Depression, Elderly, Korean, Collaborative Care
Conditions
Brief summary
Late-life depression is associated with physical limitations, greater functional impairment, increased utilization and cost of health care, and suicide. Collaborative care, linking primary and mental health specialty care, has been shown to be effective for the treatment of late-life depression in primary care settings in Western countries. The primary aim of this project is to implement a depression care management intervention, and examine its effectiveness on the depressive symptoms of older patients in Korean primary care settings. Based on chronic disease management theory and previous Collaborative care management studies in western countries, we propose to test a Depression Care Management intervention,which includes care manager to support a primary care physician of depression in their old patients. Care manager'd role are monitoring the progress of treatment, supporting patient's adherence, educating patients/ family and facilitate communication between providers. Also psychiatrists provide consultation and supervision of care managers. Using a randomized controlled design, we will examine whether the Depression care management is an effective treatment for patients with late life depression in rural Korea. The primary outcome would be the improvement of depressive symptoms of patients in primary care setting.
Interventions
OTHERcare management
patients who assigned to the intervention group will take 7 times phone calls from case manager
Sponsors
National Clinical Research Coordination Center, Seoul, Korea
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* 60 year or older * diagnosed depression based on DSM-IV criteria
Exclusion criteria
* impairment of hearing * dementia * other psychiatric disorders
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Reduced depression symptoms | 3 months | HAMD (Hamilton Depression Ratind Scale) Difference HAMD score between the intervention and control group from baseline to 3 month follow-up |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Depression response and remissionhealth related quality of life | 3months and 6months | HAMD (Hamilton Depression Ratind Scale) Depression response is defined by improvement 50% or more HAMD scores from baseline to each follow-up periods. Depression remission is defined by 7 or less of HAMD score at each follow-up periods |
| Reduced suicide ideation | 3 months and 6 months | SSI (Beck's suicide ieation scale) Difference total SSI scores Between the two groups from baseline to each follow-up periods |
| Improvement of Quality of life | 3 months and 6 months | EQ5D Difference EQ5D scores Between the two groups from baseline to each follow-up periods |
Countries
South Korea
Outcome results
None listed