Skip to content

A Phase III Study of BKM120 With Fulvestrant in Patients With HR+,HER2-, AI Treated, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Progressed on or After mTORi

A Phase III Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of BKM120 With Fulvestrant, in Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-positive HER2-negative AI Treated, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Progressed on or After mTOR Inhibitor Based Treatment

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01633060
Acronym
BELLE-3
Enrollment
432
Registered
2012-07-04
Start date
2012-10-03
Completion date
2017-09-21
Last updated
2019-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Breast Cancer

Keywords

BKM120, fulvestrant, breast cancer, metastatic, locally advanced, AI treated, mTOR inhibitor, PI3K, PIK3CA, PTEN, HER2-, HR+

Brief summary

This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of treatment with Buparlisib plus Fulvestrant vs. Placebo plus Fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone Receptor-positive (HR-positive), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-negative), aromatase inhibitor (AI)-treated, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer whose disease progressed on or after mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi)-based treatment. Patients were randomized in 2:1 ratio to treatment with buparlisib 100 mg daily in combination with fulvestrant 500 mg or placebo daily in combination with fulvestrant 500 mg. Randomization was stratified according to visceral disease status (present or absent).

Detailed description

Novartis decided not to pursue further development of buparlisib program. On 19 Dec 2016, Novartis notified the Investigators about this decision; accordingly the CBKM120F2303 study was terminated.

Interventions

DRUGFulvestrant

Intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg (Day 1 and Day 15 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of every cycle thereafter)

DRUGBKM120

BKM120 100 mg once daily

BKM120 matching placebo, once daily

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key inclusion criteria * Female patients age 18 years or older * Histologically and/or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer * Radiologic evidence of inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer * Adequate tumor tissue for the analysis of PI3K-related biomarkers * Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) negative disease, and a known positive hormone receptor status * Postmenopausal women * Prior treatment with aromatase inhibitors * Evidence of progression to the combination of mTORi and endocrine therapy given as the last therapy prior to study entry * Adequate bone marrow and organ function * ECOG performance status ≤ 2 Key

