Skip to content

Medical Economics of Urinary PCA3 Test for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Medical Economics of Urinary PCA3 Test for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01632930
Enrollment
962
Registered
2012-07-03
Start date
2012-07-02
Completion date
2021-04-26
Last updated
2022-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients Scheduled for Prostate Biopsy Because of Increased Serum PSA and/or Abnormal Digital Rectal Examination

Keywords

diagnosis, prostate cancer, urine, medical economics

Brief summary

The ultrasound-guided biopsies of the prostate is the validated technique for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, the first human cancer and second leading cause of cancer death. Overall, in more than half of cases, prostate biopsies performed in search of a prostate cancer are negative. In this population, there is no consensus recommendation on how to care, leading to repeated invasive biopsies, potential sources of complications. The PCA3 urine test (ProgensaTM, GenProbe) is an innovative diagnostic tool to predict the positivity of prostate biopsies, especially in patients who had at least one negative biopsy. Proposed in clinical practice in France as a commercial kit, it is expensive and is not covered by health insurance. It is therefore essential to assess the medical and economic impact of its introduction into medical practice. The investigators propose to set up a study of high standard of proof, multicenter, based on recruitment of patients treated in hospitals. This working hypothesis is that the availability of the PCA3 test results would reduce the number of invasive biopsies performed incorrectly in patients already had at least one negative biopsy, thus improving the diagnostic strategy of prostate cancer.

Interventions

OTHERurinary PCA3 test using Progensa® PCA3 assay kit (Gen-Probe)

urinary PCA3 test will be performed in patients before they undergo prostate biopsy for increased serum PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. Patients with negative biopsies will be definitively enrolled in the study. The physician in charge will have knowledge of PCA3 test results and will be asked to determine the subsequent follow-up taking these results into account.

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Months to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients ≥ 18 year-old * patients who undergo prostate biopsy for increased serum PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal examination * patients who gave informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* no informed consent * medical history of or current significant prostate cancer * medical history of or current extra-prostatic cancer * high risk of loss of follow-up * clinically obvious prostate cancer (clinical stage ≥ T3, PSA ≥ 50 ng/ml, lymph node involvement, osteolytic bone metastases)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients who inappropriately underwent prostate biopsies (negative biopsy: no cancer) at end point24 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Medical impact of availability of PCA3 test results12 monthsTo determine whether availability of PCA3 test results influences patient management in terms of physical examinations, , PSA testing, prostate ultrasonography, prostate MRI and delay in performing these tests
Diagnostic performances of urinary PCA3 test12, 24 and 60 monthsIntrinsic performances of PCA3 test in predicting prostate biopsy results in term of sensitivity, specificity and area under ROC curves
Cost-efficiency study24 monthsTo determine how availability of PCA3 test results alters medical economics when managing patients with prostate cancer suspicion

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026