Skip to content

A Phase 2, Randomized Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Tralokinumab in Adults With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

A Phase 2, Randomized Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Tralokinumab in Adults With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01629667
Enrollment
409
Registered
2012-06-27
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2017-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Brief summary

To study the safety and effectiveness of multiple-doses of tralokinumab on pulmonary function in adults with mild to moderate idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). IPF is a chronic, progressive, irreversible, and usually fatal lung disease of unknown cause.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of multiple doses of tralokinumab on pulmonary function in adults with mild to moderate IPF

Interventions

BIOLOGICALTralokinumab

Participants will receive Tralokinumab 400 mg IV infusion Q4W for 68 Weeks.

OTHERPlacebo

Participants will receive placebo IV once every 4 Weeks (Q4W) for 68 Weeks.

Sponsors

MedImmune LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * 1\) IPF diagnosis for \<= 5 years prior to Visit 1 (screening). Confirmation of diagnosis of IPF in accordance is required for subject inclusion 2) Confirmed diagnosis of IPF by clinical characteristics, HRCT and surgical lung biopsy (if required) 3)Mild to moderate IPF to include all of the following at screening: 1. FVC \>= 50% predicted normal 2. Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) of \>= 55 mmHg on room air or 50 mmHg at high altitude (\> 1500 meters), or oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) of \>= 90%on room air at rest 3. Hemoglobin-corrected diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) \>= 30% predicted normal 4) Be able to walk \>= 100 meters unassisted Key