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment with PI3K inhibitors, protein kinase B inhibitors or fulvestrant * More than one chemotherapy line for metastatic disease * Hypersensitivity to any of the excipients of buparlisib or fulvestrant * Symptomatic central nervous system metastases * Concurrent malignancy or malignancy within 3 years of study enrollment * Certain drugs or radiation within 2-4 weeks of enrollment * Increasing or chronic treatment (\>5 days) with corticosteroids or another immunosuppressive agent * Certain scores on an anxiety and depression mood questionnaire given at screening * Acute viral hepatitis or a history of chronic or active hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus * Active cardiac disease or a history of cardiac dysfunction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Local Investigator Assessment - Full Analysis Set (FAS)Every 6 weeks after randomization up to a maximum of 4 yearsProgression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient did not progress or die at the time of the analysis data cut-off or start of new antineoplastic therapy, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment before the earliest of the cut-off date or the start date of additional anti-neoplastic therapy. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria RECIST v1.1, as 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline and/or unequivocal progression of the non-target lesions and/or appearance of a new lesion. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Patients were followed up for approximately every 6 weeks after randomization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusEvery 6 weeks after randomization up to a maximum of 5 yearsProgression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient did not progress or die at the time of the analysis data cut-off or start of new antineoplastic therapy, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment before the earliest of the cut-off date or the start date of additional anti-neoplastic therapy. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria RECIST v1.1, as 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline and/or unequivocal progression of the non-target lesions and/or appearance of a new lesion. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Patients were followed up for approximately every 6 weeks after randomization.
Overall Survival (OS) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusEvery 6 weeks after randomization up to a maximum of 5 yearsOverall Survival (OS) by PIK3CA mutational status based on ctDNA is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a patient was not known to have died by the date of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last known date patient alive. Patients were followed up approximately every 6 weeks after randomization and every 3 months during survival follow-up.
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusEvery 6 weeks after randomization up to a maximum of 5 yearsOverall Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to RECIST 1.1. ORR was analyzed in the full population and by PIK3CA mutational status based on ctDNA. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) for target/non target lesions: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target/non target lesions (all lymph nodes assigned as non-target lesions must be non-pathological in size (\< 10 mm short axis)); Partial response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions ; Overall Response (OR)= CR+PR. Patients were followed up for the duration of the study and for approximately every 6 weeks after randomization.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusWeek 14, Week 24Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) is defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) or Non-CR/non-PD lasting more than 14 or 24 weeks based on local investigator's assessment according to RECIST 1.1. CBR was analyzed in the full population and by PIK3CA mutational status based on ctDNA. Patients were followed up for the duration of the study and approximately every 6 weeks after randomization.
Overall Survival (OS) - Full Analysis Set (FAS)Every 6 weeks after randomization up to a maximum of 5 yearsOverall Survival (OS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a patient was not known to have died by the date of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last known date patient alive. Patients were followed up approximately every 6 weeks after randomization and every 3 months during survival follow-up.
Plasma Concentration-time Profiles of BKM120 in Combination With Fulvestrant at Cycle 1 Day 1 - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS)C1D1 1 hour post dose, C1D1 2 hour post dose, C1D1 6 hour post dose and C1D1 9 hour post dosePlasma samples were collected from the first 100 BKM120-treated patients on Cycle 1 Day 1 (at 1h, 2h, and 6h post-dose and a recommended 9h post-dose sample).
Predose Trough Concentration-time Profile of BKM120 in Combination With Fulvestrant Over Time - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS)C1D15, C2D1, C3D1 and C4D1Pre-dose samples were collected for trough concentrations at Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1.
Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL):Time to 10% Definitive Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Per EORTC-QLQ-C30 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)Baseline, Week 6 (C2D15), Week 12 (C4D1), then every 8 weeks until discontinuation (a cycle [C] = 4 weeks) up to 5 years.The global health status/QoL scale score of the QLQ-C30 is identified as the primary PRO variable of interest. Physical Functioning (PF), Emotional Functioning (EF) and Social Functioning (SF) scale scores of the QLQ-C30. The time to definitive 10% deterioration is defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of an event, which is defined as a worsening (decrease) in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study or death due to any cause. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high /healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of ECOG Performance Status From Baseline - Full Analysis Set (FAS)Screening, Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) and then at day 1 of each cycle and at the EOT visitThe Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status is a scale used to assess how a patient's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the patient, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. The ECOG Performance Scores has 5 grades: 0 = fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1 = restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work, 2 = ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3 = capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours, 4 = completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair and 5 = dead. Definitive deterioration is defined as no improvement in the ECOG status following observation of the deterioration.
Long-term Safety and Tolerability in the Two Treatment Arms - Safety Set (SS)From first dose of study treatment to 30 days after last dose of study treatment, up to 5 yearsAnalysis of frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths.

Countries

Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Lebanon, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 201 centers in 22 countries worldwide (Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Republic of Korea, Lebanon, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, UK and USA).

Pre-assignment details

At least 420 patients were planned to be enrolled, randomized in a 2:1 ratio (two buparlisib, one placebo). A total of 432 patients were actually enrolled and analyzed (buparlisib arm: N=289; placebo arm: N=143). Not completed: in Randomization Phase=Randomized and not Treated; in Treatment Phase=Discontinued study treatment per Protocol.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BKM120 100mg + Fulvestrant
BKM120 100 mg per day and fulvestrant given until progression or as described in the protocol.
289
Placebo + Fulvestrant
BKM120 matching placebo daily and fulvestrant given until progression or as described in the protocol.
143
Total432

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Post-Treatment Efficacy Follow-Up PhaseAdverse Event20
Post-Treatment Efficacy Follow-Up PhaseDeath10
Post-Treatment Efficacy Follow-Up PhasePhysician Decision10
Post-Treatment Efficacy Follow-Up PhaseProgressive Disease101
Post-Treatment Efficacy Follow-Up PhaseStudy terminated by sponsor10
Post-Treatment Efficacy Follow-Up PhaseSubject/Guardian Decision11
Randomization PhaseProtocol deviation12
Randomization PhaseTechnical problem01
Treatment PhaseAdverse Event243
Treatment PhaseDeath43
Treatment PhaseLost to Follow-up10
Treatment PhasePhysician Decision167
Treatment PhaseProgressive Disease210120
Treatment PhaseProtocol Deviation10
Treatment PhaseStudy Terminated by sponsor73
Treatment PhaseSubject/guardian decision254

