Skip to content

Study FFR116364, a Placebo-controlled Study of GW685698X in Paediatric Subjects With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis

Study FFR116364, a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of GW685698X in Paediatric Subjects With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01630135
Enrollment
261
Registered
2012-06-28
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2017-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial

Brief summary

Efficacy and safety of GW685698X (55 µg/day, q.d.) nasal spray over a period of 2 weeks in Japanese paediatric subjects ages 6 to \< 15 years with perennial allergic rhinitis will be evaluated compared with placebo.

Interventions

DRUGFluticasone furoate

55 mcg/day, intranasal, 2 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo, intranasal, 2 weeks

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed Consent * 6 to \<15 years of age, male or eligible female (females of childbearing potential must commit to consistent and correct use of an acceptable method of birth control), outpatient * Diagnosis of perennial allergic rhinitis: A positive test response to house dust and/or dust mites on serum antigen-specific IgE antibody test at Visit 1. One year or more clinical history of perennial allergic rhinitis. A positive test result on nasal eosinophil count at Visit 1/1A. * Either subject's parent/guardian who signed ICF or subject is able to complete assessments on the patient diary through the study. * ALT \< 2xULN; alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin \<= 1.5xULN * Average of 3TNSS is \>= 4.0 in the last consecutive 4 days prior to Visit 2. * Completion of the patient diary on \>= 3 days of the last consecutive 4 days prior to Visit 2

Exclusion criteria

* Has a seasonal pollen as an allergen * A nose disorder that could affect the assessment of the study medication or eye or nose surgery (within 3 months prior to Visit 1) * Bacterial or viral infection of upper respiratory tract or eye * Concurrent disease/abnormalities: Clinically significant uncontrolled disease * Known hypersensitivity to corticosteroids or any excipients in the investigational product * Has recent participation in a study and/or exposure to an investigational study drug within 3 months prior to Visit 1 * Use of the following medication and/or its combination drug within the specified time: Anti-IgE (Within 6 months prior to Visit 1), Immunosuppressive medications or Systemic corticosteroids (Within 8 weeks prior to Visit 1), Topical corticosteroids (Within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1), Immunotherapy or nonspecific allassotherapy which was initiated, discontinued or changed its dose within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 * Affiliation with Investigator's Site: Relative or employee * History of alcohol or drug abuse, children in care or in the opinion of the investigator (sub-investigator), inappropriate to be enrolled in the study. * Average of 3TNSS is \>= 8.0 in the last consecutive 4 days prior to Visit 2. * Bacterial or viral infection of upper respiratory tract or eye during the screening period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the 3 Total Nasal Symptom Score (3TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment PeriodBaseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks)The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the informed consent form (ICF) or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For the entire assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean score for the entire treatment period minus the score at Baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in 3TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Percent change from Baseline=(mean score at the post-Baseline assessment minus the score at Baseline) divided by the Baseline value \* 100.
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysBaseline; Days 1 through 14The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean score at the indicated day minus the score at Baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in the 4 Total Nasal Symptom Score (4TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2The 4TNSS is the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and nasal itching. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 4TNSS is 0 to 12. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average of the 4TNSS in the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). A mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the 4TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2The 4TNSS is the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and nasal itching. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 4TNSS is 0 to 12. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 4TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Percent change from Baseline=(mean score at the post-Baseline assessment minus the score at Baseline) divided by the Baseline value \* 100.
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Four individual symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and nasal itching) were scored on a scale from 0 to 3 using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average of the symptom scores in the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). A mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the participant's diary. The TOSS is the sum of all three symtpom scores and ranges from 0 to 9. The mean of the Baseline period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the participant's diary. The TOSS is the sum of all three symtpom scores and ranges from 0 to 9. The mean of the Baseline period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at Week 1 and Week 2Baseline; Week 1 and Week 2The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For Week 1 and Week 2, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean score at Week 1 and Week 2 minus the score at Baseline.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's (par.) parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the par. themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the par.'s diary. The TOSS is the sum of all 3 symptom scores and ranges from 0 to 9. The mean of the BL period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each par. was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Percent change from BL=(mean score at post-BL assessment minus score at BL) divided by the BL value \* 100.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the participant's diary. The mean of the Baseline period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Score of Troubles With Daily Life Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored the participant's troubles with daily life once daily using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Few troubles; 2, Intermediate between 3 and 1; or 3, Painful and complicating daily life. The mean of the Baseline period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWBaseline, Week 1, and Week 2/Early Withdrawal (EW)Rhinoscopy was assessed by the investigator by scoring swelling of inferior turbinate mucosa (SOITM) scored as 0 (none), 1 (possible to see center of the middle turbinate), 2 (between 3 and 1), or 3 (impossible to see middle turbinate); color of inferior turbinate mucosa (COITM) scored as 0 (normal), 1 (pink), 2 (red), or 3 (pale); quantity of nasal discharge (QTND) scored as 0 (none), 1 (small amount adhered), 2 (between 3 and 1), or 3 (filled); and quality of nasal discharge (QLND) scored as 0 (none), 1 (pyoid), 2 (viscous), or 3 (watery).
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeek 2/EWThe investigator evaluated the participant's overall response to therapy (defined as improvement in the symptoms of allergic rhinitis) compared with Visit 2 (start of the treatment period), using the following 7-point categorical scale: 1=significantly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=mildly improved, 4=no change, 5=mildly worse, 6=moderately worse, and 7=significantly worse.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantWeek 2/EWThe participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself evaluated the participant's overall response to therapy (defined as improvement in the symptoms of allergic rhinitis) compared with Visit 2 (start of the treatment period), using the following 7-point categorical scale: 1=significantly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=mildly improved, 4=no change, 5=mildly worse, 6=moderately worse, and 7=significantly worse.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's (par.) parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the par. themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the par.'s diary. The TOSS is the sum of all 3 symptom scores and ranges from 0 to 9. The mean of the BL period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each par. was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Percent change from BL=(mean score at post-BL assessment minus score at BL) divided by the BL value \* 100. Par. with a BL TOSS of 0 were not analyzed because percent change from BL could not be calculated.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per Day
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (55 micrograms \[µg\] per day) was administered as one spray into each nostril (27.5 μg per spray) once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
131
Placebo
Matching placebo nasal spray was administered as one spray into each nostril once daily in the morning for 2 weeks.
130
Total261

