Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of Ozanimod (RPC1063) in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Patients

A Phase 2/3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled (Part A) and Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled (Part B), Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RPC1063 Administered Orally to Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01628393
Acronym
RADIANCE
Enrollment
258
Registered
2012-06-26
Start date
2012-09-18
Completion date
2016-05-11
Last updated
2021-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

This study is a two-part trial consisting of Part A (presented in this record) and Part B (see NCT02047734). The primary objective in Part A of this study was to demonstrate the superior efficacy of ozanimod compared to placebo by showing a reduction in the cumulative number of total gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) lesions from Week 12 to Week 24 in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS).

Interventions

DRUGOzanimod

Oral capsule taken once a day

DRUGPlacebo

Oral capsule taken once a day

Sponsors

Celgene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Multiple sclerosis as diagnosed by the revised 2010 McDonald criteria * Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 0 and 5.0 at Baseline

Exclusion criteria

* Secondary or primary progressive multiple sclerosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions Assessed on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) From Week 12 to Week 24From Week 12 to Week 24; MRI was performed at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24The cumulative number of total GdE lesions on MRI from Week 12 to Week 24. MRI scans were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing Lesions on Brain MRI Scan at Week 24Week 24MRI scans were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes.
The Total Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions From Week 12 to Week 24Week 12 to Week 24; MRI was performed at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24The cumulative number of new or enlarging hyperintense T2-weighted brain MRI lesions from Week 12 to Week 24. MRI scans were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes.
Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Week 24Week 24A relapse was defined as new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS and preceded by a relatively stable or improving neurological state for at least 30 days. Symptoms must have persisted for \> 24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors. Relapses were confirmed when accompanied by objective neurological worsening based on examination by the blinded evaluator, consistent with an increase of ≥ 0.5 on the overall EDSS score relative to the most recent EDSS assessment, or 2 points on one of the functional system scale scores, or 1 point on ≥ two functional system scale scores. Relapse rate was calculated as the total number of confirmed relapses divided by the total number of days in the study \* 365. ARR was based on a Poisson regression model, adjusted for region, relapses within 24 months before the study, and presence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions at Baseline.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodFrom first dose of study drug up to Week 24, or up to 28 days after the last dose for participants who did not enter the extension period.An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the investigational product (IP), including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of an IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Serious AEs were events that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, were congenital abnormalities/birth defects, or important medical events which may have required medical intervention to prevent one of the above outcomes. The investigator assessed the severity of AEs as mild, moderate, or severe, and the relationship of each AE to treatment as unrelated, unlikely, possible, probable, or related based on timing and other known factors such as clinical state, environment, or other therapies.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureFrom the first dose of ozanimod, either in the placebo-controlled or the blinded extension period, up to 4 weeks after the last dose; mean duration of exposure was 25.4, 30.9, 24.6, and 32.3 months in each treatment group respectively.AEs are reported from the start of the placebo-controlled period for participants originally assigned to ozanimod and from the start of the extension period for participants who switched to ozanimod after Week 24. Serious AEs were events that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, were congenital abnormalities/birth defects, or important medical events which may have required medical intervention to prevent one of the above outcomes. The investigator assessed the severity of AEs as mild, moderate, or severe, and the relationship of each AE to treatment based on timing and other known factors such as clinical state, environment, or other therapies.

Countries

Belgium, Bulgaria, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Spain, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 55 study centers in 13 countries including the United States, Europe and Russia. Participants with multiple sclerosis (MS) were recruited between September 2012 and October 2013. The study consisted of a 24-week placebo-controlled treatment period and an optional 96-week blinded extension period.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive one of two daily doses of ozanimod (0.5 mg or 1 mg) or matching placebo for 24 weeks. Those who completed 24 weeks could enter a blinded extension phase and continue on their assigned doses of ozanimod, whereas those assigned to placebo were re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to ozanimod 0.5 mg or 1 mg. In both periods the randomization was stratified by country.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo capsules by mouth (PO) daily during the 24-week placebo-controlled treatment period.
88
Ozanimod 0.5 mg
Participants received ozanimod 0.5 mg capsules PO daily during the 24-week placebo-controlled treatment period.
87
Ozanimod 1 mg
Participants received ozanimod 1 mg capsules PO daily during the 24-week placebo-controlled treatment period.
83
Total258

