Skip to content

Three-dimensional Craniofacial Phenotyping of Patients With Difficult Airway

Three -Dimensional (3-D) Craniofacial Phenotyping of Patients With Difficult Airway

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01630694
Enrollment
28
Registered
2012-06-28
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2016-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Failed or Difficult Intubation

Keywords

Difficult airway management, anesthesia, difficult intubation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to identify differences in craniofacial morphology and tongue size between patients who have a history of difficult airway management and a control group of patients who had an uneventful airway management during induction of general anesthesia. In this study the investigators want to validate the hypothesis that there are craniofacial phenotypic differences between patients who have a history of difficult airway management and a control group of patients who have had an uneventful airway management during the induction of general anesthesia.

Detailed description

Difficult airway management is one of the most challenging tasks for anesthesiologists. Recent data from the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Management Closed Claims Project \[1\] show that the percentage of claims resulting from adverse respiratory events, though on the decline (42% in the 1980s to 32% in the 1990s), continue to constitute a large source of morbidity and mortality in anesthetized patients. In 2005, a closed claims analysis of trends in anesthesia-related death and brain damage between 1975 and 2000 showed that out of all respiratory events (n=503) responsible for death and brain damage, difficult endotracheal intubation (n=115), inadequate oxygenation (n=111) and inadvertent esophageal intubation (n=66) were the top three causes \[2\].

Interventions

PROCEDURE3D Laser Scanning of the Head

Five scans will be collected from different angles, each scan taking approximately 3 seconds. Each scan will consist of a thin beam of light flashing of your head.

PROCEDUREMeasurements and Digital Photo's of the head, neck and Mouth

Prior to the photographs, certain bone and soft tissue areas such as angle of the jaw, neck and chin will be gently touched and marked with self-adhesive paper stickers. Using the self-adhesive paper stickers and a measuring tape, we obtain measurements of your head and neck. You will be also asked to open your mouth and a digital photograph of the back of the mouth will be taken, as well as, pictures of the front and side of the head and neck.

PROCEDUREUltrasound Exam of the Tongue

The ultrasound study of the tongue will be performed after the series of laser scans. You will be examined in the sitting position. A small,handheld, curved ultrasound instrument will be placed under the chin to take images of the tongue. This exam should take less than a minute

Sponsors

University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients that had undergone or will undergo a surgery under general anesthesia .

Exclusion criteria

* known history of syndromal craniofacial abnormalities (e.g. Down syndrome) * previous craniofacial surgery * excessive facial hair which significantly obscure facial landmarks * cervical spine fractures * tracheostomy tube * patients who are unable to give consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Hyomental Distance Ratioend of study approximately one yearA curved low-frequency transducer and a Flex focul 400 ultrasound system were used to visualize the tongue and shadows of the hyoid bone and mandible. Midsagittal and coronal/transverse scans from the ultrasound were analyzed using ImageJ. The hyomental distances in the neutral and heal-extended positions were measured from the upper border of the hyoid bone to the lower border of the mentum. The ratio is defined as the ratio of the hyomental distance at the extreme of head extension to that in the neutral position.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Tongue Volumeend of study approximately one yearThe midsagittal scans were used to measure the cross-sectional area of the tongue. Transverse scans obtained in the midsection of the tongue (at the glossal end of the genioglossus muscle) provided a measure of the tongue width, which was measured between the most distant points on its upper surface. The tongue volume was derived from the multiplication of the midsagittal cross-sectional area by the tongue width.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment period for this study is from 11-3-2010 to 10-1-2012 done in a medical clinic setting.

Pre-assignment details

Enrollment goal for this study was met so the study was closed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Difficult Intubation Patients
Obese and morbidly obese patients with a large neck circumference. This arm was patients who were difficult to intubate during previous anesthetics provided by the staff anesthesiologists. 3D Laser Scanning of the Head, measurements and digital photos of the neck and ultrasound of the tongue were performed.
12
Control
Obese and morbidly obese patients with a large neck circumference. The control group will consist of patients with easy laryngoscopy and intubation, recruited prospectively. 3D Laser Scanning of the Head, measurements and digital photos of the neck and ultrasound of the tongue were performed.
16
Total28

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDifficult Intubation PatientsControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants16 Participants28 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants16 participants28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Hyomental Distance Ratio

A curved low-frequency transducer and a Flex focul 400 ultrasound system were used to visualize the tongue and shadows of the hyoid bone and mandible. Midsagittal and coronal/transverse scans from the ultrasound were analyzed using ImageJ. The hyomental distances in the neutral and heal-extended positions were measured from the upper border of the hyoid bone to the lower border of the mentum. The ratio is defined as the ratio of the hyomental distance at the extreme of head extension to that in the neutral position.

Time frame: end of study approximately one year

Population: only 6 patients in each group were analyzed because the remaining patients were not eligible for analysis based on a review of their electronic medical chart

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Difficult Intubation PatientsMean Hyomental Distance Ratio1.14 ratioStandard Deviation 0.02
ControlMean Hyomental Distance Ratio1.02 ratioStandard Deviation 0.01
Secondary

Mean Tongue Volume

The midsagittal scans were used to measure the cross-sectional area of the tongue. Transverse scans obtained in the midsection of the tongue (at the glossal end of the genioglossus muscle) provided a measure of the tongue width, which was measured between the most distant points on its upper surface. The tongue volume was derived from the multiplication of the midsagittal cross-sectional area by the tongue width.

Time frame: end of study approximately one year

Population: only 6 patients in each group were analyzed because the remaining patients were not eligible for analysis based on a review of their electronic medical chart

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Difficult Intubation PatientsMean Tongue Volume137 cubic centimetersStandard Deviation 29
ControlMean Tongue Volume168 cubic centimetersStandard Deviation 34

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026