Skip to content

Drawing the Line Between Medium Care and Intensive Care. A Prospective Observational Study Based on the Nursing Activities Score

Drawing the Line Between Medium Care and Intensive Care. A Prospective Observational Study Based on the Nursing Activities Score

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01633606
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2012-07-04
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2014-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Keywords

severity of illness, scoring, medium care, intensive care, staffing

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to develop a screening instrument, based on the nursing activities score, by which we can distinguish medium care patients from the intensive care patients in terms of nurse staffing. The main study question is: What is the most discriminative NAS cut off for medium care patient? Each nursing shift the NAS and TISS 28 scores will be calculated for each patient who is admitted to the 8 participating units. Nurses will be asked to answer 3 questions (see detailed description here under)at the end of their working shift concerning each patient appointed to them. Each morning medical staff and head nurses will be asked 2 questions (see detailed description here under) for concerning patient admitted to there ward. In order to determine the NAS cut off for medium care patient, all morning questionnaire scores will be compared to the NAS an TISS28 scores of that same morning. Secondary study questions are: * Can NAS score based on one nursing shift predict the severity of care in the subsequent nursing shift? * Is there a difference in appreciation of severity of care between nurses, head nurses and medical staff? * Which variables influence the perception of severity of care? * How does NAS relate to TISS28, APACHE and NEMS?

Detailed description

Nursing questionnaire: 1. How many beds were appointed to you? 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4. 4 5. 5 6. 6 2. For how many of such patients you could care for maximally? 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4. 4 5. \>4 3. This patients' burden of care corresponds to: 1. An intensive care patient who requires more than standard intensive care 2. An intensive care patient who requires standard intensive care 3. A medium care patient medical staff and head nurse questionaire: 1. For how many of such patients you could care for maximally? 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4. 4 5. \>4 2. This patients' burden of care corresponds to? 1. An intensive care patient who requires more than standard intensive care 2. An intensive care patient who requires standard intensive care 3. A medium care patient

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* admission to one of the 9 critical area's

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
most discriminative NAS cut off for identifying medium care patient versus intensive care patient1 year

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026