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Blinded Active Extension PeriodAdverse Event01022
Blinded Active Extension PeriodLack of Efficacy00202
Blinded Active Extension PeriodPhysician Decision03010
Blinded Active Extension PeriodProtocol Violation00210
Blinded Active Extension PeriodWithdrawal by Subject06202
Placebo-controlled Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up10000
Placebo-controlled Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation01000
Placebo-controlled Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject21100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboOzanimod 0.5 mgOzanimod 1 mg
Age at Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis34.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.27
33.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
34.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.01
34.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.51
Age, Continuous38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.19
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.67
38.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.17
38.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.82
Country of Enrollment
Belgium
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Country of Enrollment
Bulgaria
4 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Country of Enrollment
Georgia
5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Country of Enrollment
Greece
4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Country of Enrollment
Hungary
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Country of Enrollment
Italy
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Country of Enrollment
Poland
132 Participants44 Participants44 Participants44 Participants
Country of Enrollment
Romania
6 Participants2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Country of Enrollment
Russia
19 Participants6 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Country of Enrollment
Serbia
37 Participants12 Participants12 Participants13 Participants
Country of Enrollment
Spain
4 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Country of Enrollment
Ukraine
28 Participants9 Participants10 Participants9 Participants
Country of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants4 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Baseline2.88 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.255
2.85 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.273
2.94 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.287
2.86 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.213
Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (GdE) Lesions1.2 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.64
1.4 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.36
0.9 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.42
1.3 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.75
Number of Relapses Within the Last 12 months Prior to Screening1.4 relapses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88
1.3 relapses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64
1.5 relapses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.18
1.3 relapses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.73
Number of Relapses Within the Last 24 months Prior to Screening1.9 relapses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.33
1.8 relapses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01
2.0 relapses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.79
1.9 relapses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
254 Participants87 Participants84 Participants83 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Eastern Europe
233 Participants78 Participants79 Participants76 Participants
Region of Enrollment
North America
12 Participants4 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Western Europe
13 Participants6 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
181 Participants62 Participants60 Participants59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
77 Participants26 Participants27 Participants24 Participants
Time Since MS Symptom Onset6.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.47
8.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.97
6.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.41
6.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.79
Time Since Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis3.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
4.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.12
2.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.98
3.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.43

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 880 / 870 / 830 / 1260 / 123
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 8824 / 8710 / 8352 / 12643 / 123
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 883 / 870 / 8310 / 1269 / 123

Outcome results

Primary

Total Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions Assessed on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) From Week 12 to Week 24

The cumulative number of total GdE lesions on MRI from Week 12 to Week 24. MRI scans were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes.

Time frame: From Week 12 to Week 24; MRI was performed at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: The ITT population is defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.~Missing data were imputed using the last valid non-missing, post-baseline observation which was carried forward if the participant was only missing 1 or 2 consecutive post-baseline scans. If there were no post-baseline data or the participant was missing \> 2 consecutive scans, the mean number of lesions from participants in the same treatment group and visit was used as the imputed value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTotal Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions Assessed on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) From Week 12 to Week 2411.1 lesionsStandard Deviation 29.87
Ozanimod 0.5 mgTotal Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions Assessed on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) From Week 12 to Week 241.9 lesionsStandard Deviation 4.77
Ozanimod 1 mgTotal Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions Assessed on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) From Week 12 to Week 241.5 lesionsStandard Deviation 3.44
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Week 24