Exclusion criteria

1. A FEV1/FVC ratio less than 0.70 at the time of screening (postbronchodilator) 2. The extent of emphysema on the HRCT is greater than the extent of fibrosis. 3. Currently listed for lung transplantation 4. Use of the following medications: 1. Immunosuppressive medications (eg, methotrexate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, intramuscular long-acting depot corticosteroid) within 3 months prior to Visit 1 (screening). Oral prednisone \<= 15 mg/day (or equivalent oral corticosteroid) is allowed for chronic use if subject was on a stable dose at least 30 days prior to Visit 1 (screening) 2. Pirfenidone within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 (screening) 3. N-acetylcysteine within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 (screening) 4. Live attenuated vaccines within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 (screening)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 52Baseline and Week 52Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a standard pulmonary function test used to monitor disease progression in IPF. FVC was the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in litres. Predicted forced vital capacity is based on a formula using sex, age and height of a person, and is an estimate of healthy lung capacity. Percent of predicted FVC = (observed value)/(predicted value) \* 100%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsFrom the start of study treatment through Week 88An abnormal laboratory finding which required an action or intervention by the investigator, or a finding judged by the investigator to represent a change beyond the range of normal physiologic fluctuation were reported as an adverse event. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of investigational product and Week 88 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Laboratory evaluations (haematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis) of blood and urine samples were performed.
Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsFrom the start of study treatment through Week 88Vital signs parameters included heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, weight, pulse oximetry and respiratory rate. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of investigational product and Week 88 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsFrom the start of study treatment through Week 88AEs observed in participants with clinically significant ECG abnormalities were assessed. Tricuspid valve incompetence was the only abnormality reported as TEAE. ECG parameters included heart rate, PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of investigational product and Week 88 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
Percentage of Participants With Disease ProgressionWeek 52 and 72Progression-free Survival (PFS) was used to evaluate disease progression and the percentage of participants with disease progression. A participant was classified as having disease progression if at least one of the following criteria were met:• Adjudicated respiratory-related mortality. •Adjudicated hospitalization due to IPF exacerbation. •Confirmed decline in percent-predicted FVC of greater than or equal to (\>=) 10%. •Confirmed decline in 6 minute walk test (6MWT) \>= 50 meters.
Change From Baseline in Haemoglobin (Hb) Corrected Percent-predicted Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) Through Week 72Baseline, Week 52 and 72The single breath technique was used to determine the DLco. The test was performed by qualified pulmonary function technicians with experience performing this study. Acceptable test criteria included:• An inspiratory volume of more than 85% of vital capacity. • A stable breath hold of 10 seconds (+/- 2 seconds) with no leaks, Valsalva or Mueller maneuvers. • Expiration in less than 4 seconds with appropriate clearance of dead space. The average of the two best acceptable maneuvers was used. There must be a minimum of 4 minutes between the performances of each test.
Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance Through Week 72Baseline, Week 52 and 72The 6MWT measures the distance that a participant can walk on a measured, flat hard surface in a period of 6 minutes. The 6MWT evaluates the global and integrated responses of all body systems involved during walking.
Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry at Week 68Baseline and Week 68Participants transcutaneous oxygen saturation were observed by pulse oximetry.
Change From Baseline in Lung Volumes Through Week 72Baseline, Week 52 and 72Lung volumes were evaluated by total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), and vital capacity (VC). Lung volumes were determined by body plethysmography.
Percentage of Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) ExacerbationsWeek 52 and 72The IPF exacerbations is defined as an acute, clinically significant, deterioration of unidentifiable cause in a participant with underlying IPF. Exacerbations of IPF were adjudicated according to the protocol definition by an independent committee as follows: 1\. Confirmed acute IPF exacerbation, 2. Suspected acute IPF exacerbation, 3. Not an IPF exacerbation with an alternative diagnosis provided if possible, and 4. Undetermined due to insufficient information.
Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated MortalityWeek 52 and 72Participants all cause mortality were observed. Events that resulted in participant death were adjudicated into respiratory-related mortality or all other cause mortality by an independent committee.
Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated HospitalizationWeek 52 and 72Participants who were hospitalized due to IPF exacerbation were observed. All events that resulted in the hospitalization of participants were adjudicated by an independent committee to determine if the event was due to an IPF exacerbation as follows: 1. Exacerbation or progression of IPF, 2. Result of a complication of IPF, 3. Not related to IPF (alternative diagnosis provided), and 4. Undetermined due to insufficient information.
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Through Week 72Baseline, Week 52 and 72FEV1 was the maximal volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration from a position of full inspiration.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)From the start of study treatment through Week 88Any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening situation (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a participant who received Tralokinumab. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of investigational product and Week 88 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Change From Baseline in Absolute Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 72Baseline, Week 52 and 72Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a standard pulmonary function test used to monitor disease progression in IPF. FVC was the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in litres.
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresWeek 72The CGI-S is a single, clinician completed, item designed to capture the clinician's impression of the participants IPF severity. Clinicians were asked to consider their experience in this participant population and rate the overall IPF severity of the participant using a 5-point scale (1 = very mild, 5 = very severe).
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresWeek 72The CGI-C is a single, clinician completed, item designed to capture the clinicians overall impression of change in IPF severity from the baseline state at Screening. Clinicians were asked to rate the participants IPF severity relative to their state at baseline using a 7-point scale (-3 = very much worse, 0 = no change, about the same, 3 = very much improved).
Change From Baseline in University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ) Total Score at Week 72Baseline and Week 72The UCSD SOBQ is a 24-item questionnaire designed to capture patient-reported shortness of breath. Respondents were asked to rate their breathlessness during 21 activities of daily living using a 6-point scale (0 = not at all breathless, 5 = maximally breathless or too breathless to do this activity). In addition to the 21 activity items, the UCSD SOBQ includes 3 additional questions about limitations due to shortness of breath, fear of harm from overexertion, and fear of shortness of breath. The UCSD SOBQ was scored by summing responses across all 24 items to form a total score. Scores range from 0-120 with higher scores indicative of greater shortness of breath.
Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 72Baseline and Week 72The SGRQ is a 50-item Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument developed to measure respiratory-related health status via 76 weighted responses. The SGRQ is divided into two parts. Part 1 asks respondents to consider the last 3 months and report on their respiratory symptoms using 5-point Likert scales. Part 2 asks respondents to consider their current state and respond to a series of dichotomous yes/no items related to their activities (activities that cause or were limited by breathlessness) and impacts (social functioning, psychological disturbances resulting from airways disease). Total scores and domain scores (symptoms, activities, and impact on daily life) were scored from 0-100, where lower scores indicate better health status.
Change From Baseline in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease (EXACT IPF) Total Score Through Week 72Baseline, Week 52 and 72The EXACT-IPF is a 14-item daily dairy used to capture the IPF related symptoms completed by the participants using an eDiary. The EXACT-IPF total score is the sum of all items ranged from 1 to 14. EXACT-IPF is an interval-level scale ranging from 0 to 100, where the higher scores indicate more severe condition. The EXACT-IPF used Likert scales (with 3 to 6 response options each) to capture participant reported IPF-related symptoms. The scores are the simple sum of item responses for each domain or single item.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5-Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) (Including Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) at Week 72Baseline and Week 72The EQ-5D-3L is a standardized PRO used to capture respondent's general health status. The questionnaire assesses 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 response options (no problem, some or moderate problems, and unable or extreme problems) that reflect increasing levels of difficulty. The questionnaire also includes a visual analog scale, where the participants were asked to rate their current health on a scale of 0-100, with 0 being the worst imaginable health state.
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Week 72The PGI-S is a single-item, global assessment of participant-perceived IPF severity. The assessment was designed to capture participant perceived IPF-related health status. Participants rate their IPF severity using a 5-point scale (1 = very mild, 5 = very severe).
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Week 72The PGI-C is a single-item, global assessment designed to capture participant-perceived change in their IPF health condition using a 7-point scale (-3 = very much improved, 0 = no change, about the same, 3 = very much worse).
Mean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabPredose, 0 hour, and 2 hour postdose on Week 0; predose on Week 4, 48, 72, 82 and 88The mean serum concentration of Tralokinumab were observed.
Percentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabFrom the start of study treatment through Week 88A participant was considered ADA-positive across the study if they had a positive reading at any time point during the study.
Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted FEV1 Through Week 72Baseline, Week 52 and 72FEV1 was the maximal volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration from a position of full inspiration. Predicted FEV1 is based on a formula using sex, age and height of a person, and is an estimate of healthy lung capacity. Percent of predicted FEV1 = (observed value)/(predicted value) \* 100%.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Israel, Peru, South Korea, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 409 participants participated in the study. Of which, 176 participants were randomized into the study at 48 sites including 17 sites in the USA, 9 sites in Australia, 7 sites in Peru, 6 sites in Israel, 5 sites in Canada, and 4 sites in South Korea.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 176 participants were randomized into the study. Three participants who were randomized did not receive treatment; therefore, 173 participants were randomized and treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo intravenous (IV) once every 4 Weeks (Q4W) for 68 Weeks.
57
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)
Participants received Tralokinumab 400 mg IV infusion Q4W for 68 Weeks.
57
Tralokinumab 800 mg
Participants received Tralokinumab 800 mg IV infusion Q4W for 68 Weeks.
59
Total173

