Skip to content

Water Exchange Versus Carbon Dioxide for Colonoscopy

Water Exchange Versus Carbon Dioxide Insufflation to Improve Colonoscopy Screening - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01633333
Enrollment
473
Registered
2012-07-04
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2014-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Adenomas, Colorectal Polyps, Pain

Keywords

Colonoscopy, Colorectal cancer, Colorectal adenomas, Pain

Brief summary

Colonoscopy is commonly used in screening for colorectal cancer. A refined technique of colonoscopy involving the use of water as the sole modality to aid colonoscope insertion, water exchange, has been described in recent research papers to decrease patient discomfort and pain, and to reduce the need for sedation during colonoscopy when compared with standard air insufflation. Carbon dioxide insufflation has been described to decrease patient discomfort after colonoscopy. No randomized trial has so far compared the use of water exchange to carbon dioxide insufflation. Our hypothesis is that water exchange inflicts less discomfort to patients undergoing colonoscopy than carbon dioxide insufflation. Patients undergoing screening colonoscopy in two centers in Norway, one center in Poland and one center in The Netherlands will be enrolled and randomized to examination of either of the two methods.

Detailed description

Single blinded randomized controlled trial.

Interventions

Water is infused and suctioned in a systematic fashion to obtain luminal view and for cleansing of the colon to facilitate colonoscope insertion. The carbon dioxide pump is turned off, only to be turned on during withdrawal from the cecum.

Carbon dioxide insufflation to obtain luminal view to facilitate colonoscope insertion, considered to be standard procedure.

Sponsors

South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
CollaboratorOTHER
Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology
CollaboratorOTHER
Erasmus Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Sorlandet Hospital HF
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for screening or polyp surveillance colonoscopy * Patients accepting sedation on demand

Exclusion criteria

* Demand for sedation/analgesia before the start of the procedure * Previous partial or total colonic resection * Pregnancy * Unwilling/unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain during colonoscopy1 hourPatients will be asked by a blinded assistant immediately after colonoscopy to score pain during the procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cecal intubation rate1 hourCecal intubation rate is defined as successful completion of colonoscopy insertion. This will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis according to group allocation.
Cecal intubation time1 hourThe time taken to complete insertion of the colonoscope.
Pain during colonoscopy30 minutesPatients will be asked to report pain during colonoscopy to an unblinded study assistant.
Polyp detection rate1 hourDetection of any colonic polyp, irrespective of histologic type, during each procedure.
Dose of medication1 hourDose of sedative and analgesic medication needed to complete the colonoscopy.
Adenoma detection rate1 hourDetection of adenomas during each colonoscopy procedure

Countries

Norway, Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026