A relapse was defined as new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS and preceded by a relatively stable or improving neurological state for at least 30 days. Symptoms must have persisted for \> 24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors. Relapses were confirmed when accompanied by objective neurological worsening based on examination by the blinded evaluator, consistent with an increase of ≥ 0.5 on the overall EDSS score relative to the most recent EDSS assessment, or 2 points on one of the functional system scale scores, or 1 point on ≥ two functional system scale scores. Relapse rate was calculated as the total number of confirmed relapses divided by the total number of days in the study \* 365. ARR was based on a Poisson regression model, adjusted for region, relapses within 24 months before the study, and presence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions at Baseline.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The ITT population is defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboAdjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Week 240.50 relapses/year
Ozanimod 0.5 mgAdjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Week 240.35 relapses/year
Ozanimod 1 mgAdjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Week 240.24 relapses/year
p-value: 0.053195% CI: [0.22, 1.01]Poisson regression model
p-value: 0.271495% CI: [0.36, 1.34]Poisson regression model
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod Exposure

AEs are reported from the start of the placebo-controlled period for participants originally assigned to ozanimod and from the start of the extension period for participants who switched to ozanimod after Week 24. Serious AEs were events that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, were congenital abnormalities/birth defects, or important medical events which may have required medical intervention to prevent one of the above outcomes. The investigator assessed the severity of AEs as mild, moderate, or severe, and the relationship of each AE to treatment based on timing and other known factors such as clinical state, environment, or other therapies.

Time frame: From the first dose of ozanimod, either in the placebo-controlled or the blinded extension period, up to 4 weeks after the last dose; mean duration of exposure was 25.4, 30.9, 24.6, and 32.3 months in each treatment group respectively.

Population: Safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study drug in the blinded extension phase

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny TEAE26 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny moderate or severe TEAE17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny severe TEAE2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny TEAE related to study drug2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny serious TEAE2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny serious TEAE related to study drug0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny death related to study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny serious TEAE related to study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny serious TEAE10 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny moderate or severe TEAE42 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny death related to study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug1 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny TEAE related to study drug3 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny severe TEAE4 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny TEAE73 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug1 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny severe TEAE1 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny TEAE related to study drug1 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny serious TEAE3 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny serious TEAE related to study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny death related to study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny TEAE32 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny moderate or severe TEAE18 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny severe TEAE2 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny TEAE related to study drug3 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny moderate or severe TEAE35 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny TEAE61 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny serious TEAE6 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny death related to study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During Ozanimod ExposureAny serious TEAE related to study drug0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the investigational product (IP), including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of an IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Serious AEs were events that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, were congenital abnormalities/birth defects, or important medical events which may have required medical intervention to prevent one of the above outcomes. The investigator assessed the severity of AEs as mild, moderate, or severe, and the relationship of each AE to treatment as unrelated, unlikely, possible, probable, or related based on timing and other known factors such as clinical state, environment, or other therapies.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to Week 24, or up to 28 days after the last dose for participants who did not enter the extension period.

Population: Safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny TEAE52 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny moderate or severe TEAE23 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny severe TEAE1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny TEAE related to study drug1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny serious TEAE0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny serious TEAE related to study drug0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny death related to study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny severe TEAE2 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny TEAE related to study drug1 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny serious TEAE3 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny serious TEAE related to study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny TEAE57 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny moderate or severe TEAE23 Participants
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny death related to study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny severe TEAE1 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny moderate or severe TEAE13 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny TEAE47 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny TEAE related to study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny serious TEAE related to study drug0 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny serious TEAE0 Participants
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Treatment PeriodAny death related to study drug0 Participants
Secondary

The Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing Lesions on Brain MRI Scan at Week 24

MRI scans were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The ITT population is defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Missing GdE data values were imputed using the mean number of lesions from participants in the same treatment group at the same visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboThe Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing Lesions on Brain MRI Scan at Week 243.2 lesionsStandard Deviation 9.81
Ozanimod 0.5 mgThe Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing Lesions on Brain MRI Scan at Week 240.4 lesionsStandard Deviation 1.27
Ozanimod 1 mgThe Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing Lesions on Brain MRI Scan at Week 240.2 lesionsStandard Deviation 0.59
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

The Total Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions From Week 12 to Week 24

The cumulative number of new or enlarging hyperintense T2-weighted brain MRI lesions from Week 12 to Week 24. MRI scans were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes.

