Skip to content

The Effect of Attention Bias Modification Training on Reducing Depressive Symptoms

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of the Efficacy of Attentional Bias Modification Training in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01628016
Enrollment
77
Registered
2012-06-26
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2020-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive Symptoms

Keywords

depression, attention, training, modification

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test whether attention bias modification training is an effective neurobehavioral therapy to improve depressive symptoms.That is whether attention bias modification training is superior to placebo in reducing depressive symptoms over 1 year after training.

Detailed description

Attentional bias has been theorized to play a critical role in the onset and maintenance of depression. Attentional bias modification training (ABMT), an experimental paradigm that uses training to induce adaptive attentional bias, was developed to test the causal model and this has therapeutic implications in depression.To test the effect of ABMT on treatment of depressive symptoms, a randomized, double-blind, placebo and blank controlled trial is conducted in college students who are experiencing mild-to-severe symptoms of depression.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALa word dot-probe task for training procedure

In the word dot-probe task for training procedure of attention bias modification, 90% of the targets appeared at the neutral word position and 10% at the sad word position.In the placebo condition, the targets appeared with equal probability in the sad (50%) and neutral (50%) word positions.All participants in ABM and placebo conditions received eight 12-min training sessions over a 2-week period.During each session, participants completed 216 word dot-probe trials.

Sponsors

Hunan Normal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A score of 14 or higher on the Beck Depression Inventory-II

Exclusion criteria

: 1. a current episode of MDD, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or organic mental disorder; 2. any concurrent psychotherapy; 3. any concurrent psychotropic medication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-IIFrom the baseline to posttraining, 2-, 4-, 8-week, 3-, 7-month follow-ups after trainingBeck Depression Inventory-II(BDI-II) contains 21 items and rates the depressive symptoms for the past two weeks. Each question provides for a response of 0 to 3. A zero response means the depressive symptom is not present; a 1 means the symptom is present, a 2 means the symptom is moderate, and a 3 means the symptom is severe. The total BDI-II score is the sum of the individual items; total BDI-II scores can range from 0 to 63. Cutoff points developed by Beck, Steer, & Brown (1997) for the total BDI-II are: 0 to 13, nondepressed; 14 to 19, mild depression; 20 to 28, moderate depression; 29 or more, severe depression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)From baseline to post-training, 2-, 4-, 8-week, 3- , 7-month follow-ups after trainingState-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait (STAI-T) measures the anxiety symptoms of the individuals who often feel.It consists of 20 items and each question provides for a response of 1 to 4. A 1 response means the anxiety symptom is not present; a 2 means the symptom is present but a little, a 3 means the symptom is usually present, and a 4 means the symptom lasts all the time. The total STAI-T score is the sum of the individual items; total STAI-T scores can range from 20 to 80. The higher values represent a worse outcome. The RRS measures ruminative responses to depressed mood. The content of the items is related to depressive cognitions and their possible causes and consequences. The scale consists of 21items and each question provides for a response of 1 to 4. The total RRS scores can range from 21 to 84. The higher values represent a worse outcome.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The training sessions were held in Hunan Normal University from September 14 - October 1, 2011.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions by a computer-generated random assignment. Randomization was stratified by depression severity and gender.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Attentional Bias Modification Training
Participants complete 8 sessions of attention bias modification training (ABMT) during a two-week period. The task was a modified dot-probe task, in which 90% of the targets appeared at the neutral word position and 10% at the sad word position. Each session consists of 218 trials, and the time to complete a training session is 12 minutes (4 sessions a week, roughly one session every other day with for each session).
27
Placebo Training
.Participants complete 8 sessions of placebo training(PT) during a two-week period.The placebo training procedure is a classic dot probe task in which the targets appeared with equal probability in the sad (50%) and neutral (50%) word positions.Each session consists of 218 trials, and the time to complete a PT session is approximately 12 minutes as well.The stimuli is identical to ABM condition.
27
Assessment-only Control
Participants only complete assessment at each point time.
23
Total77

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAttentional Bias Modification TrainingPlacebo TrainingAssessment-only ControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
24 Participants25 Participants22 Participants71 Participants
Age, Continuous
age
19.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58
19.52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.89
19.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.73
19.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.87
Region of Enrollment
China
27 participants27 participants23 participants77 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants17 Participants18 Participants55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants10 Participants5 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 270 / 270 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 270 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Depressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II

Beck Depression Inventory-II(BDI-II) contains 21 items and rates the depressive symptoms for the past two weeks. Each question provides for a response of 0 to 3. A zero response means the depressive symptom is not present; a 1 means the symptom is present, a 2 means the symptom is moderate, and a 3 means the symptom is severe. The total BDI-II score is the sum of the individual items; total BDI-II scores can range from 0 to 63. Cutoff points developed by Beck, Steer, & Brown (1997) for the total BDI-II are: 0 to 13, nondepressed; 14 to 19, mild depression; 20 to 28, moderate depression; 29 or more, severe depression.