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyCode break100
Overall StudyDeath153
Overall StudyEarly tretmt termntd, cmpltd safety f-up9118
Overall StudyEnrolled in another clinical study010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up011
Overall StudyOngoing AE worsening right heart failure010
Overall StudyRandomized, not treated210
Overall StudyRequiring lung transplant213
Overall StudySite error in safety follow-up001
Overall StudyStarted other medicine101
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject312028

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Tralokinumab 800 mgTotal
Age, Continuous67.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
67.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
67.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
67.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants15 Participants13 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants42 Participants46 Participants133 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
51 / 5745 / 5750 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 5716 / 5717 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 52

Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a standard pulmonary function test used to monitor disease progression in IPF. FVC was the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in litres. Predicted forced vital capacity is based on a formula using sex, age and height of a person, and is an estimate of healthy lung capacity. Percent of predicted FVC = (observed value)/(predicted value) \* 100%.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 52Baseline (n=57,57,59)70.30 Percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 12.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=36,32,35)-4.08 Percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 6.85
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 52Baseline (n=57,57,59)68.54 Percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 14.26
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=36,32,35)-6.10 Percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 6.98
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 52Baseline (n=57,57,59)70.60 Percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 13.37
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=36,32,35)-6.07 Percentage of predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.14
p-value: 0.1495% CI: [-4.13, 0.59]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.23495% CI: [-3.73, 0.91]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance Through Week 72

The 6MWT measures the distance that a participant can walk on a measured, flat hard surface in a period of 6 minutes. The 6MWT evaluates the global and integrated responses of all body systems involved during walking.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 and 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=31,31,29)19.49 MeterStandard Deviation 71.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance Through Week 72Baseline (n=55,57,56)391.07 MeterStandard Deviation 112.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=21,24,19)18.76 MeterStandard Deviation 54.83
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=31,31,29)22.96 MeterStandard Deviation 52.38
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance Through Week 72Baseline (n=55,57,56)391.69 MeterStandard Deviation 102.46
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=21,24,19)7.85 MeterStandard Deviation 78.12
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance Through Week 72Baseline (n=55,57,56)383.22 MeterStandard Deviation 93.99
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=21,24,19)-30.25 MeterStandard Deviation 78.07
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=31,31,29)-12.40 MeterStandard Deviation 55.81
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Absolute Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 72

Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a standard pulmonary function test used to monitor disease progression in IPF. FVC was the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in litres.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 and 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Absolute Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=36,32,35)-0.162 LiterStandard Deviation 0.278
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Absolute Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)2.662 LiterStandard Deviation 0.649
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Absolute Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=26,26,23)-0.322 LiterStandard Deviation 0.297
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Absolute Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=36,32,35)-0.205 LiterStandard Deviation 0.224
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Absolute Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)2.406 LiterStandard Deviation 0.664
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Absolute Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=26,26,23)-0.186 LiterStandard Deviation 0.325
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Absolute Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)2.593 LiterStandard Deviation 0.711
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Absolute Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=26,26,23)-0.282 LiterStandard Deviation 0.242
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Absolute Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=36,32,35)-0.209 LiterStandard Deviation 0.168
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5-Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) (Including Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) at Week 72

The EQ-5D-3L is a standardized PRO used to capture respondent's general health status. The questionnaire assesses 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 response options (no problem, some or moderate problems, and unable or extreme problems) that reflect increasing levels of difficulty. The questionnaire also includes a visual analog scale, where the participants were asked to rate their current health on a scale of 0-100, with 0 being the worst imaginable health state.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5-Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) (Including Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) at Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)70.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5-Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) (Including Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) at Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=24,24,23)-3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5-Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) (Including Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) at Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)70.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5-Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) (Including Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) at Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=24,24,23)2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5-Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) (Including Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) at Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)66.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5-Dimension 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) (Including Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) at Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=24,24,23)0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease (EXACT IPF) Total Score Through Week 72

The EXACT-IPF is a 14-item daily dairy used to capture the IPF related symptoms completed by the participants using an eDiary. The EXACT-IPF total score is the sum of all items ranged from 1 to 14. EXACT-IPF is an interval-level scale ranging from 0 to 100, where the higher scores indicate more severe condition. The EXACT-IPF used Likert scales (with 3 to 6 response options each) to capture participant reported IPF-related symptoms. The scores are the simple sum of item responses for each domain or single item.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 and 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease (EXACT IPF) Total Score Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=23,23,20)1.95 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.46
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease (EXACT IPF) Total Score Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=31,27,30)1.47 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease (EXACT IPF) Total Score Through Week 72Baseline (n=55,51,56)16.24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.44
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease (EXACT IPF) Total Score Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=23,23,20)0.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease (EXACT IPF) Total Score Through Week 72Baseline (n=55,51,56)15.87 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.38
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease (EXACT IPF) Total Score Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=31,27,30)1.61 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.21
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease (EXACT IPF) Total Score Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=31,27,30)1.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.18
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease (EXACT IPF) Total Score Through Week 72Baseline (n=55,51,56)17.89 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.72
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease (EXACT IPF) Total Score Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=23,23,20)1.81 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Through Week 72

FEV1 was the maximal volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration from a position of full inspiration.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 and 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=36,32,35)-0.120 LiterStandard Deviation 0.259
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Through Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)2.199 LiterStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=26,26,23)-0.260 LiterStandard Deviation 0.261
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=36,32,35)-0.148 LiterStandard Deviation 0.2
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Through Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)2.025 LiterStandard Deviation 0.495
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=26,26,23)-0.152 LiterStandard Deviation 0.317
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Through Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)2.144 LiterStandard Deviation 0.564
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=26,26,23)-0.222 LiterStandard Deviation 0.166
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=36,32,35)-0.179 LiterStandard Deviation 0.134
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Haemoglobin (Hb) Corrected Percent-predicted Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) Through Week 72

The single breath technique was used to determine the DLco. The test was performed by qualified pulmonary function technicians with experience performing this study. Acceptable test criteria included:• An inspiratory volume of more than 85% of vital capacity. • A stable breath hold of 10 seconds (+/- 2 seconds) with no leaks, Valsalva or Mueller maneuvers. • Expiration in less than 4 seconds with appropriate clearance of dead space. The average of the two best acceptable maneuvers was used. There must be a minimum of 4 minutes between the performances of each test.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 and 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Haemoglobin (Hb) Corrected Percent-predicted Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=34,30,32)-3.963 Percent predicted DLcoStandard Deviation 8.777
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Haemoglobin (Hb) Corrected Percent-predicted Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) Through Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)46.962 Percent predicted DLcoStandard Deviation 13.796
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Haemoglobin (Hb) Corrected Percent-predicted Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=23,21,22)-8.322 Percent predicted DLcoStandard Deviation 9.538
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Haemoglobin (Hb) Corrected Percent-predicted Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=34,30,32)-5.233 Percent predicted DLcoStandard Deviation 9.597
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Haemoglobin (Hb) Corrected Percent-predicted Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) Through Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)49.389 Percent predicted DLcoStandard Deviation 16.029
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Haemoglobin (Hb) Corrected Percent-predicted Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=23,21,22)-9.962 Percent predicted DLcoStandard Deviation 10.362
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Haemoglobin (Hb) Corrected Percent-predicted Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) Through Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)47.509 Percent predicted DLcoStandard Deviation 12.524
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Haemoglobin (Hb) Corrected Percent-predicted Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=23,21,22)-10.382 Percent predicted DLcoStandard Deviation 12.372
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Haemoglobin (Hb) Corrected Percent-predicted Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=34,30,32)-6.356 Percent predicted DLcoStandard Deviation 8.588
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Lung Volumes Through Week 72