Time frame: Week 12 to Week 24; MRI was performed at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: The ITT population is defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Missing new or enlarging T2 data values were imputed using the mean from participants of the same treatment group at the same visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboThe Total Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions From Week 12 to Week 249.0 lesionsStandard Deviation 20.87
Ozanimod 0.5 mgThe Total Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions From Week 12 to Week 241.4 lesionsStandard Deviation 3.21
Ozanimod 1 mgThe Total Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions From Week 12 to Week 240.8 lesionsStandard Deviation 1.86
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Post Hoc

Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension Period

MRI scans were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes.

Time frame: Weeks 24, 48, 72, and 120

Population: Participants who entered the blinded extension period, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had any post-baseline assessment in the blinded extension period. Includes participants with non-missing MRI results at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 24 (start of extension period)4.5 lesionsStandard Deviation 13.02
PlaceboNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 480.6 lesionsStandard Deviation 2.63
PlaceboNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 720.4 lesionsStandard Deviation 1.95
PlaceboNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 1200.1 lesionsStandard Deviation 0.46
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 1200.4 lesionsStandard Deviation 1.49
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 720.4 lesionsStandard Deviation 1.41
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 480.4 lesionsStandard Deviation 1.3
Ozanimod 0.5 mgNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 24 (start of extension period)0.4 lesionsStandard Deviation 1.28
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 720.1 lesionsStandard Deviation 0.28
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 480.4 lesionsStandard Deviation 1.35
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 1200.1 lesionsStandard Deviation 0.37
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 24 (start of extension period)1.9 lesionsStandard Deviation 5.93
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 24 (start of extension period)0.2 lesionsStandard Deviation 0.6
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 480.2 lesionsStandard Deviation 0.56
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 1200.2 lesionsStandard Deviation 0.51
Ozanimod 1 mgNumber of Gadolinium-Enhancing (GdE) Lesions During the Extension PeriodWeek 720.2 lesionsStandard Deviation 0.56
Post Hoc

Total Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension Period

The cumulative number of new or enlarging hyperintense T2-weighted brain MRI lesions from Week 12 to Week 24 in the placebo controlled period (reference) and during the first and second years of the extension period. MRI scans were assessed and scored by an independent MRI analysis center with no knowledge of treatment assignment or outcomes.

Time frame: Weeks 12 to 24 of the placebo-controlled period and Week 24 to 72 (first year) and Week 72 - 120 (second year) in the extension period

Population: Participants who entered the blinded extension period, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had any post-baseline assessment in the blinded extension period. Includes participants with non-missing MRI results in each time period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTotal Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension PeriodWeek 12 to 2410.8 lesionsStandard Error 3.58
PlaceboTotal Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension PeriodWeek 72 to 1203.2 lesionsStandard Error 1.31
PlaceboTotal Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension PeriodWeek 24 to 724.3 lesionsStandard Error 1.99
Ozanimod 0.5 mgTotal Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension PeriodWeek 12 to 241.4 lesionsStandard Error 0.35
Ozanimod 0.5 mgTotal Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension PeriodWeek 72 to 1202.3 lesionsStandard Error 0.61
Ozanimod 0.5 mgTotal Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension PeriodWeek 24 to 722.8 lesionsStandard Error 0.72
Ozanimod 1 mgTotal Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension PeriodWeek 24 to 721.5 lesionsStandard Error 0.39
Ozanimod 1 mgTotal Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension PeriodWeek 12 to 247.3 lesionsStandard Error 3.07
Ozanimod 1 mgTotal Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension PeriodWeek 72 to 1201.9 lesionsStandard Error 0.48
Ozanimod 1 mgTotal Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension PeriodWeek 12 to 240.9 lesionsStandard Error 0.21
Ozanimod 1 mgTotal Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension PeriodWeek 72 to 1200.7 lesionsStandard Error 0.16
Ozanimod 1 mgTotal Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions In the Extension PeriodWeek 24 to 721.9 lesionsStandard Error 0.84

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026