Skip to content

Out-of-Hospital Randomized Comparison of Video-assisted Endotracheal Intubation

Prospective, Randomized, Multicentre Evaluation of Different Video-assisted, for Emergency Use Designed Intubation Aids for Out-of-hospital Endotracheal Intubation. Comparison of C-MAC System PM (Karl Storz), AP Advance (Venner Medical), and King Vision (King Systems) at Four German HEMS.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01635660
Enrollment
182
Registered
2012-07-09
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2015-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management, Emergency Treatment, Intubation Intratracheal

Keywords

Out-of-hospital, airway management, intubation, video laryngoscope

Brief summary

This research project examines the effectiveness of different video laryngoscopes in a out-of-hospital emergency intubation. Since in preclinical airway management severe incidents with esophageal failures of intubation may partly happen or rather endotracheal Intubation may completely fail, it is of great importance to evaluate alternative ways of endotracheal intubation in out-of-hospital emergency medicine. Video laryngoscopy has been proven in everyday clinical practice and may clinically be superior in most situations when compared to endotracheal Intubation using a conventional laryngoscope. No data exist, if different video laryngoscope types perform differently in the out-of-hospital setting. The investigators hypothesize that there would be no difference with regard to intubation time, intubation success, and intubation morbidity between different models of video laryngoscopes.

Interventions

DEVICEIntubation

Tracheal Intubation with the assigned video laryngoscope

Sponsors

Karl Storz Endoscopy, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
King Systems Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
LMA, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Venner Medical, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- All adult emergency patients, age 18 years and older for whom a preclinical emergency intubation is necessary

Exclusion criteria

* Age under 18 years * Laryngoscopy according to the algorithm of airway management not being indicated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intubation successImmediately after intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Intubation on first attemptImmediately after intubation
Intubation timeImmediately after intubation

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026