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo + FulvestrantTotalBKM120 100mg + Fulvestrant
Age, Continuous61.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.23
60.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.59
60.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.76
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
9 Participants29 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants20 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
121 Participants370 Participants249 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
143 Participants432 Participants289 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
123 / 28868 / 140191 / 428
other
Total, other adverse events
271 / 288113 / 140384 / 428
serious
Total, serious adverse events
74 / 28826 / 140100 / 428

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Local Investigator Assessment - Full Analysis Set (FAS)

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient did not progress or die at the time of the analysis data cut-off or start of new antineoplastic therapy, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment before the earliest of the cut-off date or the start date of additional anti-neoplastic therapy. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria RECIST v1.1, as 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline and/or unequivocal progression of the non-target lesions and/or appearance of a new lesion. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Patients were followed up for approximately every 6 weeks after randomization.

Time frame: Every 6 weeks after randomization up to a maximum of 4 years

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) based on Primary Analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantProgression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Local Investigator Assessment - Full Analysis Set (FAS)3.9 Months
Placebo + FulvestrantProgression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Local Investigator Assessment - Full Analysis Set (FAS)1.8 Months
p-value: <0.001Log Rank
Secondary

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational Status

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) is defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) or Non-CR/non-PD lasting more than 14 or 24 weeks based on local investigator's assessment according to RECIST 1.1. CBR was analyzed in the full population and by PIK3CA mutational status based on ctDNA. Patients were followed up for the duration of the study and approximately every 6 weeks after randomization.

Time frame: Week 14, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), Full Analysis Set (FAS) -ctDNA PIK3CA mutant, Full Analysis Set (FAS) - ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant based on Primary Analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusCBR>=14wks(FAS)33.2 Percentage of Participants
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusCBR>=24wks(FAS)24.6 Percentage of Participants
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusCBR>=14wks(FAS ctDNA PIK3CA mutant)38.0 Percentage of Participants
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusCBR>=24wks(FAS ctDNA PIK3CA mutant)30.0 Percentage of Participants
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusCBR>=14wks(FAS ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant)36.4 Percentage of Participants
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusCBR>= 24wks(FAS ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant)25.8 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + FulvestrantClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusCBR>=14wks(FAS ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant)21.0 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + FulvestrantClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusCBR>=14wks(FAS)20.3 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + FulvestrantClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusCBR>=24wks(FAS ctDNA PIK3CA mutant)11.4 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + FulvestrantClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusCBR>=24wks(FAS)15.4 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + FulvestrantClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusCBR>= 24wks(FAS ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant)14.8 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + FulvestrantClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusCBR>=14wks(FAS ctDNA PIK3CA mutant)14.3 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL):Time to 10% Definitive Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Per EORTC-QLQ-C30 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)

The global health status/QoL scale score of the QLQ-C30 is identified as the primary PRO variable of interest. Physical Functioning (PF), Emotional Functioning (EF) and Social Functioning (SF) scale scores of the QLQ-C30. The time to definitive 10% deterioration is defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of an event, which is defined as a worsening (decrease) in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study or death due to any cause. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high /healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 (C2D15), Week 12 (C4D1), then every 8 weeks until discontinuation (a cycle [C] = 4 weeks) up to 5 years.