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol-defined Stopping Criteria Met02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous10.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.32
10.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.22
10.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.26
Gender
Female
46 Participants51 Participants97 Participants
Gender
Male
85 Participants79 Participants164 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Japanese Heritage
131 participants130 participants261 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 13125 / 130
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1310 / 130

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in the 3 Total Nasal Symptom Score (3TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period

The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the informed consent form (ICF) or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For the entire assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean score for the entire treatment period minus the score at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants meeting the primary criteria for enrollment, without any major good clinical practice (GCP) deviation, who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment and had diary assessment for 3TNSS after receiving a dose of study medication

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the 3 Total Nasal Symptom Score (3TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period-1.98 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the 3 Total Nasal Symptom Score (3TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period-0.89 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.41, -0.76]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2

Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the participant's diary. The TOSS is the sum of all three symtpom scores and ranges from 0 to 9. The mean of the Baseline period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2

Population: FAS. Only those participants with BL TOSS \>0 who were available for assessment at both BL and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. Analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, BL, Age, and Sex.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=99, 92-0.77 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=99, 92-0.56 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n= 99, 90-0.99 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=99, 92-0.47 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=99, 92-0.35 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n= 99, 90-0.56 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated Days

The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean score at the indicated day minus the score at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline; Days 1 through 14