Lung volumes were evaluated by total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), and vital capacity (VC). Lung volumes were determined by body plethysmography.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 and 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lung Volumes Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=32,29,28)0.891 LiterStandard Deviation 5.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lung Volumes Through Week 72Baseline (n=53,50,53)4.105 LiterStandard Deviation 0.905
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lung Volumes Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=24,22,19)-0.139 LiterStandard Deviation 0.635
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Lung Volumes Through Week 72Baseline (n=53,50,53)3.870 LiterStandard Deviation 0.905
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Lung Volumes Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=32,29,28)-0.212 LiterStandard Deviation 0.645
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Lung Volumes Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=24,22,19)-0.274 LiterStandard Deviation 0.705
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Lung Volumes Through Week 72Baseline (n=53,50,53)4.060 LiterStandard Deviation 1.192
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Lung Volumes Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=24,22,19)-0.417 LiterStandard Deviation 0.468
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Lung Volumes Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=32,29,28)-0.264 LiterStandard Deviation 0.442
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry at Week 68

Participants transcutaneous oxygen saturation were observed by pulse oximetry.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 68

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry at Week 68Change at Week 68 (n=23,25,22)-0.6 Percent of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 1.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry at Week 68Change at Week 52 (n=30,28,29)-0.6 Percent of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 2.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry at Week 68Baseline (n=57,57,59)96.2 Percent of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 1.9
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry at Week 68Change at Week 68 (n=23,25,22)0.1 Percent of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 2.4
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry at Week 68Baseline (n=57,57,59)95.6 Percent of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 2
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry at Week 68Change at Week 52 (n=30,28,29)0.4 Percent of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 1.7
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry at Week 68Change at Week 68 (n=23,25,22)-1.0 Percent of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 2.8
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry at Week 68Change at Week 52 (n=30,28,29)-0.7 Percent of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 2.7
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry at Week 68Baseline (n=57,57,59)95.4 Percent of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 2.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted FEV1 Through Week 72

FEV1 was the maximal volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration from a position of full inspiration. Predicted FEV1 is based on a formula using sex, age and height of a person, and is an estimate of healthy lung capacity. Percent of predicted FEV1 = (observed value)/(predicted value) \* 100%.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 and 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted FEV1 Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=36,32,35)-4.16 Percent of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 8.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted FEV1 Through Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)78.56 Percent of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted FEV1 Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=26,26,23)-8.77 Percent of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 8.99
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted FEV1 Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=36,32,35)-5.78 Percent of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 8.11
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted FEV1 Through Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)77.88 Percent of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 14.88
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted FEV1 Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=26,26,23)-6.42 Percent of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.13
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted FEV1 Through Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)78.94 Percent of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 14.58
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted FEV1 Through Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=26,26,23)-8.61 Percent of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 6.61
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted FEV1 Through Week 72Change at Week 52 (n=36,32,35)-7.01 Percent of predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 5.33
Secondary

Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 72

The SGRQ is a 50-item Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument developed to measure respiratory-related health status via 76 weighted responses. The SGRQ is divided into two parts. Part 1 asks respondents to consider the last 3 months and report on their respiratory symptoms using 5-point Likert scales. Part 2 asks respondents to consider their current state and respond to a series of dichotomous yes/no items related to their activities (activities that cause or were limited by breathlessness) and impacts (social functioning, psychological disturbances resulting from airways disease). Total scores and domain scores (symptoms, activities, and impact on daily life) were scored from 0-100, where lower scores indicate better health status.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)47.24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=24,24,23)2.91 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.92
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)44.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.91
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=24,24,23)3.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.11
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 72Baseline (n=57,57,59)51.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.64
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=24,24,23)3.38 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.88
Secondary

Change From Baseline in University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ) Total Score at Week 72

