Chronic Liver Disease
Conditions
Keywords
chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, vitamin A, RDR test, retinol-binding protein
Brief summary
The relative-dose-response test (RDR) is considered to be the most accurate method for evaluating vitamin A nutritional status (VANS) in patients suffering from liver disease, as it infers the reserves of the vitamin in the liver. However, for the RDR test to reflect VANS in patients suffering from chronic liver disease, factors inherent to the disease need to be considered, such as possible malabsorption, advanced age, a drop in synthesis and/or the release of retinol binding protein (RBP), which would result in an inadequate response to the RDR test. Thus, the objective of present study is to assess the adequacy of two different protocol for using the RDR test in patients with cirrhosis and cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: The sample group was comprised of 178 patients at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro University Hospital (111 men) with several etiologies of liver cirrhosis at different stages in the progression of the disease. They were sorted into two groups, according to the retinyl palmitate dosage (1500 IU or 2500 IU) received at T0 (blood sample taken following a 12-hour fast). Following supplementation, the investigators took further blood samples five and seven hours later (T5 and T7). The investigators assessed VANS via concentrations of serum retinol and RBP, as well as by way of the RDR test. The cutoff points the investigators used for denoting inadequacy in the indicators retinol and RDR were, respectively, \< 1.05 µmol/L and ≥ 20%. To classify the degrees of severity of the disease the investigators used the criteria established by Child & Pugh (1973).
Interventions
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTretinyl palmitate (UNICEF, Melbourne, Australia)
the patients received an oral dose of 1500 IU or 2500 IU, once.
Sponsors
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* diagnosis of liver cirrhosis of viral etiology, alcoholic or metabolic action
Exclusion criteria
* malabsorption syndromes * moderate or severe infection * diabetes mellitus using insulin renal, cardiac or respiratory * therapeutic doses of vitamin A in the 6 months prior to data collection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Baseline in retinol status (RDR test) at 5 and/or 7 hour after supplementation | RDR will be calculated for the two intervention groups (1500 or 2500 IU vitamin A), for the two moments of blood sampling, 5 and 7 hours after supplementation. | Therapeutic response is evaluated by means of circulating serum retinol, 5 and 7 hours after the administration of vitamin A. The RDR was calculated by the following formula, using the values of serum retinol in the three times of blood collection (Loerch et al., 1979), expressed in percentages: RDR (%) = \[(A0-Ax) / Ax\] x100 where A0 is the serum retinol at time 0 (fasting) and Ax is the serum retinol 5 or 7 h after administration of vitamin A. It was used as the RDR cutoff ≥ 20%, indicating indirect hepatic reserve inadequate |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| serum retinol-binding protein (RBP) | RBP were analyzed at baseline, 5 and 7 hours after supplementation as a variable that explain the appropriate response or failure to respond to the RDR test. |
Countries
Brazil
Outcome results
None listed