Skip to content

Preoperative Counseling in Cholecystectomy

Preoperative Counseling in Cholecystectomy. A Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01629992
Enrollment
119
Registered
2012-06-28
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2012-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Feeling, Nausea, Postoperative Pain, Vomiting

Keywords

Vomiting, Nausea, Postoperative pain, Feeling

Brief summary

The investigators examined whether a written plus verbal preoperative counseling for patients undergoing open cholecystectomy would improve perioperative symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and pain.

Detailed description

This was a randomized, single-blinded, clinical study carried out at the Julio Muller University Hospital (Mato Grosso State, Brazil). This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the hospital Research Ethics Committee registered under number 697/CEP-HUJM/09. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Except for the preoperative counseling which was received only by the intervention group, all patients received the same protocol of perioperative care. The main endpoint of the study was the presence and the intensity of postoperative symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and pain. A questionnaire containing a visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied 24h after the operation to measure the intensity of postoperative pain, nausea and the well-being. The VAS consisted of a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end to represent the lowest and the highest intensity of all the symptoms analyzed. The patient was asked to mark in the straight line the point that most likely represents the symptom at the moment. The VAS score of each individual was determined by measuring in millimeters from the left end of the line to the point marked. The questions were: how severe was your pain during this period of 24h after the operation?, how severe was the intensity of your nausea during this period of 24h after the operation? , and how great is your well-being at the present moment. For the first two questions the words at each end of the line were no pain and severe pain, and no nausea and severe nausea. For the well-being question the words were no well-being and greatest well-being. The Vomiting was also recorded as a categorical variable (yes or no). The length of stay and postoperative complications were also collected.

Interventions

The intervention group received preoperative counseling by both orally and written. A written leaflet containing information was provided to each patient of this group.

Sponsors

Federal University of Mato Grosso
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult age (18-65 years-old), * both sexes and * candidates for an elective open cholecystectomy

Exclusion criteria

* having diabetes mellitus, * chronic kidney failure, * chronic liver disease, * serum bilirubin \> 2 mg/dL, * body mass index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m2, * American Anesthesiologists Association (ASA) score \> 3, * gastro-esophageal reflux, * gastroparesis or intestinal obstruction. Patients with any non-compliance with the study protocol, who had the choledochus opened or associated operations, who experienced severe intraoperative complications (any type of shock, cardiac arrest or coagulations problems) or experienced prolonged (\> 4 h) operative time were also excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analogue scale24h after operationA questionnaire containing a visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied 24h after the operation to measure the intensity of postoperative pain, nausea and the well-being. The VAS consisted of a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end to represent the lowest and the highest intensity of all the symptoms analyzed. The patient was asked to mark in the straight line the point that most likely represents the symptom at the moment. The VAS score of each individual was determined by measuring in millimeters from the left end of the line to the point marked.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Episodes of vomitingDuring the first 24h after surgeryNumber of episodes of vomiting occurring until 24h after the operation

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026