The UCSD SOBQ is a 24-item questionnaire designed to capture patient-reported shortness of breath. Respondents were asked to rate their breathlessness during 21 activities of daily living using a 6-point scale (0 = not at all breathless, 5 = maximally breathless or too breathless to do this activity). In addition to the 21 activity items, the UCSD SOBQ includes 3 additional questions about limitations due to shortness of breath, fear of harm from overexertion, and fear of shortness of breath. The UCSD SOBQ was scored by summing responses across all 24 items to form a total score. Scores range from 0-120 with higher scores indicative of greater shortness of breath.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ) Total Score at Week 72Baseline (n=56,55,58)40.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ) Total Score at Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=24,21,21)12.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.7
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ) Total Score at Week 72Baseline (n=56,55,58)36.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Change From Baseline in University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ) Total Score at Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=24,21,21)-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ) Total Score at Week 72Baseline (n=56,55,58)45.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
Tralokinumab 800 mgChange From Baseline in University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ) Total Score at Week 72Change at Week 72 (n=24,21,21)10.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Secondary

Mean Serum Concentration of Tralokinumab

The mean serum concentration of Tralokinumab were observed.

Time frame: Predose, 0 hour, and 2 hour postdose on Week 0; predose on Week 4, 48, 72, 82 and 88

Population: The Pharmacokinetic population included all participants who received at least one dose of tralokinumab and had at least one detectable trough (Weeks 4, 48 or 72 only) serum concentration measurement. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 0: predose (n=50,56)3.520 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 23.885
PlaceboMean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 0: 0 hour postdose (n=53,57)176.047 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 125.991
PlaceboMean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 0: 2 hour postdose (n=53,56)172.108 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 46.423
PlaceboMean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 4 (n=57,57)30.155 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 20.164
PlaceboMean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 48 (n=33,39)44.653 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 40.584
PlaceboMean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 72 (n=24,21)41.583 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 24.723
PlaceboMean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 82 (n=15,12)3.651 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 3.547
PlaceboMean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 88 (n=12,10)0.493 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 0.49
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Mean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 88 (n=12,10)10.585 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 19.084
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Mean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 0: predose (n=50,56)6.151 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 45.56
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Mean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 48 (n=33,39)80.553 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 67.187
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Mean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 0: 0 hour postdose (n=53,57)311.105 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 88.229
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Mean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 82 (n=15,12)11.442 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 13.846
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Mean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 0: 2 hour postdose (n=53,56)301.321 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 60.52
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Mean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 72 (n=24,21)76.224 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 54.045
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Mean Serum Concentration of TralokinumabWeek 4 (n=57,57)57.914 microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml)Standard Deviation 45.326
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores

The CGI-C is a single, clinician completed, item designed to capture the clinicians overall impression of change in IPF severity from the baseline state at Screening. Clinicians were asked to rate the participants IPF severity relative to their state at baseline using a 7-point scale (-3 = very much worse, 0 = no change, about the same, 3 = very much improved).

Time frame: Week 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, N is number of participants analysed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresMuch improved1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresSlightly worse8 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresNo change12 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresVery much improved0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresVery much worse1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresMuch worse1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresSlightly improved2 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresNo change13 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresVery much improved0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresMuch improved0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresSlightly improved1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresSlightly worse8 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresMuch worse2 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresVery much worse0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresSlightly worse6 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresMuch improved3 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresVery much worse1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresMuch worse4 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresNo change8 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresSlightly improved1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change ScoresVery much improved0 Participant
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scores

The CGI-S is a single, clinician completed, item designed to capture the clinician's impression of the participants IPF severity. Clinicians were asked to consider their experience in this participant population and rate the overall IPF severity of the participant using a 5-point scale (1 = very mild, 5 = very severe).

Time frame: Week 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, N is number of participants analysed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresSevere0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresModerate16 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresVery mild1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresMild6 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresVery severe2 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresModerate10 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresVery mild0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresMild10 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresSevere3 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresVery severe1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresVery severe1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresSevere5 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresVery mild1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresModerate11 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity ScoresMild6 Participant
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

An abnormal laboratory finding which required an action or intervention by the investigator, or a finding judged by the investigator to represent a change beyond the range of normal physiologic fluctuation were reported as an adverse event. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of investigational product and Week 88 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Laboratory evaluations (haematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis) of blood and urine samples were performed.