Population: Full Analysis (FAS) based on Primary Analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantHealth-related Quality of Life (HRQoL):Time to 10% Definitive Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Per EORTC-QLQ-C30 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)EORTC QLQ-30 - Global QoL score5.3 Months
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantHealth-related Quality of Life (HRQoL):Time to 10% Definitive Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Per EORTC-QLQ-C30 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)EORTC QLQ-30 - PF scale score11.8 Months
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantHealth-related Quality of Life (HRQoL):Time to 10% Definitive Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Per EORTC-QLQ-C30 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)EORTC QLQ-30 - EF scale score10.0 Months
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantHealth-related Quality of Life (HRQoL):Time to 10% Definitive Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Per EORTC-QLQ-C30 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)EORTC QLQ-30 - SF scale score10.0 Months
Placebo + FulvestrantHealth-related Quality of Life (HRQoL):Time to 10% Definitive Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Per EORTC-QLQ-C30 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)EORTC QLQ-30 - SF scale score11.5 Months
Placebo + FulvestrantHealth-related Quality of Life (HRQoL):Time to 10% Definitive Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Per EORTC-QLQ-C30 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)EORTC QLQ-30 - Global QoL score6.3 Months
Placebo + FulvestrantHealth-related Quality of Life (HRQoL):Time to 10% Definitive Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Per EORTC-QLQ-C30 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)EORTC QLQ-30 - EF scale score10.0 Months
Placebo + FulvestrantHealth-related Quality of Life (HRQoL):Time to 10% Definitive Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Per EORTC-QLQ-C30 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)EORTC QLQ-30 - PF scale score10.1 Months
Secondary

Long-term Safety and Tolerability in the Two Treatment Arms - Safety Set (SS)

Analysis of frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to 30 days after last dose of study treatment, up to 5 years

Population: Safety Set (SS) based on Final Analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantLong-term Safety and Tolerability in the Two Treatment Arms - Safety Set (SS)SAEs25.7 Percentage of Participants
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantLong-term Safety and Tolerability in the Two Treatment Arms - Safety Set (SS)Deaths42.7 Percentage of Participants
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantLong-term Safety and Tolerability in the Two Treatment Arms - Safety Set (SS)AEs97.9 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + FulvestrantLong-term Safety and Tolerability in the Two Treatment Arms - Safety Set (SS)SAEs18.6 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + FulvestrantLong-term Safety and Tolerability in the Two Treatment Arms - Safety Set (SS)Deaths48.6 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + FulvestrantLong-term Safety and Tolerability in the Two Treatment Arms - Safety Set (SS)AEs92.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) by PIK3CA Mutational Status

Overall Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to RECIST 1.1. ORR was analyzed in the full population and by PIK3CA mutational status based on ctDNA. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) for target/non target lesions: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target/non target lesions (all lymph nodes assigned as non-target lesions must be non-pathological in size (\< 10 mm short axis)); Partial response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions ; Overall Response (OR)= CR+PR. Patients were followed up for the duration of the study and for approximately every 6 weeks after randomization.

Time frame: Every 6 weeks after randomization up to a maximum of 5 years

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), Full Analysis Set (FAS) -ctDNA PIK3CA mutant, Full Analysis Set (FAS) - ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant based on Primary Analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantOverall Response Rate (ORR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFull Analysis Set (FAS)7.6 Percentage of Participants
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantOverall Response Rate (ORR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFAS ctDNA PIK3CA mutant10.0 Percentage of Participants
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantOverall Response Rate (ORR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFAS ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant7.6 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + FulvestrantOverall Response Rate (ORR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFull Analysis Set (FAS)2.1 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + FulvestrantOverall Response Rate (ORR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFAS ctDNA PIK3CA mutant0 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + FulvestrantOverall Response Rate (ORR) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFAS ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant3.7 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) by PIK3CA Mutational Status

Overall Survival (OS) by PIK3CA mutational status based on ctDNA is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a patient was not known to have died by the date of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last known date patient alive. Patients were followed up approximately every 6 weeks after randomization and every 3 months during survival follow-up.

Time frame: Every 6 weeks after randomization up to a maximum of 5 years

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) -ctDNA PIK3CA mutant, Full Analysis Set (FAS) - ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant based on Primary Analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantOverall Survival (OS) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFAS ctDNA PIK3CA mutant21.8 Months
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantOverall Survival (OS) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFAS ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant21.4 Months
Placebo + FulvestrantOverall Survival (OS) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFAS ctDNA PIK3CA mutantNA Months
Placebo + FulvestrantOverall Survival (OS) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFAS ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant21.4 Months
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) - Full Analysis Set (FAS)

Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a patient was not known to have died by the date of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last known date patient alive. Patients were followed up approximately every 6 weeks after randomization and every 3 months during survival follow-up.