Population: FAS. Change from Baseline was analyzed for only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated study day (Days 1 through 14). The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 2, n=131, 130-1.33 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 1, n=130, 130-0.71 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 3, n=131, 130-1.53 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 4, n=131, 130-1.69 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 5, n=131, 130-1.89 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 6, n=131, 130-1.95 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 7, n=131, 130-2.05 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 8, n=131, 128-2.14 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 9, n=131, 128-2.29 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 10, n=131, 128-2.32 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 11, n=131, 128-2.36 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 12, n=131, 128-2.54 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 13, n=122, 123-2.47 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 14, n=105, 115-2.65 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 11, n=131, 128-1.19 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 8, n=131, 128-1.05 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 1, n=130, 130-0.52 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 2, n=131, 130-0.41 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 13, n=122, 123-1.20 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 3, n=131, 130-0.61 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 9, n=131, 128-1.07 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 4, n=131, 130-0.77 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 12, n=131, 128-1.21 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 5, n=131, 130-0.77 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 10, n=131, 128-1.01 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 6, n=131, 130-0.97 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 14, n=105, 115-0.93 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at the Indicated DaysDay 7, n=131, 130-0.87 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at Week 1 and Week 2

The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For Week 1 and Week 2, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean score at Week 1 and Week 2 minus the score at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 1 and Week 2

Population: FAS. Change from Baseline was analyzed for only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period. The analysis was based on ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at Week 1 and Week 2Week 1, n=131, 130-1.60 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at Week 1 and Week 2Week 2, n=131, 128-2.38 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at Week 1 and Week 2Week 1, n=131, 130-0.70 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in 3TNSS at Week 1 and Week 2Week 2, n=131, 128-1.10 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2

Four individual symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and nasal itching) were scored on a scale from 0 to 3 using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average of the symptom scores in the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). A mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2

Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Rhinorrhea, ETP, n=131, 130-0.69 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Rhinorrhea, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.55 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Rhinorrhea, Week 2, n=131, 128-0.85 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Nasal congestion, ETP, n=131, 130-0.70 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Nasal congestion, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.56 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Nasal congestion, Week 2, n=131, 128-0.84 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Sneezing, ETP, n=131, 130-0.60 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Sneezing, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.50 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Sneezing, Week 2, n= 131, 128-0.71 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Nasal itching, ETP, n=131, 130-0.41 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Nasal itching, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.33 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Nasal itching, Week 2, n= 131, 128-0.49 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Nasal itching, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.04 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Rhinorrhea, ETP, n=131, 130-0.31 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Sneezing, ETP, n=131, 130-0.21 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Rhinorrhea, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.23 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Nasal itching, ETP, n=131, 130-0.12 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Rhinorrhea, Week 2, n=131, 128-0.40 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Sneezing, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.16 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Nasal congestion, ETP, n=131, 130-0.36 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Nasal itching, Week 2, n= 131, 128-0.19 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Nasal congestion, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.29 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Sneezing, Week 2, n= 131, 128-0.27 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion, Sneezing, and Nasal Itching Over the Entire Treatment Period (ETP), at Week 1, and at Week 2Nasal congestion, Week 2, n=131, 128-0.43 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the 4 Total Nasal Symptom Score (4TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2

The 4TNSS is the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and nasal itching. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 4TNSS is 0 to 12. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average of the 4TNSS in the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). A mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2

Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the 4 Total Nasal Symptom Score (4TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-2.40 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the 4 Total Nasal Symptom Score (4TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=131, 130-1.94 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the 4 Total Nasal Symptom Score (4TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n= 131, 128-2.89 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the 4 Total Nasal Symptom Score (4TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-1.01 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the 4 Total Nasal Symptom Score (4TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=131, 130-0.74 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the 4 Total Nasal Symptom Score (4TNSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n= 131, 128-1.29 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2

Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the participant's diary. The mean of the Baseline period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2

Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Eye itching, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.15 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Tearing, Week 2, n=131, 128-0.11 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Tearing, Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-0.10 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Redness, Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-0.11 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Eye itching Week 2, n=131, 128-0.34 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Redness, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.07 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Tearing, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.09 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Redness, Week 2, n=130, 128-0.16 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Eye itching, Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-0.24 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Redness, Week 2, n=130, 128-0.10 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Eye itching, Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-0.18 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Eye itching, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.13 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Eye itching Week 2, n=131, 128-0.23 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Tearing, Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-0.05 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Tearing, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.03 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Tearing, Week 2, n=131, 128-0.07 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Redness, Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-0.09 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Individual Ocular Symptom Scores (Eye Itching, Tearing, and Redness) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Redness, Week 1, n=131, 130-0.07 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Score of Troubles With Daily Life Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2