Time frame: From the start of study treatment through Week 88

Population: The safety population included all participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsIron deficiency1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypokalaemia1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsType 2 diabetes mellitus0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsALT increased0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHyperglycaemia1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsGout0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsVitamin D decreased0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHyperlipidaemia0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHepatic steatosis0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypophosphataemia0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsGGT increased0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsLiver function test abnormal0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAST increased0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsVitamin D deficiency0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHyponatraemia1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsBlood glucose increased0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypovolaemia1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAnaemia1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsDiabetes mellitus2 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHaemoglobin decreased0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypertriglyceridaemia1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsDiabetes mellitus inadequate control0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypertriglyceridaemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAnaemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHaemoglobin decreased1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypovolaemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsALT increased0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAST increased0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsBlood glucose increased0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsDiabetes mellitus0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsDiabetes mellitus inadequate control1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsType 2 diabetes mellitus0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsGout1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHepatic steatosis0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsLiver function test abnormal0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsGGT increased0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHyperlipidaemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHyperglycaemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypokalaemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHyponatraemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypophosphataemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsIron deficiency0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsVitamin D deficiency1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsVitamin D decreased0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHyperglycaemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsDiabetes mellitus inadequate control0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHaemoglobin decreased0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypokalaemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsDiabetes mellitus0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsBlood glucose increased1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypertriglyceridaemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAST increased1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsVitamin D decreased1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHyponatraemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsALT increased1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsVitamin D deficiency0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypophosphataemia1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsLiver function test abnormal1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHepatic steatosis1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypovolaemia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsGGT increased1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsGout1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAnaemia1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHyperlipidaemia1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsType 2 diabetes mellitus1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsIron deficiency0 Participant
Secondary

Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

AEs observed in participants with clinically significant ECG abnormalities were assessed. Tricuspid valve incompetence was the only abnormality reported as TEAE. ECG parameters included heart rate, PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of investigational product and Week 88 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.

Time frame: From the start of study treatment through Week 88

Population: The safety population included all participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse Events1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse Events0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse Events1 Participant
Secondary

Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

The PGI-C is a single-item, global assessment designed to capture participant-perceived change in their IPF health condition using a 7-point scale (-3 = very much improved, 0 = no change, about the same, 3 = very much worse).

Time frame: Week 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, N is number of participants analysed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Much improved1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Slightly worse3 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)No change1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Very much improved0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Very much worse0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Much worse1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Slightly improved1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)No change3 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Very much improved0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Much improved1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Slightly improved4 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Slightly worse2 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Much worse1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Very much worse0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Slightly worse3 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Much improved0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Very much worse0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Much worse2 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)No change5 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Slightly improved4 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Very much improved0 Participant
Secondary

Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

The PGI-S is a single-item, global assessment of participant-perceived IPF severity. The assessment was designed to capture participant perceived IPF-related health status. Participants rate their IPF severity using a 5-point scale (1 = very mild, 5 = very severe).

Time frame: Week 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization. Here, N is number of participants analysed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Mild8 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Very severe1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Very mild2 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Moderate11 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Severe1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Moderate13 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Very mild2 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Very severe0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Mild5 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Severe1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Very severe0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Very mild1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Mild6 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Severe0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)Moderate8 Participant
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

Any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening situation (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a participant who received Tralokinumab. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of investigational product and Week 88 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Time frame: From the start of study treatment through Week 88

Population: The safety population included all participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE53 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE13 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE50 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE16 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE57 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE17 Participant
Secondary

Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

Vital signs parameters included heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, weight, pulse oximetry and respiratory rate. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of investigational product and Week 88 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.

Time frame: From the start of study treatment through Week 88

Population: The safety population included all participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAtrial fibrillation0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsPyrexia1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsPalpitations0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAtrial flutter1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsPulmonary hypertension2 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHeart rate increased0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsArrhythmia0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsSupraventricular tachycardia1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsBradycardia1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypotension1 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsWeight decreased4 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypertension2 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsBlood pressure increased0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsTachyarrhythmia0 Participant
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsSinus tachycardia1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsSinus tachycardia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypertension1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsPulmonary hypertension1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsPyrexia1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypotension1 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsBlood pressure increased0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAtrial fibrillation0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAtrial flutter0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsArrhythmia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsBradycardia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHeart rate increased0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsPalpitations0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsSupraventricular tachycardia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsTachyarrhythmia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Number of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsWeight decreased5 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAtrial fibrillation2 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsTachyarrhythmia1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsPalpitations1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsBlood pressure increased2 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypotension1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsSinus tachycardia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsPyrexia2 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHypertension2 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsSupraventricular tachycardia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsArrhythmia1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsPulmonary hypertension2 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsBradycardia0 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAtrial flutter1 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsWeight decreased3 Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs and Physical Findings Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsHeart rate increased1 Participant
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to Tralokinumab

A participant was considered ADA-positive across the study if they had a positive reading at any time point during the study.

