Skip to content

Randomized Switch Study From Hydroxyurea to Ruxolitinib for RELIEF of Polycythemia Vera Symptoms: The Relief Study

Polycythemia Vera Symptom Study Evaluating Ruxolitinib Versus Hydroxyurea in a Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of Patient Reported Outcomes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01632904
Enrollment
110
Registered
2012-07-03
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2017-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Polycythemia Vera

Keywords

Polycythemia Vera, PV

Brief summary

The purpose of the RELIEF study is to compare symptoms in polycythemia vera (PV) subjects treated with ruxolitinib versus subjects treated with hydroxyurea (HU) as measured by the percent of subjects who achieve a clinically meaningful symptom improvement (ie, total symptom score reduction of ≥ 50% reduction) at Week 16 compared to Baseline. The study is also designed to demonstrate that these responses are durable with continued treatment.

Detailed description

This is a Phase 3 multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized study. Only subjects with PV who have received HU for at least 12 weeks, have been receiving a stable dose before screening, and still have symptoms related to PV will be enrolled. Subjects will be randomized (1:1) to 1 of 2 treatment arms: A: ruxolitinib and HU-placebo B: HU and ruxolitinib-placebo Subjects randomized to either arm may be eligible to transition to open-label ruxolitinib after Week 16.

Interventions

DRUGRuxolitinib

Ruxolitinib will be orally self-administered at a starting dose of 10 mg (two 5 mg tablets) twice a day. Dose increases of 5 mg (1 tablet) in twice-daily increments are permitted after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy for subjects who meet prespecified criteria for inadequate efficacy.

Hydroxyurea (500 mg capsules) will be orally self-administered at the dose that the subject was receiving previously. The dose may be increased after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy to optimize efficacy for subjects meeting prespecified criteria.

DRUGHU-placebo

All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose. When adjustments are made to the ruxolitinib dose, the dose of HU-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.

DRUGRuxolitinib-placebo

All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose. When adjustments are made to the HU dose, the dose of ruxolitinib-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.

Sponsors

Incyte Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must currently be reporting symptoms while on a stable dose of HU monotherapy and be eligible to continue HU on study after randomization. * Before screening, the subject must have been receiving HU for at least 12 weeks AND be receiving a stable dose. * Subjects must meet baseline symptom criteria * Subjects should meet at least 1 of the following criteria: * No more than 2 phlebotomies within the 6 months before screening OR * No palpable splenomegaly. * Subjects must have a hematocrit that can be controlled within 35% to 48% (inclusive) before randomization.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with inadequate liver or renal function at screening. * Subjects with clinically significant infection that requires therapy * Subjects with known active hepatitis A, B, or C at screening or with known HIV positivity. * Subjects with an active malignancy over the previous 2 years * Subjects with clinically significant cardiac disease (Class III or IV).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects Achieving a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine (TSS-C) at Week 16, as Measured by the Modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) DiaryFrom Baseline to Week 16Symptoms of polycythemia vera were assessed using a modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) electronic diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): tiredness, itching, muscle aches, night sweats, and sweats while awake. The total symptom score ranged from 0-50 and was calculated as the sum of the 5 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16From Baseline to Week 16The TSS-C cluster includes tiredness, itching, muscle aches, night sweats, and sweats while awake.
Proportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48Week 48Durable Response on TSS-C/individual symptoms defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in TSS-C/individual symptoms at Week 16 that were maintained at Week 48

Countries

Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib will be orally self-administered at a starting dose of 10 mg (two 5 mg tablets) twice a day. Dose increases of 5 mg (1 tablet) in twice-daily increments are permitted after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy for subjects who meet prespecified criteria for inadequate efficacy. HU-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose. When adjustments are made to the ruxolitinib dose, the dose of HU-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
54
Hydroxyurea
Hydroxyurea (HU) (500 mg capsules) will be orally self-administered at the dose that the subject was receiving previously. The dose may be increased after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy to optimize efficacy for subjects meeting prespecified criteria. Ruxolitinib-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose. When adjustments are made to the HU dose, the dose of ruxolitinib-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
56
Total110

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event41
Overall StudyDisease Progression01
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyReason for discontinuation not available01
Overall StudySubject decision32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRuxolitinibHydroxyureaTotal
Age, Continuous63.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.68
64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.68
63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.15
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
53 participants56 participants109 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants22 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants34 Participants58 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
50 / 5445 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 544 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects Achieving a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine (TSS-C) at Week 16, as Measured by the Modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) Diary

Symptoms of polycythemia vera were assessed using a modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) electronic diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): tiredness, itching, muscle aches, night sweats, and sweats while awake. The total symptom score ranged from 0-50 and was calculated as the sum of the 5 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 16

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT); all subjects randomized in the study. For the overall TSS-C score, only those subjects with a baseline score of 0 and a Week 16 score of 0 or missing were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RuxolitinibPercentage of Subjects Achieving a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine (TSS-C) at Week 16, as Measured by the Modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) Diary43.4 Percentage of participants
HydroxyureaPercentage of Subjects Achieving a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine (TSS-C) at Week 16, as Measured by the Modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) Diary29.6 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.13995% CI: [0.82, 4.04]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16

The TSS-C cluster includes tiredness, itching, muscle aches, night sweats, and sweats while awake.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 16

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT); all subjects randomized in the study. For individual symptom scores within the TSS-C cluster, only those subjects with a baseline score of 0 and a Week 16 score of 0 or missing were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RuxolitinibPercentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16Tiredness (n= 50, 53)40.0 Percentage of participants
RuxolitinibPercentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16Night sweats (n= 42, 48)47.6 Percentage of participants
RuxolitinibPercentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16Itching (n= 48, 50)54.2 Percentage of participants
RuxolitinibPercentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16Sweats while awake (n= 42, 46)54.8 Percentage of participants
RuxolitinibPercentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16Muscle aches (n= 47, 49)38.3 Percentage of participants
HydroxyureaPercentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16Sweats while awake (n= 42, 46)34.8 Percentage of participants
HydroxyureaPercentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16Tiredness (n= 50, 53)26.4 Percentage of participants
HydroxyureaPercentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16Muscle aches (n= 47, 49)30.6 Percentage of participants
HydroxyureaPercentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16Night sweats (n= 42, 48)41.7 Percentage of participants
HydroxyureaPercentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16Itching (n= 48, 50)32.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48

Durable Response on TSS-C/individual symptoms defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in TSS-C/individual symptoms at Week 16 that were maintained at Week 48

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT); all subjects randomized to Ruxolitinib in the study. For TSS-C/individual symptoms, subject without baseline value was excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RuxolitinibProportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48TSS-C31.5 percentage of participants
RuxolitinibProportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48Tiredness24.1 percentage of participants
RuxolitinibProportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48Itching37.0 percentage of participants
RuxolitinibProportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48Muscle aches20.4 percentage of participants
RuxolitinibProportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48Night sweats29.6 percentage of participants
RuxolitinibProportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48Sweats while awake37.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026