Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of BEZ235 Compared to Everolimus in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Randomized Phase II Study of BEZ235 or Everolimus in Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01628913
Enrollment
62
Registered
2012-06-27
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2016-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (pNET)

Keywords

Pancreatic, Neuroendocrine tumors, PNET, BEZ235, Everolimus

Brief summary

This was a multicenter, open label, randomized phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BEZ235 as compared to everolimus in patients with advanced, low to intermediate grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET).

Detailed description

Patients with advanced (unresectable or metastatic), low to intermediate grade (histologically confirmed well and moderately differentiated) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) were randomized to either BEZ235 or everolimus. The study was planned to include 140 patients, with 70 patients in the BEZ235 treatment group and 70 patients in the everolimus treatment group. An interim analysis was conducted on 62 randomized patients. The study was terminated as the BEZ235 treatment did not demonstrate a progression free survival advantage to everolimus treatment.

Interventions

DRUGBEZ235

BEZ235 400 mg bid p.o. (by mouth, twice daily)

DRUGEverolimus

Everolimus 10 mg qd p.o. (by mouth, daily)

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Advanced histologically confirmed well differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor * Progressive disease within the last 12 months * Measurable disease per RECIST Version 1.0 determined by multiphase MRI or triphasic CT

Exclusion criteria

* Prior treatment with mTOR or PI3K inhibitors * Patients with more than 2 prior systemic treatment regimens * Previous cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or biotherapy within the last 4 weeks Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS)up to approx. 18 monthsPFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause. PFS is based on local investigator assessment. Patients will be followed up for the duration of the study and for an expected average of every 12 weeks after randomization. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rateup to approx. 18 monthsProportion of patients with a best overall response during the study of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on the investigator assessment. 2. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for all target and non-target lesions, as well as new lesions as assessed by CT or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Overall Survival (OS)up to approx. 30 monthsTime from randomization to the date of death due to any cause
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)up to approx. 18 monthsTime from randomization to the date of the first of the following events:death due to any cause or progressive disease, treatment discontinuation due to toxicity or treatment discontinuation due to patient preference

Countries

France, Italy, Netherlands, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Patients were assigned to one of the following 2 treatment arms in a ratio of 1:1: BEZ235 (investigational arm) or everolimus (control arm)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BEZ235
Patients received BEZ235 400 mg bid p.o. (by mouth, twice daily)
31
Everolimus
Patients received Everolimus 10 mg qd p.o. (by mouth, daily)
31
Total62

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event125
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyDisease Progression1114
Overall StudyPhysician Decision13
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall Studystudy terminated by Sponsor49
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBEZ235EverolimusTotal
Age, Continuous56.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.43
57.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.85
57.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.07
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants16 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants15 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
31 / 3130 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 319 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause. PFS is based on local investigator assessment. Patients will be followed up for the duration of the study and for an expected average of every 12 weeks after randomization. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.

Time frame: up to approx. 18 months

Population: Full analysis set: The Full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were randomized to study treatment. According to the intent to treat principle, patient was analyzed according to the treatment and strata they had been assigned to during the randomization procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BEZ235Progression Free Survival (PFS)8.2 Months
EverolimusProgression Free Survival (PFS)10.8 Months
Secondary

Objective Response Rate

Proportion of patients with a best overall response during the study of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on the investigator assessment. 2. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for all target and non-target lesions, as well as new lesions as assessed by CT or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Time frame: up to approx. 18 months

Population: Trial terminated based on the results of an interim analysis of the primary OM ( which demonstrated BEX235 not having improved PFS (progression free survival) vs everolimus).The secondary OM analyses were not conducted.

Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause

Time frame: up to approx. 30 months

Population: Trial terminated based on the results of an interim analysis of the primary OM ( which demonstrated BEX235 not having improved PFS (progression free survival) vs everolimus).The secondary OM analyses were not conducted.

Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

Time from randomization to the date of the first of the following events:death due to any cause or progressive disease, treatment discontinuation due to toxicity or treatment discontinuation due to patient preference

Time frame: up to approx. 18 months

Population: Trial terminated based on the results of an interim analysis of the primary OM ( which demonstrated BEX235 not having improved PFS (progression free survival) vs everolimus).The secondary OM analyses were not conducted.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026