Time frame: From the start of study treatment through Week 88

Population: The safety population included all participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the treatment they actually received. Here, n is number of participants analysed at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabBaseline (n=54,54,58)1.9 Percentage of participant
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 0, Day 1 (n=1,3,1)0 Percentage of participant
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 48 (n=35,32,36)2.9 Percentage of participant
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 72 (n=2,1,1)0 Percentage of participant
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 82 (n=13,15,12)7.7 Percentage of participant
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 88 (n=10,13,11)20 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 88 (n=10,13,11)0 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabBaseline (n=54,54,58)1.9 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 72 (n=2,1,1)0 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 82 (n=13,15,12)0 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 0, Day 1 (n=1,3,1)0 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 48 (n=35,32,36)0 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 0, Day 1 (n=1,3,1)0 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 48 (n=35,32,36)0 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 88 (n=10,13,11)0 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 72 (n=2,1,1)0 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabBaseline (n=54,54,58)0 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies to TralokinumabWeek 82 (n=13,15,12)0 Percentage of participant
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated Hospitalization

Participants who were hospitalized due to IPF exacerbation were observed. All events that resulted in the hospitalization of participants were adjudicated by an independent committee to determine if the event was due to an IPF exacerbation as follows: 1. Exacerbation or progression of IPF, 2. Result of a complication of IPF, 3. Not related to IPF (alternative diagnosis provided), and 4. Undetermined due to insufficient information.

Time frame: Week 52 and 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Adjudicated HospitalizationAt Week 5221.1 Percentage of participant
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Adjudicated HospitalizationAt Week 7221.1 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated HospitalizationAt Week 5224.6 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated HospitalizationAt Week 7224.6 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants With Adjudicated HospitalizationAt Week 5216.9 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants With Adjudicated HospitalizationAt Week 7223.7 Percentage of participant
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated Mortality

Participants all cause mortality were observed. Events that resulted in participant death were adjudicated into respiratory-related mortality or all other cause mortality by an independent committee.

Time frame: Week 52 and 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Adjudicated MortalityAt Week 523.5 Percentage of participant
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Adjudicated MortalityAt Week 723.5 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated MortalityAt Week 527.0 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated MortalityAt Week 728.8 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants With Adjudicated MortalityAt Week 525.1 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants With Adjudicated MortalityAt Week 725.1 Percentage of participant
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was used to evaluate disease progression and the percentage of participants with disease progression. A participant was classified as having disease progression if at least one of the following criteria were met:• Adjudicated respiratory-related mortality. •Adjudicated hospitalization due to IPF exacerbation. •Confirmed decline in percent-predicted FVC of greater than or equal to (\>=) 10%. •Confirmed decline in 6 minute walk test (6MWT) \>= 50 meters.

Time frame: Week 52 and 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Disease ProgressionAt Week 5235.1 Percentage of Participant
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Disease ProgressionAt Week 7242.1 Percentage of Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants With Disease ProgressionAt Week 5235.1 Percentage of Participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants With Disease ProgressionAt Week 7242.1 Percentage of Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants With Disease ProgressionAt Week 5228.8 Percentage of Participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants With Disease ProgressionAt Week 7244.1 Percentage of Participant
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) Exacerbations

The IPF exacerbations is defined as an acute, clinically significant, deterioration of unidentifiable cause in a participant with underlying IPF. Exacerbations of IPF were adjudicated according to the protocol definition by an independent committee as follows: 1\. Confirmed acute IPF exacerbation, 2. Suspected acute IPF exacerbation, 3. Not an IPF exacerbation with an alternative diagnosis provided if possible, and 4. Undetermined due to insufficient information.

Time frame: Week 52 and 72

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received any study investigational product and participants were analysed according to the randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) ExacerbationsAt Week 5212.3 Percentage of participant
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) ExacerbationsAt Week 7212.3 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) ExacerbationsAt Week 5212.3 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 400 Milligram (mg)Percentage of Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) ExacerbationsAt Week 7217.5 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) ExacerbationsAt Week 528.5 Percentage of participant
Tralokinumab 800 mgPercentage of Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) ExacerbationsAt Week 7211.9 Percentage of participant

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026