The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored the participant's troubles with daily life once daily using the following scale: 0, None; 1, Few troubles; 2, Intermediate between 3 and 1; or 3, Painful and complicating daily life. The mean of the Baseline period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2

Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Score of Troubles With Daily Life Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-0.43 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Score of Troubles With Daily Life Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=131, 130-0.33 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Score of Troubles With Daily Life Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n=131, 128-0.53 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Score of Troubles With Daily Life Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-0.13 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Score of Troubles With Daily Life Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=131, 130-0.10 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Score of Troubles With Daily Life Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n=131, 128-0.16 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2

Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the participant's diary. The TOSS is the sum of all three symtpom scores and ranges from 0 to 9. The mean of the Baseline period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2

Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-0.46 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=131, 130-0.31 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Change From Baseline in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n= 131, 128-0.61 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n= 131, 128-0.39 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-0.32 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=131, 130-0.22 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2

Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's (par.) parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the par. themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the par.'s diary. The TOSS is the sum of all 3 symptom scores and ranges from 0 to 9. The mean of the BL period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each par. was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Percent change from BL=(mean score at post-BL assessment minus score at BL) divided by the BL value \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2

Population: FAS. Only those participants with BL TOSS \>0 who were available for assessment at both BL and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. Analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, BL, Age, and Sex.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=99, 92-20.97 Percent changeStandard Error 11.39
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=99, 92-9.20 Percent changeStandard Error 10.9
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n=99, 90-33.52 Percent changeStandard Error 13.27
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=99, 921.57 Percent changeStandard Error 11.64
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=99, 925.37 Percent changeStandard Error 11.14
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS for the Baseline TOSS >0 Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n=99, 90-1.70 Percent changeStandard Error 13.69
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2

Symptoms of eye itching, tearing, and redness were scored by the participant's (par.) parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the par. themself using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (a larger score indicates more severe symptoms) and were recorded in the par.'s diary. The TOSS is the sum of all 3 symptom scores and ranges from 0 to 9. The mean of the BL period is defined as the mean score of 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). The mean of each assessment period is defined as the mean score of the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2. For each assessment period, a mean score for each par. was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Percent change from BL=(mean score at post-BL assessment minus score at BL) divided by the BL value \* 100. Par. with a BL TOSS of 0 were not analyzed because percent change from BL could not be calculated.

Time frame: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2

Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=99, 92-20.97 Percent changeStandard Error 11.39
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=99, 92-9.20 Percent changeStandard Error 10.9
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n= 99, 90-33.52 Percent changeStandard Error 13.27
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=99, 921.57 Percent changeStandard Error 11.64
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=99, 925.37 Percent changeStandard Error 11.14
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the TOSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n= 99, 90-1.70 Percent changeStandard Error 13.69
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in 3TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2

The 3TNSS is the sum of the 3 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 3TNSS is 0 to 9. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 3TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Percent change from Baseline=(mean score at the post-Baseline assessment minus the score at Baseline) divided by the Baseline value \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2

Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Percent Change From Baseline in 3TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=131, 130-31.96 Percent changeStandard Error 2.46
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Percent Change From Baseline in 3TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n=131, 128-47.89 Percent changeStandard Error 2.7
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Percent Change From Baseline in 3TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire treatment period, n=131, 130-39.76 Percent changeStandard Error 2.38
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in 3TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=131, 130-13.89 Percent changeStandard Error 2.44
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in 3TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n=131, 128-21.95 Percent changeStandard Error 2.7
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in 3TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire treatment period, n=131, 130-17.74 Percent changeStandard Error 2.36
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the 4TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2

The 4TNSS is the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and nasal itching. Each symptom is scored on a scale from 0 to 3; the range of sums for the 4TNSS is 0 to 12. The symptoms were evaluated using a scale of 0, 1, 2, or 3; a larger score indicates more severe symptoms. The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself scored nasal symptoms every day during the screening period and the treatment period. The Baseline value is defined as the average 4TNSS over the last 4 consecutive days prior to Visit 2 (start of the treatment period). For the entire treatment period (Weeks 1 and 2), Week 1, and Week 2, a mean score for each participant was calculated using available diary data from the assessment periods, taking the average of non-missing data during the period. Percent change from Baseline=(mean score at the post-Baseline assessment minus the score at Baseline) divided by the Baseline value \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline through the entire treatment period (2 weeks), Week 1, and Week 2

