Skip to content

STorz Against Glidescope Effectiveness

Comparative Effectiveness of the C-MAC D-blade to Glidescope Videolaryngoscope in the Predicted Difficult Airway

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01632683
Acronym
STAGE
Enrollment
1100
Registered
2012-07-03
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2017-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Difficult Airway

Keywords

difficult airway, video laryngoscopy

Brief summary

This study evaluates success rates of tracheal intubation (passing a breathing tube)for patients who may be more challenging to intubate while utilizing one of two devices that facilitate placement of the tube with video technology.

Interventions

DEVICEC-MAC

C-MAC arm

DEVICEGlidescope

Glidescope arm

Sponsors

University of Iowa
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
CollaboratorOTHER
Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* adult 18 years of age * Mallampati classification scale score of 3 or 4 * Neck circumference greater than 40cm for males, 38 cm for females * mouth opening less than 3cm, but greater than 2cm

Exclusion criteria

* children * prisoners * history of easy intubation (success on first attempt with direct laryngoscopy) * known unstable cervical spine injury * emergency surgery * nasal intubation route * planned awake technique

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation Success Rate1 weekSuccess rate is defined as a single blade insertion with successful tracheal tube placement confirmed by return of end-tidal carbon dioxide

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation Time1 weekIntubation time is defined as the time from blade insertion to first return of end-tidal carbon dioxide
Graded Score of Laryngeal View Achieved1 weekLaryngeal view is defined by the modified Cormack and Lehane scale (1-4) and is assessed by the clinician and the study team. Grade 1 is considered to be a good view while grade 4 is considered to be a poor view.
Number of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation1 weekThe need for use of a gum-elastic bougie or external laryngeal manipulation to facilitate tube placement will be measured by the study team.
Number of Participants With Observed Complications1 weekPatients will be examined for evidence of mucosal or dental injury upon intervention. Patients will be asked if they have a sore throat in the recovery room, and their medical record will be reviewed to determine if any other airway related complications were observed by the clinical team including the need for reintubation or steroid administration to reduce swelling.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
C-MAC
Providers will utilize the C-MAC video laryngoscope equipped with a D-blade to facilitate intubation C-MAC: C-MAC arm
548
Glidescope
Providers will utilize the Glidescope video laryngoscope equipped with the #4 blade to facilitate intubation Glidescope: Glidescope arm
552
Total1,100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicC-MACGlidescopeTotal
Age, Continuous53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
292 Participants267 Participants559 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
256 Participants285 Participants541 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 5487 / 552
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 5480 / 552

Outcome results

Primary

Intubation Success Rate

Success rate is defined as a single blade insertion with successful tracheal tube placement confirmed by return of end-tidal carbon dioxide

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
C-MACIntubation Success Rate512 participants
GlidescopeIntubation Success Rate531 participants
Secondary

Graded Score of Laryngeal View Achieved

Laryngeal view is defined by the modified Cormack and Lehane scale (1-4) and is assessed by the clinician and the study team. Grade 1 is considered to be a good view while grade 4 is considered to be a poor view.

Time frame: 1 week

Population: Cormack-Lehane grade

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
C-MACGraded Score of Laryngeal View AchievedGrade 1482 participants
C-MACGraded Score of Laryngeal View AchievedGrade 241 participants
C-MACGraded Score of Laryngeal View AchievedGrade 38 participants
C-MACGraded Score of Laryngeal View AchievedGrade 410 participants
GlidescopeGraded Score of Laryngeal View AchievedGrade 42 participants
GlidescopeGraded Score of Laryngeal View AchievedGrade 1398 participants
GlidescopeGraded Score of Laryngeal View AchievedGrade 311 participants
GlidescopeGraded Score of Laryngeal View AchievedGrade 2146 participants
Secondary

Intubation Time

Intubation time is defined as the time from blade insertion to first return of end-tidal carbon dioxide

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
C-MACIntubation Time47 seconds
GlidescopeIntubation Time47 seconds
Secondary

Number of Participants With Observed Complications

Patients will be examined for evidence of mucosal or dental injury upon intervention. Patients will be asked if they have a sore throat in the recovery room, and their medical record will be reviewed to determine if any other airway related complications were observed by the clinical team including the need for reintubation or steroid administration to reduce swelling.

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
C-MACNumber of Participants With Observed Complications97 Participants
GlidescopeNumber of Participants With Observed Complications85 Participants
Secondary

Number of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation

The need for use of a gum-elastic bougie or external laryngeal manipulation to facilitate tube placement will be measured by the study team.

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
C-MACNumber of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation117 Participants
GlidescopeNumber of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation128 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026