congenital hemiparesis? relates to two hypotheses: 1. tDCS will not produce a major adverse event, including seizure activity. 2. No change in paretic or nonparetic hand function or cognitive status will occur.

Detailed description

Completing a pilot safety study is paramount to the future goal of incorporating the tDCS pediatric safety data and combining tDCS and rehabilitation with constraint-induced movement therapy in order to improve motor outcomes beyond what rehabilitation therapies alone can provide and enhance quality of life for these children with hemiparesis.

Interventions

DEVICEtDCS

transcranial direct current stimulation- non-invasive brain stimulation

Sponsors

Minnesota Medical Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Congenital Hemiparesis confirmed by most recent MRI or CT radiologic report. 2. Hemispheric Stroke or Periventricular Leukomalacia 3. Ages 8-17 years old 4. ≥ 10 degrees of active motion at the metacarpophalangeal joint 5. Adequate receptive language function to follow two-step commands as evidenced by performance on TOKEN test of intelligence 6. No evidence of seizure activity within the last 2 years. 7. Subject is able to give informed assent and providing a signature, along with the informed consent signature of the legal guardian as evidenced by signature.

Exclusion criteria

1. Metabolic Disorders 2. Neoplasm 3. Epilepsy 4. Disorders of Cellular Migration and Proliferation 5. Acquired Traumatic Brain Injury 6. Expressive Aphasia 7. Pregnancy 8. Indwelling metal or incompatible medical devices 9. Evidence of skin disease or skin abnormalities 10. Botulinum toxin or phenol intramuscular block within the one-month preceding tDCS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Events/Safety Assessment.Baseline, Posttest, Follow-Up Session at One-WeekAssessment of safety of use of tDCS in children with hemiparesis through vital signs, physician evaluation, subject report of symptoms. Reported are the number of participants who met the following criteria: 1. Vital Signs (either resting blood pressure or heart rate)- Any greater than 2SD of change in vital signs from pretest to posttest. 2. Physician Evaluation- Child identified as declining in function from pretest to posttest. 3. Subject Report of Symptoms- Reports of serious adverse event/symptoms from pretest to posttest. Detailed adverse events are reported in the adverse events module.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hand Function Decline as Measured by Number of ParticipantsBaseline, Posttest, Follow-Up Session at One-WeekMeasured by the Box and Blocks Test and Grip Strength

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

If a child did not exhibit a motor evoked potential from the ipsilesional cortex, they were excluded from the trial after enrollment but before assignment to a group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Receiving active tDCS tDCS: transcranial direct current stimulation- non-invasive brain stimulation
5
Sham tDCS
tDCS equipment set to placebo setting. tDCS: transcranial direct current stimulation- non-invasive brain stimulation
6
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham tDCSTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous16.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
10.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
14.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants5 participants11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 54 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Adverse Events/Safety Assessment.

Assessment of safety of use of tDCS in children with hemiparesis through vital signs, physician evaluation, subject report of symptoms. Reported are the number of participants who met the following criteria: 1. Vital Signs (either resting blood pressure or heart rate)- Any greater than 2SD of change in vital signs from pretest to posttest. 2. Physician Evaluation- Child identified as declining in function from pretest to posttest. 3. Subject Report of Symptoms- Reports of serious adverse event/symptoms from pretest to posttest. Detailed adverse events are reported in the adverse events module.

Time frame: Baseline, Posttest, Follow-Up Session at One-Week

Population: Pilot study therefore no sample size analysis. Completed per protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdverse Events/Safety Assessment.Any Change in Vital Signs0 Participants
Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdverse Events/Safety Assessment.Decline in Physician Evaluation0 Participants
Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdverse Events/Safety Assessment.Reported Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
Sham tDCSAdverse Events/Safety Assessment.Any Change in Vital Signs0 Participants
Sham tDCSAdverse Events/Safety Assessment.Decline in Physician Evaluation0 Participants
Sham tDCSAdverse Events/Safety Assessment.Reported Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
Secondary

Hand Function Decline as Measured by Number of Participants

Measured by the Box and Blocks Test and Grip Strength

Time frame: Baseline, Posttest, Follow-Up Session at One-Week

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Transcranial Direct Current StimulationHand Function Decline as Measured by Number of Participants0 participants
Sham tDCSHand Function Decline as Measured by Number of Participants0 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026