Population: FAS. Only those participants who were available for assessment at both Baseline and the indicated assessment period were analyzed. Participants were analyzed for the entire treatment period if they had an assessment on any day during Week 1 and Week 2. The analysis was based on an ANCOVA with a model adjusting for Treatment, Baseline, Age, and Sex.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Percent Change From Baseline in the 4TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-40.42 Percent changeStandard Error 2.46
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Percent Change From Baseline in the 4TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=131, 130-32.55 Percent changeStandard Error 2.54
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayMean Percent Change From Baseline in the 4TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n= 131, 128-48.58 Percent changeStandard Error 2.78
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in the 4TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Entire Treatment Period, n=131, 130-16.09 Percent changeStandard Error 2.44
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in the 4TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 1, n=131, 130-11.54 Percent changeStandard Error 2.52
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline in the 4TNSS Over the Entire Treatment Period, at Week 1, and at Week 2Week 2, n= 131, 128-20.92 Percent changeStandard Error 2.78
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Investigator

The investigator evaluated the participant's overall response to therapy (defined as improvement in the symptoms of allergic rhinitis) compared with Visit 2 (start of the treatment period), using the following 7-point categorical scale: 1=significantly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=mildly improved, 4=no change, 5=mildly worse, 6=moderately worse, and 7=significantly worse.

Time frame: Week 2/EW

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorMildly improved36 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorMildly worse1 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorModerately improved38 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorModerately worse2 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorNo change22 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorSignificantly worse0 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorSignificantly improved32 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorSignificantly worse1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorSignificantly improved12 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorModerately improved25 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorMildly improved31 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorNo change54 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorMildly worse5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the InvestigatorModerately worse2 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the Participant

The participant's parent/guardian who signed the ICF or the participant themself evaluated the participant's overall response to therapy (defined as improvement in the symptoms of allergic rhinitis) compared with Visit 2 (start of the treatment period), using the following 7-point categorical scale: 1=significantly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=mildly improved, 4=no change, 5=mildly worse, 6=moderately worse, and 7=significantly worse.

Time frame: Week 2/EW

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantMildly improved34 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantMildly worse0 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantModerately improved51 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantModerately worse0 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantNo change18 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantSignificantly worse0 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantSignificantly improved28 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantSignificantly worse0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantSignificantly improved2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantModerately improved26 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantMildly improved48 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantNo change51 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantMildly worse3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Overall Response to Therapy, as Assessed by the Participant's Parent/Guardian or the ParticipantModerately worse0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EW

Rhinoscopy was assessed by the investigator by scoring swelling of inferior turbinate mucosa (SOITM) scored as 0 (none), 1 (possible to see center of the middle turbinate), 2 (between 3 and 1), or 3 (impossible to see middle turbinate); color of inferior turbinate mucosa (COITM) scored as 0 (normal), 1 (pink), 2 (red), or 3 (pale); quantity of nasal discharge (QTND) scored as 0 (none), 1 (small amount adhered), 2 (between 3 and 1), or 3 (filled); and quality of nasal discharge (QLND) scored as 0 (none), 1 (pyoid), 2 (viscous), or 3 (watery).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/Early Withdrawal (EW)