Time frame: From the baseline to posttraining, 2-, 4-, 8-week, 3-, 7-month follow-ups after training

Population: Some subjects dropped out of the study or could not be contacted.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-IIBDI-II scores 2-week follow-up;n=23,21,209.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.81
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II7-month follow-up;n=23,20,188.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.68
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II8-week follow-up;n=27,27,239.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.56
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II4-week follow-up;n=23,21,218.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.97
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-IIBDI-II scores at posttraining10.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.62
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-IIBDI-II scores at baseline17.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.81
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II3-momth follow-up;n=27,27,219.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.56
Placebo TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II7-month follow-up;n=23,20,1813.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.95
Placebo TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-IIBDI-II scores at baseline18.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.11
Placebo TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-IIBDI-II scores at posttraining16.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.09
Placebo TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-IIBDI-II scores 2-week follow-up;n=23,21,2017.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Placebo TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II4-week follow-up;n=23,21,2117.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Placebo TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II8-week follow-up;n=27,27,2317.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.56
Placebo TrainingDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II3-momth follow-up;n=27,27,2114.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.12
Blank ControlDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-IIBDI-II scores at baseline18.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.18
Blank ControlDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II8-week follow-up;n=27,27,2317.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.02
Blank ControlDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-IIBDI-II scores at posttraining18.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.33
Blank ControlDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II7-month follow-up;n=23,20,1810.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.35
Blank ControlDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II3-momth follow-up;n=27,27,2113.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.97
Blank ControlDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II4-week follow-up;n=23,21,2117.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Blank ControlDepressive Symptoms Measured by Beck Depression Inventory-IIBDI-II scores 2-week follow-up;n=23,21,2017.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
p-value: 0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Anxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait (STAI-T) measures the anxiety symptoms of the individuals who often feel.It consists of 20 items and each question provides for a response of 1 to 4. A 1 response means the anxiety symptom is not present; a 2 means the symptom is present but a little, a 3 means the symptom is usually present, and a 4 means the symptom lasts all the time. The total STAI-T score is the sum of the individual items; total STAI-T scores can range from 20 to 80. The higher values represent a worse outcome. The RRS measures ruminative responses to depressed mood. The content of the items is related to depressive cognitions and their possible causes and consequences. The scale consists of 21items and each question provides for a response of 1 to 4. The total RRS scores can range from 21 to 84. The higher values represent a worse outcome.

Time frame: From baseline to post-training, 2-, 4-, 8-week, 3- , 7-month follow-ups after training

Population: Some subjects dropped out of the study or could not be contacted.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 3-month follow-up;n=27,27,2142.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.08
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 4-week follow-up;n=23,21,2138.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.16
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 7-month follow-up;n=23,20,1847.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.31
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 4-week follow-up;n=23,21,2144.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.28
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 2-week follow-up;n=23,21,2041.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.45
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at postraining;n=27,27,2341.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.44
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at postraining;n=27,27,2344.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.56
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 2-week follow-up;n=23,21,2043.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.21
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 8-week follow-up;n=27,27,2344.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.67
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 7-month follow-up;n=23,20,1843.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.75
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 8-week follow-up;n=27,27,2339.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.17
Attentional Bias Modification TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 3-month follow-up;n=27,27,2144.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Placebo TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at postraining;n=27,27,2345.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.08
Placebo TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at postraining;n=27,27,2350.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Placebo TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 2-week follow-up;n=23,21,2050.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.48
Placebo TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 4-week follow-up;n=23,21,2150.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.82
Placebo TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 8-week follow-up;n=27,27,2349.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.14
Placebo TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 3-month follow-up;n=27,27,2147.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.42
Placebo TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 7-month follow-up;n=23,20,1848.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.38
Placebo TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 7-month follow-up;n=23,20,1846.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.87
Placebo TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 2-week follow-up;n=23,21,2045.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.78
Placebo TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 4-week follow-up;n=23,21,2145.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.47
Placebo TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 8-week follow-up;n=27,27,2344.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.09
Placebo TrainingAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 3-month follow-up;n=27,27,2144.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.11
Blank ControlAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 3-month follow-up;n=27,27,2146.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.86
Blank ControlAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at postraining;n=27,27,2351.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.46
Blank ControlAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 4-week follow-up;n=23,21,2146.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.26
Blank ControlAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 8-week follow-up;n=27,27,2350.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.74
Blank ControlAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 7-month follow-up;n=23,20,1844.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.92
Blank ControlAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 8-week follow-up;n=27,27,2345.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.51
Blank ControlAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 2-week follow-up;n=23,21,2050.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.51
Blank ControlAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at postraining;n=27,27,2346.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.27
Blank ControlAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 4-week follow-up;n=23,21,2150.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.63
Blank ControlAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)STAI-T score at 7-month follow-up;n=23,20,1845.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.79
Blank ControlAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 3-month follow-up;n=27,27,2145.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.37
Blank ControlAnxiety and Rumination Symptoms Measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait(STAI-T) and Rumination Response Style(RRS)RRS score at 2-week follow-up;n=23,21,2046.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.61

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026