Skip to content

Prostin and Propess in Induction of Labor

Induction of Labour: A Comparison Between Propess Vaginal Delivery System and Prostin E2 Vaginal Suppositories, A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01635439
Enrollment
200
Registered
2012-07-09
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2014-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of two agents used in induction of labor Propess (Controlled release dinoprostone, PGE2, pessary) and Prostin E2 (Dinoprostone vaginal Tablet).

Detailed description

A controlled release hydrophilic matrix (Controlled Therapeutics Ltd., East Kilbride, Scotland) which provides a gradual release of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) was introduced in 1995 (Propess, Ferring Pharmaceuticals). This preparation is used for the initiation or enhancement of cervical ripening in women at or after term with a singleton pregnancy and a cephalic presentation. Prostaglandin E2 causes softening and dilatation of the cervix and subsequently produces uterine contractions which may induce labour.

Interventions

DRUGPropess

The vaginal insert is removed 24 h after the application. It is only to be removed earlier in case of the onset of active labour, the rupture of the membranes, or at the occurrence of hyperstimulation.

DRUGProstin E2

3 mg tab is placed in the posterior vaginal fornix. dose can be repeated every 6 hours till onset of active labour, the rupture of the membranes, or the occurrence of hyper-stimulation.

Sponsors

North West Armed Forces Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Gestational age 37 weeks or more * Singleton pregnancy * Cephalic presentation.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous cesarean section * Any contraindication for vaginal delivery * Suspected Cephalo-Pelvic Disproportion * Unexplained antepartum Hemorrhage

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Induction to Delivery Interval24 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Induction to Onset of Labor Interval24 hours
Uterine Hyper-stimulation Rate24 hours
Need for Syntocinon Augmentation24 hours
Normal Vaginal Delivery Rate24 hours

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

290 women were assessed for eligibility, 62 women were excluded (35 did not meet the inclusion criteria, 21 declined to participate and 6 refused induction of labor as a method of delivery)

Pre-assignment details

Among the 228 women who met the eligibility criteria, 7 went into spontaneous labor and 4 had pathological Cardiotocography (CTG), so were excluded from being assigned to one of the treatment groups. After allocation 17 women were excluded from the analysis (15 refused to continue the induction of labor and had 5 incomplete records).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Propess
Propess insert is a preparation of PGE2 packaged in a hydrogel polymer matrix and designed for slow intravaginal release of 10 mg dinoprostone at a rate of 0.3 mg/h over 12 h.
100
Prostin E2
PROSTIN E2 Vaginal Suppository, an oxytocic, contains dinoprostone as the naturally occurring prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)3 mg/suppository.
100
Total200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProstin E2TotalPropess
Age, Continuous26.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
26.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
Body mass index23.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
23.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
23 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
Gestational age40.4 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
40.5 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
40.6 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Parity
P0
49 participants93 participants44 participants
Parity
P1
23 participants43 participants20 participants
Parity
P2
14 participants34 participants20 participants
Parity
P3
8 participants19 participants11 participants
Parity
P4
3 participants6 participants3 participants
Parity
P5
3 participants5 participants2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
100 Participants200 Participants100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 10013 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1002 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Induction to Delivery Interval

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PropessInduction to Delivery Interval22.3 hoursStandard Deviation 5.7
Prostin E2Induction to Delivery Interval21.2 hoursStandard Deviation 5.3
Secondary

Induction to Onset of Labor Interval

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PropessInduction to Onset of Labor Interval18.8 hoursStandard Deviation 5.3
Prostin E2Induction to Onset of Labor Interval17.7 hoursStandard Deviation 5.4
Secondary

Need for Syntocinon Augmentation

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PropessNeed for Syntocinon Augmentation5 participants
Prostin E2Need for Syntocinon Augmentation10 participants
Secondary

Normal Vaginal Delivery Rate

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PropessNormal Vaginal Delivery Rate79 participants
Prostin E2Normal Vaginal Delivery Rate85 participants
Secondary

Uterine Hyper-stimulation Rate

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PropessUterine Hyper-stimulation Rate1 participants
Prostin E2Uterine Hyper-stimulation Rate1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026