Time frame: Every 6 weeks after randomization up to a maximum of 5 years

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) based on Primary Analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantOverall Survival (OS) - Full Analysis Set (FAS)21.2 Months
Placebo + FulvestrantOverall Survival (OS) - Full Analysis Set (FAS)22.1 Months
Secondary

Plasma Concentration-time Profiles of BKM120 in Combination With Fulvestrant at Cycle 1 Day 1 - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS)

Plasma samples were collected from the first 100 BKM120-treated patients on Cycle 1 Day 1 (at 1h, 2h, and 6h post-dose and a recommended 9h post-dose sample).

Time frame: C1D1 1 hour post dose, C1D1 2 hour post dose, C1D1 6 hour post dose and C1D1 9 hour post dose

Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS) based on Primary Analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantPlasma Concentration-time Profiles of BKM120 in Combination With Fulvestrant at Cycle 1 Day 1 - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS)C1D1 - 1 hour post dose425.178 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 149.6
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantPlasma Concentration-time Profiles of BKM120 in Combination With Fulvestrant at Cycle 1 Day 1 - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS)C1D1 - 2 hour post dose615.441 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 70.9
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantPlasma Concentration-time Profiles of BKM120 in Combination With Fulvestrant at Cycle 1 Day 1 - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS)C1D1 - 6 hour post dose314.094 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.9
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantPlasma Concentration-time Profiles of BKM120 in Combination With Fulvestrant at Cycle 1 Day 1 - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS)C1D1 - 9 hour post dose302.899 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 58.3
Secondary

Predose Trough Concentration-time Profile of BKM120 in Combination With Fulvestrant Over Time - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS)

Pre-dose samples were collected for trough concentrations at Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1.

Time frame: C1D15, C2D1, C3D1 and C4D1

Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS) based on Primary Analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantPredose Trough Concentration-time Profile of BKM120 in Combination With Fulvestrant Over Time - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS)C1D15939.978 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.8
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantPredose Trough Concentration-time Profile of BKM120 in Combination With Fulvestrant Over Time - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS)C2D1880.074 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.4
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantPredose Trough Concentration-time Profile of BKM120 in Combination With Fulvestrant Over Time - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS)C3D1777.026 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 131
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantPredose Trough Concentration-time Profile of BKM120 in Combination With Fulvestrant Over Time - Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS)C4D11088.074 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) by PIK3CA Mutational Status

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient did not progress or die at the time of the analysis data cut-off or start of new antineoplastic therapy, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment before the earliest of the cut-off date or the start date of additional anti-neoplastic therapy. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria RECIST v1.1, as 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline and/or unequivocal progression of the non-target lesions and/or appearance of a new lesion. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Patients were followed up for approximately every 6 weeks after randomization.

Time frame: Every 6 weeks after randomization up to a maximum of 5 years

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) -ctDNA PIK3CA mutant, Full Analysis Set (FAS) - ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant based on Primary Analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantProgression Free Survival (PFS) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFAS ctDNA PIK3CA mutant4.2 Months
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantProgression Free Survival (PFS) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFAS ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant3.9 Months
Placebo + FulvestrantProgression Free Survival (PFS) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFAS ctDNA PIK3CA mutant1.6 Months
Placebo + FulvestrantProgression Free Survival (PFS) by PIK3CA Mutational StatusFAS ctDNA PIK3CA non-mutant2.7 Months
Secondary

Time to Definitive Deterioration of ECOG Performance Status From Baseline - Full Analysis Set (FAS)

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status is a scale used to assess how a patient's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the patient, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. The ECOG Performance Scores has 5 grades: 0 = fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1 = restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work, 2 = ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3 = capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours, 4 = completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair and 5 = dead. Definitive deterioration is defined as no improvement in the ECOG status following observation of the deterioration.

Time frame: Screening, Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) and then at day 1 of each cycle and at the EOT visit

Population: Full Analysis (FAS) based on Primary Analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BKM120 100mg + FulvestrantTime to Definitive Deterioration of ECOG Performance Status From Baseline - Full Analysis Set (FAS)18.3 Months
Placebo + FulvestrantTime to Definitive Deterioration of ECOG Performance Status From Baseline - Full Analysis Set (FAS)12.0 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026