Population: FAS. Participants who were withdrawn before Visit 3 (Week 1) were not included in the analysis for Week 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Baseline, Score 1, n=131, 1300 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Baseline, Score 1, n=131, 13052 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Baseline, Score 2, n=131, 13060 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 1, Score 0, n= 131, 12838 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 1, Score 1, n= 131, 12857 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 1, Score 2, n= 131, 12832 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 1, Score 3, n= 131, 1284 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 2/EW, Score 0, n=131, 13063 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 2/EW, Score 1, n=131, 13049 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 2/EW, Score 2, n=131, 13018 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 2/EW, Score 3, n=131, 1301 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Baseline, Score 0, n=131, 1309 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Baseline, Score 3, n=131, 13011 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Baseline, Score 2, n=131, 13029 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Baseline, Score 3, n=131, 13093 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 1, Score 0, n= 131, 12839 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 1, Score 1, n= 131, 1282 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 1, Score 2, n= 131, 12824 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 1, Score 3, n= 131, 12866 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 2/EW, Score 0, n=131, 13062 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 2/EW, Score 1, n=131, 1303 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 2/EW, Score 2, n=131, 13026 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 2/EW, Score 3, n=131, 13040 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Baseline, Score 0, n=131, 1302 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Baseline, Score 1, n=131, 13024 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Baseline, Score 2, n=131, 13054 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Baseline, Score 3, n=131, 13051 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 1, Score 0, n=131, 1289 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 1, Score 1, n=131, 12845 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 1, Score 2, n=131, 12853 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 1, Score 3, n=131, 12824 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 0, n=131, 13019 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 1, n=131, 13062 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 2, n=131, 13037 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 3, n=131, 13013 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Baseline, Score 0, n=131, 1302 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Baseline, Score 1, n=131, 13013 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Baseline, Score 2, n=131, 13028 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Baseline, Score 3, n=131, 13088 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 1, Score 0, n= 131, 1285 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 1, Score 1, n= 131, 12845 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 1, Score 2, n= 131, 12823 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 1, Score 3, n= 131, 12858 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 0, n=131, 1307 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 1, n=131, 13068 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 2, n=131, 13017 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 3, n=131, 13039 participants
Fluticasone Furoate 55 µg Per DayNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Baseline, Score 0, n=131, 1308 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 3, n=131, 13049 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Baseline, Score 1, n=131, 13032 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Baseline, Score 1, n=131, 13053 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Baseline, Score 1, n=131, 13031 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Baseline, Score 2, n=131, 13063 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Baseline, Score 3, n=131, 1308 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Baseline, Score 2, n=131, 13055 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 1, Score 0, n= 131, 12818 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 1, Score 3, n= 131, 12856 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 1, Score 1, n= 131, 12862 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Baseline, Score 3, n=131, 13036 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 1, Score 2, n= 131, 12842 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Baseline, Score 2, n=131, 13029 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 1, Score 3, n= 131, 1286 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 1, Score 0, n=131, 1285 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 2/EW, Score 0, n=131, 13037 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 2, n=131, 13020 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 2/EW, Score 1, n=131, 13057 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 1, Score 1, n=131, 12855 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 2/EW, Score 2, n=131, 13031 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Baseline, Score 3, n=131, 13068 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Week 2/EW, Score 3, n=131, 1305 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 1, Score 2, n=131, 12844 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Baseline, Score 0, n=131, 1306 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 0, n=131, 13010 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Baseline, Score 1, n=131, 1300 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 1, Score 3, n=131, 12824 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Baseline, Score 2, n=131, 13027 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 1, Score 0, n= 131, 1282 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Baseline, Score 3, n=131, 13097 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 0, n=131, 13019 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 1, Score 0, n= 131, 12818 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQTND, Baseline, Score 0, n=131, 1306 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 1, Score 1, n= 131, 1285 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 1, n=131, 13045 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 1, Score 2, n= 131, 12827 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 1, Score 1, n= 131, 12843 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 1, Score 3, n= 131, 12878 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 2, n=131, 13042 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 2/EW, Score 0, n=131, 13033 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 1, n=131, 13051 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 2/EW, Score 1, n=131, 1303 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Week 2/EW, Score 3, n=131, 13024 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 2/EW, Score 2, n=131, 13029 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Week 1, Score 2, n= 131, 12827 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWQLND, Week 2/EW, Score 3, n=131, 13065 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWCOITM, Baseline, Score 0, n=131, 1302 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Scores for Rhinoscopy Findings (Swelling of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Color of Inferior Turbinate Mucosa, Quantity of Nasal Discharge, and Quality of Nasal Discharge) at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 2/EWSOITM, Baseline, Score 0, n=131, 1307 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026